Visual artefacts as boundary objects in participatory research paradigm

REFERENCES

• Banks, M. (2001), Visual Methods in Social Research, 1st ed., Sage Publications Ltd, London.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. (2009), ‘”Creative” visual methods in media research: possibilities, problems and proposals’, Sage Publications, 31:4, pp. 633–652.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. (2002), ‘A critical appraisal of participatory methods in development research’, Taylor & Francis Group, 5:1, pp. 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Census of India (2001), Available at: http://www.censusindia.gov.in. Accessed 28 February 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Clark-IbáÑez, M. (2004), ‘Framing the Social World With Photo-Elicitation Interviews’, American Behavioral Scientist, 47:12, pp. 1507–1527.
   Google Scholar
• Falzone, P. (2004), ‘Transcendent ethnography. Designing an action research approach to ethnographic film within cultures of conflict’, Sage Publications, 2:3, pp. 326–344.
   Google Scholar
• Gotschi, E., Delve, R. and Freyer, B. (2009), ‘Participatory Photography as a Qualitative Approach to Obtain Insights into Farmer Groups’, Sage Publications, 21:3, pp. 290–308.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. (2007), Methods for Community Participation. A Complete Guide for Practitioners, Vistaar Publications, New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Liebenberg, L. (2009), ‘The visual image as discussion point: increasing validity in boundary crossing research’, Sage Publications, 9:4, pp. 441–467.
   Google Scholar
• Lilja, N. and Bellon, M. (2008), ‘Some common questions about participatory research: a review of the literature’, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 18:4–5, pp. 479–488.
   Google Scholar
• Pain, R. and Francis, P. (2003), ‘Reflections on participatory research’, Area, 35:1. pp. 46–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2003), ‘Interdisciplinary agendas in visual research: re-situating visual anthropology’, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, Visual Studies, 18: 2, pp. 179–192.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2007), Doing Visual Ethnography, 2nd ed., Sage Publications, London.
   Google Scholar
• Raman, V. V. (2008), ‘Examining the “e” in government and governance: A case study in alternatives from Bangalore City, India’, The Journal of Community Informatics, 4:2, ttp://www.ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/437/405. Accessed 19 May 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, S. S. (2009), ‘Role of ICTS in India Rural Communities’, The Journal of Community Informatics, 5:1, http://www.ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/313/429. Accessed 2 July 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2006), Visual Methodologies: an introduction to the interpretation of visual materials, 2nd ed., Sage Publications, London.
   Google Scholar
• Sambasivan, N. Rangaswamy, N., Cutrell, E. and Nardi, B. (2009), ‘UbiComp4D: Infrastructure and Interaction for International Development — the Case of Urban Indian Slums’, In UbiComp 2009, Sept 30 — Oct 3, 2009, Orlando, Florida, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, J. (2004), ‘Breaking the Ethnographer's Frames. Reflections on the Use of Photo Elicitation in Understanding Sri Lankan Monastic Culture’, American Behavioral Scientist, 47:12, pp. 1528–1550.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2000), Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook, 1st ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Sime, D. (2008), ‘Ethical and methodological issues in engaging young people living in poverty with participatory research methods’, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 6:1, pp. 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, R. (2004), ‘Participation in practice: making it meaningful, effective and sustainable’, Wiley InterScience, Children & Society, 18, pp. 106–118.
   Google Scholar
• Singhal, A. and Rogers, E. M. (2001), India's Communication Revolution. From Bullock Carts to Cyber Marts, Sage Publications, New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Sliwa, R. S. (ed.) (2008), Recovering Slums. Determinants of Poverty and Upward Social Mobility in Urban Slums. Case Studies from India, UNI Basel and AIDMI, Basel.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. (1989), ‘Institutional Ecology, “Translations” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology’, Sage Publications, 19:3, pp. 387–420.
   Google Scholar
• Tacchi, J., Slater, D. and Hearn, G. N. (2003), ‘Ethnographic Action Research Handbook’, UNESCO, http://eprints.qut.edu.au/4399/. Accessed 2 February 2011.
   Google Scholar
• The Challenge Of Slums: Global Report On Human Settlements (2003), United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT), http://www.unhabitat.org/pmss/listItemDetails.aspx?publicationID=1156. Accessed 1 March 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Vik, J. and Villa, M. (2010), ‘Books, Branding and Boundary Objects: On the Use of Image in Rural Development’, Blackwell Publishing, 50:2, pp. 156–170.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Burris, M. A. and Ping, X. Y. (1996), ‘Chinese village women as visual anthropologists: a participatory approach to reaching policymakers’, Social Science & Medicine (1982), 42:10, pp. 1391–1400.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Yi, W. K., Tao, Z. W. and Carovano, K. (1998), ‘Photovoice as a Participatory Health Promotion Strategy’, Health Promotion International, 13:1, pp. 75–86.
   Google Scholar