The power balance revisited: Authors, publishers and copyright in the digital sphere

REFERENCES

• Alexander, I. (2010), ‘All change for the digital economy: Copyright and business models in the early eighteenth century’, Australian Copyright Council Conference, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• American Library Association (2013), ‘Authors for library e-books’, http://www.ala.org/transforminglibraries/a4le. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government Convergence Review (2011), Convergence Review Interim Report, Canberra: Australian Government Convergence Review.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) (2012), Copyright and the Digital Economy: Issues Paper, Canberra: ALRC.
   Google Scholar
• Book Industry Strategy Group (BISG) (2011), Final Report to Government, Canberra: BISG.
   Google Scholar
• Bowrey, K. (2011), ‘The new intellectual property: Celebrity, fans and the properties of the entertainment franchise’, Griffith Law Review, 20: 1, pp. 188–220.
   Google Scholar
• Cantatore, F. (2011a), ‘Negotiating a changing landscape: Authors, copyright and the digital evolution’, Ph.D. thesis, Australia: Bond University.
   Google Scholar
• Cantatore, F. (2011b), ‘Authors, copyright and the digital evolution’, Online survey, http://www.surveymonkey.com. Accessed 13 October 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Carpignano, P., Andersen, R., Aronowitz, S. and Difazio, W. (1993), ‘Chatter in the age of electronic reproduction: Talk, television and the “public mind””, in B. Robbins (ed.), The Phantom Public Sphere, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 93–120.
   Google Scholar
• Coker, M. (2009), ‘Do authors still need publishers?’, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-coker/do-authors-still-need-pub_b_334539.html. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, S. and Higgs, P. (2010), What's your other job? A census analysis of arts employment in Australia, Australia Council: The Australia Council for the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Decherney, P. (2012), Hollywood's Copyright Wars, New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doctorow, C. (2013), ‘Libraries and e-books’, http://www.locusmag.com/Perspectives/2013/09/cory-doctorow-libraries-and-e-books/. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, I. (2012), ‘The writer's guide’, http://www.allenandunwin.com/default.aspx?page=417. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Earls, N. (2008), ‘Submission to the productivity commission’, http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/study/books/submissions#initial. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Eley, G. (1994), ‘Nations, publics, and political cultures: Placing Habermas in the nineteenth century’, in N. B. Dirks, G. Eley and S. B. Ortner (eds), Culture/Power/History: A reader in contemporary social history, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 297–335.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, A. (2012), ‘European Commission and Apple reach settlement over ebook price-fixing’ The Guardian, 15 December 2012, http://www.theguardian.com/books/2012/dec/14/european-commission-apple-ebook. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1992), 'Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy, in C. Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, Massachusetts: MIT Press, pp. 109–142.
   Google Scholar
• Gerhards, J. and Schafer, M. S. (2010), 'Is the internet a better public sphere? Comparing old and new media in the USA and Germany, New Media & Society, 12: 1, pp. 143–60, http://nms.sagepub.com. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, P. (2001), International Copyright: Principles, Law and Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, P. (2003), Copyright's Highway: From Gutenberg to the Celestial Jukebox, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Google Books Partner Program (2012), An introduction to the Google Books Partner Program, http://support.google.com/books/partner/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=106167. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1974), ‘The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964)’, New German Critique, 3: Fall, pp. 49–55.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, D. and Baker, S. L. (2008), ‘Creative work and emotional labour in the television industry’, Theory, Culture and Society, 25: 7–8, pp. 97–118.
   Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, D. and Baker, S. L. (2011), ‘“A very complicated version of freedom”: Conditions and experiences of creative labour in three cultural industries’, Variant: Cross Currents in Culture, 41, pp. 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchens, C. (2003), Unacknowledged Legislation: Writers in the Public Sphere, New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Hohendahl, P. (1974), ‘Jurgen Habermas: The public sphere (1964)’, New German Critique, 4: Fall, pp. 45–48.
   Google Scholar
• if:book Australia (2013), http://www.futureofthebook.org.au/. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• John, J. and Reid, M. A. (2011), ‘Making content pay online’, http://www.copyright.org.au/news-and-policy. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Keneally, T. (2008), ‘Submission to the Productivity Commission’, http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/study/books/submissions#initial. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Loukakis, A. (2010a), ‘E-books: Royalties and contracts’, https://asauthors.org/files/pages/ebooks_royalties_and_contracts.pdf. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Loukakis, A. (2010b), ‘Warning: More ebook loopholes’, http://www.asauthors.org/scripts/cgiip.exe/WService=ASP0016/ccms.r. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Loukakis, A. (2011), ‘Submission to the Book Industry Strategy Group’, http://www.asauthors.org/lib/pdf/zSubmissions/2011/ASA_Submission_To_BISG.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Loukakis, A. (2012), ‘Submission to the Attorney general in response to Draft Terms of Reform of the Australian Law Reform commission’, http://www.asauthors.org/lib/pdf/zSubmissions/2012/ASA%20submission%20on%20terms%20of%20reference%20for%20Copyright%20review%20by%20ALRC.pdf. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, I. (1999), ‘Copyright in the new communications environment: Balancing protection and access’, Australian Government Research Report, Redfern.
   Google Scholar
• Nix, G. (2008), ‘Submission to the productivity commission’, http://www.pc.gov.au/projects. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Nunberg, G. (1996), ‘Farewell to the information age’, in G. Nunberg (ed.), The Future of the Book, San Francisco: University of California Press, pp. 103–138.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2002), ‘The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere’, New Media & Society, 4: 1, pp. 9–27, http://nms.sagepub.com/content/4/1/9.abstract. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2008), ‘The virtual sphere 2.0: The internet, the public sphere, and beyond’, in A. Chadwick and P. Howard (eds), Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics, New York: Routledge, pp. 230–245.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002), Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission (2009), ‘Restrictions on the parallel importation of books’, Productivity Commission Research Report, Productivity Commission, Canberra, http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/study/books/report. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Quain, J. R. (2013), Apple loses e-book pricing lawsuit, but are consumers the real Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, M. A. (2011), ‘Authors create a new sub-plot in the quest to digitise the world's books’, Australian Copyright Council, http://copyright.org.au/news-and-policy/. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, M. (1988), ‘The author as proprietor: Donaldson v Becket and the genealogy of modern authorship’, Representations, 23: 1, pp. 51–85.
   Google Scholar
• Rushdie, S. (1988), Satanic Verses, London: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, D. (1992), Authorship and Copyright, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strowel, A. (2009), ‘The Google settlement: Towards a digital library or an inquisitive shopping mall?’, paper presented at CIPI-IEJE Conference, Brussels, 12 February 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (2005), ‘Qualitative case studies’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, London: Sage Publications, pp. 443–466.
   Google Scholar
• Throsby, D. and Zednik, A. (2010), ‘Do you really expect to get paid? An economic study of professional artists in Australia’, Australia Council for the Arts, Research Report.
   Google Scholar
• Vaidhayanathan, S. (2001), Copyrights & Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How it Threatens Creativity, New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S. (2011), 5 Principles for Teaching Journalism Ethics in the Digital Age, http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2011/02/5-principles-for-teaching-journa-lism-ethics-in-the-digital-age046/. Accessed 10 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. (2011), ‘The girl who saved the publisher’, The Deal, 4: 5, pp. 30–32.
   Google Scholar
• Woodmansee, M. (1984), ‘The genius and the copyright: Economic and legal conditions of the emergence of the “author””, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 17, pp. 425–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, S. (2007), The Book is Dead: Long Live the Book, Sydney: The University of New South Wales Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar