A BEPU Analysis Separating Epistemic and Aleatory Errors to Compute Accurate Dryout Power Uncertainties

References

• A. Petruzzi and F. D’auria, “Thermal-Hydraulic System Codes in Nuclear Reactor Safety and Qualification Procedures,” Sci. Technol. Nucl. Installations, 2008, doi:10.1155/2008/460795 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• A. Petruzzi, N. Muellner, F. S. D’auria, and O. Mazzantini, “The BEPU (Best-Estimate Plus Uncertainty) Challenge in Current Licensing of Nuclear Reactors,” Proc. 14th Int. Topl. Mtg. Nuclear Reactor Thermalhydraulics (NURETH-14), Toronto, Ontario, Canada, September 25–30, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• A. Prosek and B. Mavko, “The State-of-the-Art Theory and Applications of Best-Estimate Plus Uncertainty Methods,” Nucl. Technol., 158, 69 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Frepoli, “An Overview of Westinghouse Realistic Large Break LOCA Evaluation Model,” Sci. Technol. Nucl. Installations, 2008, doi:10.1155/2008/498737 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• A. Bucalossi, A. Petruzzi, M. Kristof, and F. D’auria, “Comparison Between Best-Estimate-Plus-Uncertainty Methods and Conservative Tools For Nuclear Power Plant Licensing,” Nucl. Technol., 172, 29 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Popov, “Best Estimate and Uncertainty Analysis for CANDU Reactors,” presented at 8th Seminar on Scaling, Uncertainty and 3D Coupled Code Calculations in Nuclear Technology (3D S.UN.COP), Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, October 8–26, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• P. Sermer and F. Hoppe, “Statistical Foundation for a BEPU-Like Methodology in Nuclear Safety Analyses: An Overview,” presented at 11th Seminar on Scaling, Uncertainty and 3D Coupled Calculations in Nuclear Technology (3D S.UN-.COP), Institute for Energy, Joint Research Center, Petten, The Netherlands, Oct. 18–Nov. 5, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• D. R. Novog and P. Sermer, “A Statistical Methodology for Determination of Safety Systems Actuation Setpoints Based on Extreme Value Statistics,” Sci. Technol. Nucl. Installations, 2008, doi:10.1155/2008/290373 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• P. Sermer and C. Olive, “Probabilistic Approach to Compliance with Fuel Channel Power License Limits,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 72, 332 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• P. Sermer et al., “Monte-Carlo Computation of Neutron Over-Power Protection Trip Setpoints Using Extreme Value Statistics,” Proc. 24th Annual Conf. Canadian Nuclear Society, Toronto, Canada, June 8–11, 2003, Canadian Nuclear Society (2003).
   Google Scholar
• A. C. Cullen and H. C. Frey, Probabilistic Techniques in Exposure Assessment, Plenum Press, New York (1999).
   Google Scholar
• G. Apostolakis, “The Distinction Between Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainties Is Important: An Example from the Inclusion of Aging Effects into PSA,” Proc. Int. Topl. Mtg. Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA ’99), Washington, D.C., Aug. 22–25, 1999, American Nuclear Society.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Orechwa, “Best-Estimate Analysis and Decision Making Under Uncertainty,” Proc. BE 2004: Int. Mtg. Updates in Best Estimate Methods in Nuclear Installations Safety Analysis, Washington, D.C., November 14–18, 2004, American Nuclear Society (2004) (CD-ROM).
   Google Scholar
• G. Hahn, “Understanding Statistical Intervals,” Ind. Eng., 45 (Dec. 1970).
   Google Scholar
• P. Sermer et al., “Using Statistical Inference for Decision Making in Best Estimate Analysis,” Proc. 29th Annual Conf. Canadian Nuclear Society, Toronto, Canada, June 2008.
   Google Scholar
• “Heat Transport System,” in “CANTEACH”; http://canteach.candu.org (Jan. 1996).
   Google Scholar
• W. S. Liu, R. K. Leung, and J. C. Luxat, “Overview of TUF Code for CANDU Reactors,” Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Simulation Methods in Nuclear Engineering, Montréal, Quebec, September 1996, Canadian Nuclear Society (1996).
   Google Scholar
• “BEMUSE Phase III Report, Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of the LOFT L2-5 Test,” OECD/NEA/CSNI/R (2007)4, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency (Oct. 2007).
   Google Scholar
• C. Chauliac, “A EU Simulation Platform for Nuclear Reactor Safety: Multi-Scale and Multi-Physics Calculations, Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis,” presented at 7th European Commission Conf. Euroatom Research and Training in Reactor Systems (FISA 2009), Prague, Czech Republic, June 22–24, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• A. Petruzzi and F. D’auria, “Approaches, Relevant Topics, and Internal Method for Uncertainty Evaluation in Predictions of Thermal-Hydraulic System Codes,” Sci. Technol. Nucl. Installations, 2008, doi:10.1155/2008/325071 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Uncertainty Analysis, Y. Ronen, Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida (1988).
   Google Scholar
• D. G. Cacuci and M. Ionescu-Bujor, “Best-Estimate Model Calibration and Prediction Through Experimental Data Assimilation—I: Mathematical Framework,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 165, 18 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• A. Petruzzi, D. G. Cacuci, and F. D’auria, “Best-Estimate Model Calibration and Prediction Through Experimental Data Assimilation—II: Application to a Blowdown Benchmark Experiment,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 165, 45 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. H. Wilkinson, The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem, Oxford University Press (1965).
   Google Scholar
• W. H. Press, B. P. Flanner, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes, p. 529, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986).
   Google Scholar