Prichard, Falk, and the End of Deliberation

References

• Thanks to Evan Tiffany, Sam Black, Stephen Darwall, Arnie Zweig, and especially Michael Gill for helpful comments and discussion.
   Google Scholar
• Selby-Bigge , L. A. and Nidditch , P. H. , eds. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals Oxford : Clarendon . Thanks to Michael Gill for reminding me of this passage, one that Falk himself thought of as quite significant. David Hume, “Appendix I. Concerning Moral Sentiment,” ed. 290.
   Google Scholar
• Falk , W. D. 1986 . “‘Ought’ and Motivation.” Reprinted in ” . In Ought, Reasons and Morality: The Collected Papers of W. D. Falk Vol. 21 , 17 – 28 . Ithaca , NY : Cornell University Press . 21–41; H.A. Prichard “Does Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?”, Mind n.s. no. 81 (1912): 21–37; B. Williams, “Internal and External Reasons,” in Rational Action, ed. R. Harrison (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979)
   Google Scholar
• Noûs , 24 257 – 67 . Most of the important distinctions we have because of the work of Stephen Darwall, for instance, in his “Autonomist Internalism and the Justification of Morals.” (1990):
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodpaster , K. , ed. 1976 . Perspectives on Morality: Essays of William Frankena Notre Dame , IN : Notre Dame University Press . The first to point this out was Frankena, in W. Frankena, “Obligation and Motivation in Recent Moral Philosophy,” in ed.
   Google Scholar
• 2004 . Noûs , 38 : 266 – 98 . A question others have asked. For instance, see K. Setiya, “Against Internalism,”:
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prichard himself appears to think of himself as both a realist and an internalist— although Falk himself argues that Prichard is confused.
   Google Scholar
• 2005 . Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy , 1 : 1 – 27 . I am thinking foremost of Darwall. Also see M. Schroeder, “Cudworth and Normative Explanations,”:
   Google Scholar
• 1975 . Philosophical Studies , 27 : 1 – 18 . Falk himself found this passage to be significant. See, e.g., W.D. Falk, “Hume on Practical Reason,”:
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.g., Prichard “Does Moral Philosophy.”, 36.
   Google Scholar
• Prichard , H. A. 1949 . “Duty and Interest,” in ” . In Moral Obligation: Essays and Lectures 486 Oxford : Clarendon .
   Google Scholar
• Falk . “Hume on Practical Reason,” 29.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 38.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 38. Emphasis added.
   Google Scholar
• 36 – 37 . Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• Prichard “Does Moral Philosophy.”, 22.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 23.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 27.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 32.
   Google Scholar
• Ought, Reasons, and Morality 163 – 179 . See, for instance, his remarks on “Morals without Faith,” in Falk
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 231.
   Google Scholar
• 1974 . Philosophy: The Journal of the Royal Institute of Philosophy , 49 : 123 – 34 . See, for instance, Jonathan Bennett's well-known paper, “The Conscience of Huckleberry Finn,”:
   Google Scholar
• “‘Ought, and Motivation,” 127.
   Google Scholar
• 1998 . What We Owe to Each Other Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press . See, e.g., T.M. Scanlon's argument for the notion of ‘reason’ as a primitive term, in e.g., p. 17.
   Google Scholar
• 95 – 98 . Buck-passers such as Scanlon; see ibid.
   Google Scholar