Knowledge creation, business and art: exploring the contradictions and commonalities

References

• Ahmed, S. (2005), ‘Encouraging Reuse of Design Knowledge: A Method to Index Knowledge’, Design Studies, 26, pp. 565–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, D. and Elmes, M. (1997), ‘Strategy Retold: Toward a Narrative View of Strategic Discourse’, Academy of Management Review, 22:2, pp. 429–52.
   Google Scholar
• Blackler, F. (1995), ‘Knowledge, Knowledge Work and the Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation’, Organisation Studies, 16:6, pp. 1021–46.
   Google Scholar
• Boisot, M. (1998), Knowledge Assets: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, W. D. (1982), ‘Polanyi and Instructional Method in Music’, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 16:2, pp. 75–86.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, A. (1998), ‘Knowledge Management and Innovation at 3M’, Journal of Knowledge Management, 2:1 (September), pp. 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Broens, R. and de Vries, M. (2003), ‘Classifying Technological Knowledge for Presentation to Mechanical Engineering Designers’, Design Studies, 24, pp. 457–71.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (1991), ‘Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning and Innovation’, Organization Science, 2:1, pp. 40–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (1998), ‘Organizing Knowledge’, California Management Review, 40(3), Spring, 90–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (2001), ‘Structure and Spontaneity: Knowledge and Organization’, in I. Nonaka and D. Teece (eds), Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utilization, London: Sage, pp. 44–67.
   Google Scholar
• Choo, C. W. (1998), The Knowing Organization: How Organizations Use Information to Construct Meaning, Create Knowledge, and Make Decisions, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choo, C. W. (2002), ‘Sensemaking, Knowledge Creation, and Decision Making: Organizational Knowing as Emergent Strategy’, in C. W. Choo and N. Bontis (eds), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Conner, K. R. and Prahalad, C. K. (1996), ‘A Resource-based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge vs. Opportunism’, Organization Science, 7, pp. 477–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, S.D.N. and Brown, J.S. (1999), ‘Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing’, in S. Little, P. Quintas and R. Ray (eds), Managing Knowledge: An Essential Reader, London: Sage Publications, pp. 68–101.
   Google Scholar
• Coyne, R. and Snodgrass, A. (1995), ‘Problem Setting within Prevalent Metaphors of Design’, Design Issues, 11:2, pp. 31–61.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L. (1998), Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, N. (2000), Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glisby, M. and Holden, N. (2003), ‘Contextual Constraints in Knowledge Management Theory: The Cultural Embeddedness of Nonaka's Knowledge-Creating Company’, Knowledge and Process Management, 10:1, pp. 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Gourlay, S. (2004), ‘Knowing as Semiosis: Steps towards a Reconceptualization of “Tacit Knowledge”’, in H. Tsoukas and N. Mylonoplous (eds), Organizing as Knowledge Systems: Learning, Knowledge, and Dynamic Capabilities, Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan, pp. 86–105.
   Google Scholar
• Gourlay, S. (2006a), ‘Towards Conceptual Clarity for “Tacit Knowledge”: A Review of Empirical Studies’, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 4, pp. 60–69.
   Google Scholar
• Gourlay, S. (2006b), ‘Conceptualizing Knowledge Creation: A Critique of Nonaka's Theory’, Journal of Management Studies, 43:7, pp. 1415–36.
