Subcritical Limits for Special Fissile Actinides

References

• H. K. CLARK, “Critical Masses of Fissile Transplutonium Isotopes,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 12, 886 (1969).
   Google Scholar
• H. C. HONECK, “The JOSHUA System,” DP-1380, Savannah River Laboratory (Apr. 1975).
   Google Scholar
• W. W. ENGLE, Jr., “A User’s Manual for ANISN,” K-1693, Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant (Mar. 1967).
   Google Scholar
• H. K. CLARK, “Ensuring the Validity of Calculated Subcritical Limits,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 28, 281 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• G. E. HANSEN and W. H. ROACH, “Six and Sixteen Group Cross Sections for Fast and Intermediate Critical Assemblies,” LAMS-2543, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (Dec. 1961).
   Google Scholar
• J. A. SMITH, C. J. BANICK, R. L. FOLGER, H. P. HOLCOMB, and I. B. RICHTER, “Reactor Cross Sections for 242Pu-2S2Cf,” Proc. Conf. Neutron Cross Sections and Technology Procedures, Washington, D.C., 1968, NBS Special Publication 299, Vol. II, p. 1285, D. R. GOLDMAN, Ed. (1968).
   Google Scholar
• J. E. SUICH and H. C. HONECK, “The HAMMER System,” DP-1064, Savannah River Laboratory (1967).
   Google Scholar
• R. W. BENJAMIN, F. J. McCROSSON, T. C. GORRELL, and V. D. VANDERVELDE, “A Consistent Set of Heavy Actinide Multigroup Cross Sections,” DP-1394, Savannah River Laboratory (Dec. 1975).
   Google Scholar
• R. W. BENJAMIN, F. J. McCROSSON, and P. L. ROGGENKAMP, “Conversion of 238Pu and 252Cf Production Chain Cross Section Data to ENDF/B-IV Format,” EPRI NP-161, Electric Power Research Institute (Dec. 1975).
   Google Scholar
• R. W. BENJAMIN, F. J. McCROSSON, and W. E. GETTYS, “Evaluation of Neutron Cross Section for 244Cm, 246Cm, and 248Cm,” DP-1447, Savannah River Laboratory (Jan. 1977).
   Google Scholar
• R. M. HARBOUR, K. W. MacMURDO, and F. J. McCROSSON, “Thermal Neutron Capture Cross Sections and Capture Resonance Integrals of Americium-241,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 50, 364 (1973);
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  also, J. C. BROWNE, R. W. BENJAMIN, and D. G. KARRAKER, “Fission Cross Section for Curium-245 from 0.01 to 35 eV,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 65, 166 (1978);
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  also, R. W. BENJAMIN, C. E. AHLFELD, J. A. HARVEY, and N. W. HILL, “Neutron Total Cross Section of Curium-248,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 55, 440 (1974);
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  also, O. D. SIMPSON, F. B. SIMPSON, J. A. HARVEY, G. G. SLAUGHTER, R. W. BEN-JAMIN, and C. E. AHLFELD, “The Neutron Total Cross Section of Americium-243,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 55, 273 (1974)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  also, R. W. BENJAMIN, K. W. MacMURDO, and J. D. SPENCER, “Fission Cross Sections for Five Isotopes of Curium and Californium-249,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 47, 203 (1972).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. W. BENJAMIN, “Status of Measured Neutron Cross Sections of Transactinium Isotope for Thermal Reactors,” Transactinium Isotope Nuclear Data, CONF-751104-3, Vol. 2 (1976).
   Google Scholar
• R. W. BENJAMIN, “Nuclear Data for Actinide Production and Depletion Calculations,” DP-MS-78-39, May 1978, Electric Power Research Institute Report ( to be published).
   Google Scholar
• R. W. BENJAMIN, “The Evaluation and Testing of Actinide Cross Section Data,” Electric Power Research Institute Report and Private Communication ( to be published).
   Google Scholar
• D. R. SMITH and W. U. GEER, “Critical Mass of a Water-Reflected Plutonium Sphere,” Nucl. Appl. Technol., 1, 405 (1969).
   Google Scholar
• W. F. STUBBINS, D. M. BARTON, and F. D. LONADIER, “The Neutron-Production Cross Section of 238Pu in a Fast Spectrum,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 25, 377 (1966).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. E. HANSEN and H. C. PAXTON, “Re-Evaluation Critical Specifications of Some Los Alamos Fast-Neutron Systems,” LAMS-4208, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (Sep. 1969).
   Google Scholar
• C. C. BYERS, G. E. HANSEN, J. J. KOELLING, E. A. PLASSMAN, and D. R. SMITH, “Reactivity Coefficients of Heavy Isotopes in LASL’s Fast Critical Assemblies,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc, 28, 295 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• D. M. BARTON, “Central Reactivity Contributions of 244Cm, 239Pu, and 235U, in a Bare Critical Assembly of Plutonium Metal,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 33, 51 (1968).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. K. FOX and L. W. GILLEY, “Critical Experiments with Aqueous Solutions of 235U,” ORNL-2081, p. 61, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Nov. 1956).
   Google Scholar
• J. K. FOX, L. W. GILLEY, R. GWIN, and J. T. THOMAS, “Critical Parameters of Uranium Solutions in Simple Geometry,” ORNL-2609, p. 42, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1958).
   Google Scholar
• R. GWIN and D. W. MAGNUSON, “The Measurement of Eta and Other Properties of 233U and 235U in Critical Aqueous Solutions,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 12, 364 (1962).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. K. CLARK, “Effect of Distribution of Fissile Material on Critical Mass,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 24, 133 (1966).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “American National Standard for Nuclear Criticality Safety in Operation with Fissionable Materials Outside Reactors,” ANSI.N16.1-1975, American Nuclear Society (1975).
   Google Scholar