References
- Birnbaum , M. H. 2004 . Human research and data collection via the Internet . Annual Review of Psychology , 55 : 803 – 832 .
- Broeder , D. 1959 . The University of Chicago jury project . Nebraska Law Review , 38 : 744 – 760 .
- Carretta , T. R. and Moreland , R. L. 1983 . The direct and indirect effects of inadmissible evidence . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 13 : 291 – 309 .
- Conway , M. A. , Harries , K. , Noyes , J. , Racsma'ny , M. and Frankish , C. R. 2000 . The disruption and dissolution of directed forgetting: Inhibitory control of memory . Journal of Memory and Language , 43 : 409 – 430 .
- Elliott , R. , Farrington , B. and Manheimer , H. 1988 . Eyewitnesses credible and discredible . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 18 : 1411 – 1422 .
- Findlay , M. 1988 . The jury under attack , : 161 – 172 .
- Finkel , N. J. 1995 . “ Commonsense justice: Jurors' notions of the law ” .
- Finkel , N. J. 2000 . Commonsense justice and jury instructions: Instructive and reciprocating connections . Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 6 : 591 – 628 .
- Finkel , N. J. and Sales , B. D. 1997 . Commonsense justice: Old roots, germinant ground, and new shoots . Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 3 : 227 – 241 .
- Golding , J. M. , Long , D. L. and MacLeod , C. M. 1994 . You can't always forget what you want: Directed forgetting of related words . Journal of Memory and Language , 33 : 493 – 510 .
- Hatvany , N. and Strack , F. 1980 . The impact of a discredited key witness . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 10 : 490 – 509 .
- Johnson , H. M. 1994 . Processes of successful intentional forgetting . Psychological Bulletin , 116 : 272 – 292 .
- Kassin , S. M. and Sommers , S. R. 1997 . Inadmissible testimony, instructions to disregard, and the jury: Substantive versus procedural considerations . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 23 : 1046 – 1054 .
- MacLeod , C. M. 1998 . “ Intentional forgetting: Interdisciplinary approaches ” . 413 – 433 .
- Pennington , N. and Hastie , R. 1988 . Explanationbased decision-making: Effects of memory structure on judgment . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 14 : 521 – 533 .
- Pennington , N. and Hastie , R. 1992 . Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision-making . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 62 : 189 – 206 .
- Pennington, N. and Hastie, R. (1993) pp. 192-221.
- Pickel , K. L. 1995 . Inducing jurors to disregard inadmissible evidence: A legal explanation does not help . Law and Human Behavior , 19 : 407 – 424 .
- Schul , Y. and Manzury , F. 1990 . The effects of type of encoding and strength of discounting appeal on the success of ignoring an invalid testimony . European Journal of Social Psychology , 20 : 337 – 349 .
- Schul , Y. and Mayo , R. 1999 . Two sources are better than one: The effects of ignoring one message on using a different message from the same source . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 35 : 327 – 345 .
- Sommers , S. R. and Kassin , S. M. 2001 . On the many impacts of inadmissible testimony: Selective compliance, need for cognition, and overcorrection bias . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 27 : 1368 – 1377 .
- Weinberg , H. I. and Baron , R. S. 1982 . The discredible eyewitness . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 8 : 60 – 67 .