Paying attention to attention: audiences, publics, thresholds and genealogies

References

• Barthes, R. (1983), Fashion System. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. (1970), ‘Le Troisiéme Sens. Reflexion sur quelques photogrammes d'Eisenstein’, Cahiers du Cinéma, Juillet 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, S. (2002), Society under Siege. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 167–70.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. (1993), La souffrance à distance. Paris: Metailé.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P. (2003). ‘Reconfiguring Civic Culture in the New Media Milieu’, in Corner, J. and Pels, Dick (eds.), Media and the Restyling of Politics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dayan, Daniel and Katz, E. (1985), ‘Electronic Ceremonies Television Performs a Royal Wedding’, in Blonsky, M. (ed). On Signs. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dayan, Daniel (1992), ‘Les Mystéres de la Réception’, Le Débat, n° 17. Paris: Gallimard 144, p. 162.
   Google Scholar
• Dayan, Daniel (1998), ‘Le Double corps du Spectateur: Vers une définition processuelle de la notion de public’, Proulx, Serge (ed.), Accusé de Réception.: Le Téléspectateur construit par les Sciences Sociales. Québec: Presses de l'université de Laval.
   Google Scholar
• Dayan, Daniel (1999), 'Maintaining Identities, Constructing Identities: Medias & Diasporas, in Gripsrud, Jostein (ed.), Television and Common Knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dayan, Daniel (2000), ‘The Social Construction of a Film Festival’, in Bondebjerg. Ib (ed.), Moving Images, Culture and the Mind. Luton: University of Luton Press, 43, pp. 55.
   Google Scholar
• Dayan, Daniel (2001), ‘The Peculiar Public of Television’, Media, Culture & Society. London: Sage, vol. 23, no. 6 (November 2001), pp. 743–65.
   Google Scholar
• Dayan, Daniel (2002), ‘Cui Bono’, in Dayan, D. (ed.), A chacun son 11 septembre. Paris: INA. Documentation Française.
   Google Scholar
• Dayan, Daniel (2002), ‘Untimely Information. Tales of Victims in the French Media’. Partisan Review, no. 1 (Winter 2002), pp. 10:19.
   Google Scholar
• Dayan, Daniel (2003), 'Debate with Dominique Pasquier, Jean Paul Soulages and Marc Lits. Conference: La recherche en communications dans les pays francophones, University of Bucarest, July.
   Google Scholar
• Dayan, Daniel, Katz, E. and Mesquita, Mario (2003), Televisao, Publicos. Coimbra: Minerva.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. and Rabinow, P. (1982), Michel Foucault, Beyond Hermeneutics and Structuralism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1992), ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of the Actually Existing Public Sphere’, in Calhoun, C. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 109–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, Jean Marc (1989), ‘Les transformations de la publicité politique’, in Dayan, Daniel; Ferry, J. M. and Wolton, D. (eds.), Le nouvel espace public. Paris: Hermés, IV 15:27.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, J. (1992), Audiencing: A Cultural Studies Approach to Watching Television'. Poetics, 21, pp. 345–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1973), ‘Introduction’, The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. (1992), Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. (1987), ‘Invisible Fictions, Paedocracy, Pleasure’, Textual Practice, Vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 121–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. (1988), ‘The Real World of Audiences’, Critical Studies in Mass Communications, September 1988, pp. 234–38.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E. and Dayan, Daniel (2003), ‘The Public is a Crowd, the Crowd is a Public. Latter Day Notes on Lang and Lang's “MacArthur in Chicago”’, in Katz, Orloff, Liebes and Peters (eds.), Canonic Texts in Media Research. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 121–36.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, Sonia. (1990), Making Sense of Television. Oxford, Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, Sonia and Lunt, P. (1992), 'Un public critique, Un spectateur actif”, in Dayan, Daniel, A la Recherche du public. Hermès 11–1, Paris: Presses du CNRS, pp. 145–57.
   Google Scholar
• Mehl, Dominique (2003), ‘Le Témoin, figure emblématique de l'espace public-privé’, in Cefai, D. and Pasquier, D. (eds.), Les Sens du Public. Paris,:PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Merlin, Heléne (1994), Public et litterature en france au XVII° siécle. Paris: Les Belles Letters.
   Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neuman, E. (1984), The Spiral of Silence. Public Opinion, Our Social Skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. (1997), ‘Why Conversation is not the Soul of Democracy’. Critical Studies in Mass Communication. 14(4), pp. 297–309.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. (1998), The Good Citizen. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar