Superprism-Sized Breed-and-Burn Sodium-Cooled Core Performance

References

• J. Gilleland et al., “Novel Reactor Designs to Burn Non-Fissile Fuels,” Proc. Int. Congress Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP’08), Anaheim, California, June 8-12, 2008, American Nuclear Society (2008).
   Google Scholar
• T. Ellis et al., “Traveling-Wave Reactors: A Truly Sustainable and Full-Scale Resource for Global Energy Needs,” Proc. Int. Congress Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP’10), San Diego, California, June 13-17, 2010, American Nuclear Society (2010).
   Google Scholar
• S. M. Feinberg and E. P. Kunegin, Proc. 2nd United Nations Int. Conf. Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva, Switzerland, 1958, Vol. 9, Part 2, “Discussion,” pp. 447–448, United Nations (1958).
   Google Scholar
• M. J. Driscoll, B. Atefi, and D. D. Lanning, “An Evaluation of the Breed/Burn Fast Reactor Concept,” MITNE-229, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1979).
   Google Scholar
• G. J. Fischer et al., “A Fuel Management and Reactor Physics Study of the Fast Mixed-Spectrum Reactor Concept,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 32, 792 (1979).
   Google Scholar
• J. S. Slesarev, V. A. Stukalov, and S. A. Subbotin, “Problems of Development of Fast Reactors Self-Fuel-Provision Without Fuel Reprocessing,” Atomkernenergie Kerntechnik, 45, 58 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• G. I. Toshinsky, “LMFBR Operation in the Nuclear Cycle Without Fuel Reprocessing,” Proc. Int. Topl. Mtg. Advanced Reactor Safety (ARS’97), Orlando, Florida, June 1-5, 1997, Vol. 1, p. 39, American Nuclear Society (1997).
   Google Scholar
• E. Teller et al., “Completely Automated Nuclear Power Reactors for Long-Term Operation II: Toward a Concept-Level Point Design of a High Temperature, Gas Cooled, Central Power Station System,” Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Emerging Nuclear Energy Systems (ICENES’96), Obninsk, Russia, June 24-28, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• H. Sekimoto and K. Ryu, “A New Reactor Burnup Concept ‘CANDLE,’” Proc. Int. Topl. Mtg. Advances in Reactor Physics and Mathematics and Computation into the Next Millennium (PHYSOR 2000), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 7-12, 2000, American Nuclear Society (2000).
   Google Scholar
• H. Sekimoto, K. Ryu, and Y. Yoshimura, “CANDLE: The New Burnup Strategy,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 139, 306 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Heidet, R. Petroski, and E. Greenspan, “Minimum Burnup Required for Sustainable Operation of Fast Reactors Without Recycling,” Proc. Int. Conf. Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles: Challenges and Opportunities (FR09), Kyoto, Japan, December 7-11, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• F. Heidet and E. Greenspan, “Neutron Balance Analysis for Sustainability of Breed-and-Burn Reactors,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 171, 13 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Greenspan and F. Heidet, “Energy Sustainability and Economic Stability with Breed and Burn Reactors,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 53, 794 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. K. Kim and C. Grandy, “Assessment of Fission Gas Vented Fuel Impact with Advanced Burner Reactor,” Proc. Advances in Reactor Physics to Power the Nuclear Renaissance (PHYSOR 2010), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 9-14, 2010, American Nuclear Society (2010).
   Google Scholar
• F. Heidet and E. Greenspan, “Maximum Fuel Utilization in Fast Reactors Without Chemical Reprocessing,” Proc. Global’09, Paris, France, September 6-11, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• F. Heidet and E. Greenspan, “Breed-and-Burn Depleted Uranium in Fast Reactors Without Actinides Separation,” Proc. Advances in Reactor Physics to Power the Nuclear Renaissance (PHYSOR 2010), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 9-14, 2010, American Nuclear Society (2010).
   Google Scholar
• F. Heidet and E. Greenspan, “Large Breed-and-Burn Core Performance,” Nucl. Technol., 181, 1 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• A. E. Dubberley et al., “Superprism Oxide and Metal Fuel Core Designs,” Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE 8), Baltimore, Maryland, April 2-6, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• T. K. KIM et al., “Core Design Studies for a 1000 MWth Advanced Burner Reactor,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 36, 3, 331 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Fast Reactor Database 2006 Update,” IAEA TECDOC 1531, International Atomic Energy Agency (2006).
