518
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Influence of Limiting Instructions on Processing and Judgments of Emotionally Evocative Evidence

&
Pages 110-123 | Published online: 04 Mar 2011

References

  • 1985 . “ Evidence ” . 26
  • Brehm , J. 1966 . “ A theory of psychological reactance ” .
  • Bright , D. A. and Goodman-Delahunty , J. 2004 . The influence of gruesome verbal evidence on mock juror verdicts . Psychiatry, Psychology and Law , 11 : 154 – 166 .
  • Broeder , D. W. 1959 . The University of Chicago jury project . Nebraska Law Review , 88 : 744 – 760 .
  • Carlson , K. A. and Russo , J. E. 2001 . Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied , 7 : 91 – 103 .
  • 1981 Carter v Kentucky
  • Clore , G. L. 1992 . “ The construction of social judgments ” . 133 – 163 .
  • Cox , M. and Tanford , S. 1989 . Effects of evidence and instructions in civil trials: An experimental investigation of the rules of admissibility . Social Behavior , 4 : 31 – 55 .
  • DeSteno , D. , Petty , R. E. , Rucker , D. D. , Wegener , D. T. and Braverman , J. 2004 . Discrete emotions and persuasion: The role of emotion-induced expectancies . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 86 : 43 – 56 .
  • Doob , A. N. and Kirshenbaum , H. M. 1973 . Some empirical evidence on the effect of s. 12 of the Canada Evidence Act upon an accused . The Criminal Law Quarterly , 15 : 88 – 96 .
  • Douglas , K. S. , Lyon , D. R. and Ogloff , J. R. P. 1997 . The impact of graphic photographic evidence on mock juror decisions in a murder trial: Probative or prejudicial? . Law and Human Behavior , 21 : 485 – 501 .
  • 2002 DPP v Weiss
  • 1977 Driscoll v The Queen
  • Edwards , K. and Bryan , T. S. 1997 . Judgmental biases produced by instructions to disregard: The (paradoxical) case of emotional evidence . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 23 : 849 – 864 .
  • Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)
  • 2004 Federal Rules of Evidence
  • Forgas , J. P. 1995 . Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM) . Psychological Bulletin , 117 : 39 – 66 .
  • ForsterLee , L. and Horowitz , I. A. 1997 . Enhancing juror competence in a complex trial . Applied Cognitive Psychology , 11 : 305 – 319 .
  • Frank , J. 1949 . “ Courts on trial ” .
  • Frey , D. 1982 . Different levels of cognitive dissonance, information seeking, and information avoidance . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 43 : 1175 – 1183 .
  • Green , E. and Dodge , M. 1995 . The influence of prior record evidence on juror decision making . Law and Human Behavior , 19 : 67 – 77 .
  • Heuer , L. and Penrod , S. D. 1989 . Instructing jurors: A field experiment with written and preliminary instructions . Law and Human Behavior , 13 : 409 – 430 .
  • 2001 Jack Taiheke Wyllie v The Queen
  • Jacobs v Singletary
  • 1978 Jeffrey v Black
  • Kassin , S. M. and Garfield , D. A. 1991 . Blood and guts: General and trial specific effects of videotaped crime scenes on mock juror verdicts . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 21 : 1456 – 1472 .
  • Kassin , S. M. and Wrightsman , L. S. 1979 . On the requirement of proof: The timing of judicial instructions and mock juror verdicts . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 37 : 1877 – 1887 .
  • 1981 Kozul v The Queen
  • Kramer , G. P. , Kerr , N. L. and Carroll , J. S. 1990 . Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias . Law and Human Behavior , 14 : 409 – 438 .
  • Lieberman , J. D. and Arndt , J. 2000 . Understanding the limits of limiting instructions: Social psychological explanations for the failures of instructions to disregard pre-trial publicity and other inadmissible evidence . Psychology, Public Policy and Law , 6 : 677 – 711 .
  • London , K. and Nunez , N. 2000 . The effects of jury deliberations on jurors' propensity to disregard inadmissible evidence . Journal of Applied Psychology , 85 : 932 – 939 .