   Google Scholar
• Gourlay, S. and Nurse, A. (2005), ‘Flaws in the “Engine” of Knowledge Creation: Nonaka's SECI Model’, in A. F. Buono and F. Poutfelt (eds), Challenges and Issues in Knowledge Management, (Research in Management Consulting), Vol. 5, Greenwich: Connecticut, Information Age Publishing, pp. 293–315.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M. (1996a), ‘Toward a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 17: Special Winter issue, pp. 109–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M. (1996b), ‘Prospering in Dynamically Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration’, Organization Science, 3, pp. 375–87.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M. (2002), ‘The Knowledge-based View of the Firm’, in C. W. Choo and N. Bontis (eds), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 133–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hedlund, G. (1994), ‘A Model of Knowledge Management and the N-Form Corporation’, Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp. 73–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobgood, B. M. (1970), ‘The Concept of Experiential Learning in the Arts’, Educational Theatre Journal, 22:1, pp. 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Kikawada, K. and Holtshouse, D. (2001), ‘The Knowledge Perspective in the Xerox Group’, in I. Nonaka and D. Teece (eds), Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utilization, London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, D. and Sensiper, S. (1998), ‘The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation’, Organization Science, 5:1, pp. 14–37.
   Google Scholar
• Luck, R. (2003), ‘Dialogue in Participatory Design’, Design Studies, 24, pp. 523–35.
   Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998), ‘Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage’, Academy of Management Review, 23:2, pp. 242–66.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, S., Robertson, M., Scarborough, H. and Swan, J. (2002), Managing Knowledge Work, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Niedderer, K. (2007), ‘Mapping the Meaning of Knowledge in Design Research’, Design Inquiries (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. (1991), The Knowledge Creating Company, Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96–104.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. and Konno, N. (1998), ‘The Concept of Ba: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation’, California Management Review Spring, 40:3, pp. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. and Konno, N. (1995), ‘The Knowledge Creating Company’, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. and Konno, N. (2000), ‘SECI, Ba, and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation’, Long Range Planning, 33:1, pp. 5–34.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, J. E. (1990), ‘Sharing Knowledge, Celebrating Identity: Community Memory in a Service Culture’, in D. Middleton and D. Edwards (eds), Collective Remembering, London: Sage, pp. 169–89.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1958), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1962), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1966), The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1969), in M. Greene (ed.), Knowing and Being: Essays by Michael Polanyi, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, T. and Clegg, S. (2005), ‘Tacit Knowing, Communication and Power: Lessons from Japan’, in S. Little and T. Ray (eds), Managing Knowledge: An Essential Reader, London: Sage Publications, pp. 319–49.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, C. (2004), ‘Design Enquiry: Tacit Knowledge and Innovation in Science’, Design Issues, 20:4, pp. 76–85.
   Google Scholar
• Rynes, S.L., Bartunek, J.M., and Daft, R.L. (2001), ‘Across the Great Divide: Knowledge Creation and Transfer between Practitioners and Academics’, Academy of Management Journal, 44:2, pp. 340–57.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, R. (2003), ‘Managing Knowledge into Competence: The Five Learning Cycles of the Competent Organization’, in R. Sanchez (ed.), Knowledge Management and Organizational Competence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–37.
   Google Scholar
• Sorri, M. (1994), ‘The Body Has Reasons: Tacit Knowledge in Thinking and Making’, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 28:2, pp. 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Spender, J. C. (1996), ‘Managing Knowledge: The Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the Firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 17: S2, pp. 45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey, R. D. (2001), Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations: Learning and Knowledge Creation, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, R. D. (2003), Strategic Management and Organizational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity, 3rd edn, London: FT Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Stempfle, J. and Badke-Schaub, P. (2002), ‘Thinking In Design Teams: An Analysis of Team Communication’, Design Studies, 23:5, pp. 473–96.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H. (2003), ‘Do We Really Understand Tacit Knowledge?’ in M. Easterby-Smith and M. Lyles (eds), The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 410–27.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. (1994), ‘Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem-solving: Implications for Innovation’, Management Science, 40, pp. 429–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K. and Nonaka, I. (2000), Enabling Knowledge Creation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998), Communities of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2000), ‘Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems’, Organization, 7:2, pp. 225–46.
   Google Scholar
• Yolles, M. (2000), ‘Organizations, Complexity, and Viable Knowledge Management’, Kybernetics, 29:9/10, pp. 1202–22.
   Google Scholar