   Google Scholar
• S. G. Hong, E. Greenspan, and Y. I. Kim, “The Encapsulated Nuclear Heat Source (ENHS) Reactor Core Design,” Nucl. Technol., 149, 22 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monte Carlo Team, “MCNP—A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code, Version 5, X-5,” Los Alamos National Laboratory (2003).
   Google Scholar
• “ORIGEN2.2—Isotope Generation and Depletion Code,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2002).
   Google Scholar
• R. L. Moore et al., “MOCUP: MCNP-ORIGEN2 Coupled Utility Program,” Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (1995).
   Google Scholar
• M. Milosevic, E. Greenspan, and J. Vujic, “Effects of Uncertainties in Lead Cross Section Data in Monte Carlo Analysis of Lead Cooled and Reflected Reactors,” Proc. Mathematics and Computations and Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications (M&C+SNA 2007), Monterey, California, April 15-19, 2007, American Nuclear Society (2007).
   Google Scholar
• C. B. Lee, D. H. Kim, and Y. H. Jung, “Fission Gas Release and Swelling Model of Metallic Fast Reactor Fuel,” J. Nucl. Mater., 288, 1, 29 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• J. C. Hesson, M. J. Feldman, and L. Burris, “Description and Proposed Operation of the Fuel Cycle Facility for the Second Experimental Breeder Reactor (EBR-II),” ANL-6605, p. 193, Argonne National Laboratory (Apr. 1963).
   Google Scholar
• H. Feinroth, J. Guon, and D. Majumdar, “An Overview of the AIROX Process and Its Potential for Nuclear Fuel Recycle,” Proc. Int. Conf. Future Nuclear Systems: Emerging Fuel Cycles and Waste Disposal Options (GLOBAL’93), Seattle, Washington, September 12-17, 1993, American Nuclear Society (1993).
   Google Scholar
• F. Heidet, “Maximum Fuel Utilization in Advanced Fast Reactors Without Actinides Separation,” PhD Thesis, p. 206, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Nuclear Engineering (2010).
   Google Scholar
• J. S. Lee et al., “Research and Development Program of KAERI for DUPIC (Direct Use of Spent PWR Fuel in CANDU Reactors),” Proc. Int. Conf. Future Nuclear Systems: Emerging Fuel Cycles and Waste Disposal Options (GLOBAL’93), Seattle, Washington, September 12-17, 1993, American Nuclear Society (1993).
   Google Scholar
• R. Petroski, B. Forget, and C. Forsberg, “Neutronic Evaluation of Breed-and-Burn Reactor Fuel Types Using an Infinite-Medium Depletion Approximation,” Proc. Advances in Reactor Physics to Power the Nuclear Renaissance (PHYSOR 2010), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 9-14, 2010, American Nuclear Society (2010).
   Google Scholar
• DOE Fundamentals Handbook: Nuclear Physics and Reactor Theory, p. 121, U.S. Department of Energy (1993).
   Google Scholar
• T. Iwasaki and K. Konashi, “Development of Hydride Absorber for Fast Reactor—Application of Hafnium Hydride to Control Rod of Large Fast Reactor,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol, 46, 8 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• A. Susplugas and E. Greenspan, “Implementation of the ENHS Thermal Hydraulic Optimization Code for Recent ENHS Design Improvement,” University of California, Berkeley, Department of Nuclear Engineering (2005).
   Google Scholar
• M. B. Toloczko, F. A. Garner, and C. R. Eiholzer, “Irradiation Creep and Swelling of the US Fusion Heats of HT9 and 9Cr-1Mo to 208 dpa at ~400°C,” J. Nucl. Mater., 212215, 604 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• G. L. Hofman, L. C. Walters, and T. H. Bauer, “Metallic Fast Reactor Fuels,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 31, 1–2, 83 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• S. Qvist and E. Greenspan, “Inherent Safety of Minimum-Burnup Breed & Burn Reactors,” Proc. Int. Congress Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP’12), Chicago, Illinois, June 24-28, 2012, American Nuclear Society (2012).
   Google Scholar