NRC’s Significance Determination Process: Current Status and Future Trends in Assessing Risks Attributed to External Events

REFERENCES

• SECY-99-007, “Recommendations for Reactor Oversight Process Improvements,” and SECY-99-007A, “Recommendations for Reactor Oversight Process Improvements (Follow-up to SECY-99-007),” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1999).
   Google Scholar
• “Significance Determination Process,” Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (June 2, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• “Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) Basis Document,” Inspection Manual Chapter 0308, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Nov. 8, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• “Risk Assessment Standardization Project (RASP) Tool Box,” Vol. 2, “External Events,” Rev. 1.01, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
   Google Scholar
• “Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities,” Generic Letter No. 88-20, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1991).
   Google Scholar
• GAO-12-465, “Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Natural Hazard Assessments Could Be More Risk-Informed,” U.S. Government Accountability Office (Apr. 26, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• NRC Information Notice 2010-18, “Implications of Updated Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Estimates in Central and Eastern United States on Existing Plants,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2010).
   Google Scholar
• B. SHERON, Memorandum to E. Leeds, ADAMS Accession Number ML120261155, “Transfer of Generic Issue 204 for Regulatory Office Implementation,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Mar. 6, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• SECY-11-0093, “Near-Term Report and Recommendations for Agency Actions Following the Events in Japan,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (July 12, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• SECY-11-0124, “Recommended Actions to be Taken Without Delay from the Near-Term Task Force Report,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Oct. 18, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• “Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident,” ADAMS Accession Number ML12056A046, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Mar. 12, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• JLD-ISG-12-04, “Interim Staff Guidance on Performing a Seismic Margin Assessment in Response to the March 2012 Request for Information Letter,” ADAMS Accession Number ML12286A029, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Nov. 16, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• JLD-ISG-12-05, “Interim Staff Guidance on Performance of an Integrated Assessment for Flooding,” ADAMS Accession Number ML12311A214, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Nov. 30, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• “Inspection of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Flooding Walkdowns,” Temporary Instruction 2515/187, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (June 27, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• “Inspection of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdowns,” Temporary Instruction 2515/188, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (July 6, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, “Energy,” Part 50, “Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities,” Sec. 50.48, “Fire Protection,” (c), “National Fire Protection Association NFPA 805—(1) Approval of Incorporation by Reference,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (June 2004).
   Google Scholar
• “Fire Probabilistic Risk Assessment Methods Enhancements,” NUREG/CR-6850, Supplement 1, EPRI 1019259, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission/Electric Power Research Institute (Dec. 2009).
   Google Scholar
• “EPRI/NRC-RES Fire Human Reliability Analysis Guidelines,” NUREG 1921, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (July 2012).
   Google Scholar
• “EPRI/NRC-RES Fire PRA Methodology for Nuclear Power Facilities,” NUREG/CR-6850 (EPRI 1011989), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission/Electric Power Research Institute (Sep. 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Proc. Workshop Probabilistic Flood Hazard Assessment (PFHA), Rockville, Maryland, January 29–31, 2013, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/public-meetings/meeting-archives/research-wkshps.html (current as of May 27, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• NRC Information Notice 2012-02, “Potentially Nonconservative Screening Value for Dam Failure Frequency in Probabilistic Risk Assessments,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Mar. 2012).
   Google Scholar
• F. FERRANTE, M. BENSI, and J. MITMAN, “Uncertainty Analysis for Large Dam Frequencies Based on Historical Data,” presented at 11th Int. Conf. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management and Annual European Safety and Reliability Conf. 2012 (PSAM11 and ESREL 2012), Helsinki, Finland, June 25–29, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• E. COLLINS, Memorandum to D. Bannister, ADAMS Accession Number ML112490164, “Confirmatory Action Letter—Fort Calhoun Station,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Sep. 2, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• “Hurricane Sandy,” Federal Emergency Management Agency; http://www.fema.gov/hurricane-sandy (current as of May 27, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• “Hurricane Katrina,” National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/special-reports/katrina.html (current as of> May 27, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• R. P. CROTEAU, Letter to J. Shea, ADAMS Accession Number ML13071A289, “Watts Bar Nuclear Plant—NRC Inspection Report 05000390/2012009; Preliminary YELLOW Findings, Preliminary WHITE Finding and Apparent Violations,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Mar. 12, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• R. P. CROTEAU, Letter to J. Shea, ADAMS Accession Number ML13071A253, “Sequoyah Nuclear Plant—NRC Inspection Report 05000327/2013009, 050000328/2013009; Preliminary YELLOW FINDING and Apparent Violation,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Mar. 12, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• “Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Methods in Nuclear Regulatory Activities; Final Policy Statement,” Federal Register, Vol. 60, No. 158 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• “NRC Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 2008–2013 (Updated),” NUREG-1614, Vol. 5, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Feb. 2012).
   Google Scholar
• “A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework,” NUREG-2150, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Apr. 2012).
   Google Scholar