  • McInerney , J. 2 November 1992 . “ Report of inquiry held under section 475 of the Crimes Act 1900 into the conviction of Johann Ernst Siegfried Pohl at Central Criminal Court Sydney ” . 2 November , 1973
  • Nisbett , R. E. and Wilson , T. D. 1977 . Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on memory processes . Psychological Review , 84 : 231 – 259 .
  • 1986 Criminal Procedure: The jury in a criminal trial
  • Oliver , E. and Griffitt , W. 1976 . Emotional arousal and “objective” judgment . Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society , 8 : 399 – 400 .
  • Pennington , N. and Hastie , R. 1993 . “ Inside the juror ” . 192 – 221 .
  • Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
  • Prettyman , E. B. 1960 . Jury instructions-First or last? . American Bar Association Journal , 46 : 10 – 66 .
  • Pszczynski , T. and Wrightsman , L. S. 1981 . The effects of opening statements on mock jurors' verdicts in a simulated criminal trial . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 11 : 301 – 313 .
  • 1998 R v Adey
  • 2000 R v Baptiste,
  • 1998 R v Bowhay
  • 2003 R v Hawkins and Boatswain
  • 1999 R v Kellisar
  • 1999 R v Kinkead,
  • 2002 R v MacKay,
  • 2004 R v Morehouse,
  • 1990 R v P. (R)
  • 1972 R v Salmon
  • 1993 R v Schaefler
  • 1996 R v Telford
  • 2002 R v Underwood,
  • 1999 R v Zammit
  • Schul , Y. 1993 . When warning succeeds: The effect of warning on success in ignoring invalid information . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 29 : 42 – 62 .
  • Schwartz , N. and Clore , G. 1988 . “ Affect, cognition, and social behavior ” . 44 – 62 .
  • Sealy , A. P. and Cornish , W. R. 1973 . Juries and the rules of evidence. Criminal Law Review , : 208 – 223 .
  • Semmler , C. and Brewer , N. 2002 . Effects of mood and emotion on juror processing and judgments . Behavioral Sciences and the Law , 20 : 423 – 436 .
  • Simon , R. J. 1966 . Murder, juries, and the press . Trans-action , : 64 – 65 .
  • Smith , V. L. 1991 . Impact of pretrial instruction on jurors' information processing and decisionmaking . Journal of Applied Psychology , 76 : 220 – 228 .
  • Sue , S. , Smith , R. E. and Pedroza , G. 1975 . Authoritarianis, pretrial publicity, and awareness of bias in simulated jurors . Psychological Reports , 37 : 1299 – 1302 .
  • United States v Moccia
  • United States v Treas-Wilson
  • Wegner , D. M. and Erber , R. 1992 . The hyperaccessibility of suppressed thoughts . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 68 : 903 – 912 .
  • Wegner , D. M. , Coulton , G. F. and Wenzlaff , R. 1985 . The transparency of denial: Briefing in the debriefing paradigm . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 49 : 338 – 346 .
  • Wegner , D. M. , Erber , R. and Zanakos , S. 1993 . Ironic processes in the mental control of mood and mood-related thought . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 65 : 1093 – 1104 .
  • Weinberg , H. I. and Baron , R. S. 1982 . The discredible eyewitness . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 8 : 60 – 67 .
  • Whalen , D. H. and Blanchard , F. A. 1982 . Effects of photographic evidence on mock juror judgments . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 12 : 30 – 41 .
  • Wilson , T. D. , Houston , C. E. , Etling , K. M. and Brekke , N. 1993 . A new look at anchoring effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents . Journal of Experimental Psychology , 125 : 387 – 402 .
  • Wilson , T. D. and Brekke , N. 1994 . Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations . Psychological Bulletin , 116 : 117 – 142 .
  • Wissler , R. L. and Saks , M. J. 1985 . On the inefficacy of limiting instructions . Law and Human Behavior , 9 : 37 – 48 .
  • Wolf , S. and Montgomery , D. A. 1977 . Effects of inadmissible evidence and level of judicial admonishment to disregard on the judgments of mock jurors . Journal of Applied and Social Psychology , 7 : 205 – 219 .
  • Zajonc , R. B. 1980 . Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences . American Psychologist , 35 : 151 – 175 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.