References
- “Status of Small Reactor Designs Without On-Site Refuelling,” IAEA-TECDOC-1536, International Atomic Energy Agency (2007).
- D. T. INGERSOLL, “Deliberately Small Reactors and the Second Nuclear Era,” Prog. Nucl. Energ., 51, 4–5, 589 (2009).
- “Current Status, Technical Feasibility and Economics of Small Nuclear Reactors,” Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency (2011).
- R. ROSNER, R. LORDAN, and S. GOLDBERG, “Moving to Passive Designs,” Bull. Atom. Sci. (2011).
- G. LOCATELLI and M. MANCINI, “The Role of the Reactor Size for an Investment in the Nuclear Sector: An Evaluation of Not-Financial Parameters,” Prog. Nucl. Energ., 53, 2, 212 (2011).
- R. ROSNER and S. GOLDBERG, “Small Modular Reactors-Key to Future Nuclear Power Generation in the U.S.,” Energy Policy Institute of Chicago (2011).
- M. D. CARELLI et al., “Economic Features of Integral, Modular, Small-to-Medium Size Reactors,” Prog. Nucl. Energ., 52, 4, 403 (2010).
- “Global Change Assessment Model,” Joint Global Change Research Institute; http://www.globalchange.umd.edu/models/gcam/ (accessed Sep. 9, 2012).
- Z. XU et al., “An Improved MCNP-ORIGEN Depletion Program (MCODE) and Its Verification for High Burnup Applications,” Proc. Int. Conf. New Frontiers of Nuclear Technology: Reactor Physics, Safety and High-Performance Computing (PHYSOR 2002., Seoul, Korea, October 7-10, 2002, American Nuclear Society (2002).
- Z. XU, “Design Strategies for Optimizing High Burnup Fuel in Pressurized Water Reactors,” PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2003).
- A. G. CROFF, “A User’s Manual for the ORIGEN2 Computer Code,” ORNL/TM-7175, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (July 1980).
- S. LUDWIG, “Revision to ORIGEN2-Version 2.2. Transmittal Memo,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2002).
- “MCNP5-1.40 RSICC Release Notes,” LA-UR-05-8617, Los Alamos National Laboratory (2005).
- T. B. COCHRAN et al., “Fast Breeder Reactor Programs: History and Status,” International Panel on Fissile Materials (2010); www.ipfmlibrary.org/rr08.pdf (current as of June 4, 2013).
- W. CHARLTON, “Overview and Background: Technical Efforts on Proliferation Risk,” Proliferation Risk in Nuclear Fuel Cycles: Workshop Summar., S. C. CASE, Ed., pp. 40-43, National Academies Press (2012).
- J. F. PILAT, “The Proliferation Resistance Debate and the Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection Evaluation Methodology,” Nucl. Technol., 179, 31 (2012).
- M. YUE, L.-Y. CHENG, and R. A. BARI, “A Markov Model Approach to Proliferation-Resistance Assessment of Nuclear Energy Systems,” Nucl. Technol., 162, 26 (2008); see also M. YUE, L.-Y. CHENG, and R. A. BARI, “Relative Proliferation Risks for Different Fuel Cycle Arrangements,” Nucl. Technol., 165, 1 (2009).
- M. YUE, L.-Y. CHENG, and R. A. BARI, “Applications of Markov Model Approach to PR&PP Evaluations: ESFR Full System Case Study,” Brookhaven National Laboratory (2008).
- “Design Measures to Facilitate Implementation of Safeguards at Future Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants,” Technical Reports Series No. 392, International Atomic Energy Agency (1998); www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/trs392_scr.pdf (current as of June 4, 2013).
- R. A. BARI, “Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection Evaluation Methodology: Objectives, Accomplishments, and Future Directions,” Nucl. Technol., 179, 35 (2012).