Towards a Criticality in the Now

References

• Balkema, A. W. and Slager, H. (eds) (2004), Artistic Research, Amsterdam: Lier en Boog.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, P. and Godfrey, M. (2006), ‘Learning Experience’, Frieze, 101, pp. 169–73.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. ([1970] 1977), ‘Musica Practica’, in S. Heath (ed.), Image-Music-Text (trans. S. Heath), London: Fontana Press, pp. 149–54.
   Google Scholar
• Berland, J., Straw, W. and Thomas, D. (eds) (1996), Theory Rules: Art as Theory/Theory and Art, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgin, V. (1986), ‘The End of Art Theory’, in The End of Art Theory: Criticism and Postmodernity, Houndmills: Macmillan Education, pp. 140–204.
   Google Scholar
• Bürger, P. ([1974] 2004), Theory of the Avant-Garde (trans. M. Shaw), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cassar, I. (2008), ‘How to use Parasites: Notes on Contemporary Art, Curating and the Work of the Context’, Parallax, 14:4, pp. 30–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. ([1982] 1995), ‘The Almost Nothing of the Unpresentable’, in E. Weber (ed.), Points…Interviews, 1974–1994 (trans. P. Kamuf et al.), Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 78–88.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. ([1967] 1997), Of Grammatology (trans. G. C. Spivak), Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. ([1995] 2001), ‘I Have a Taste for the Secret’, in G. Donis and D. Webb (eds.), A Taste for the Secret (trans. G. Donis), Cambridge: Polity, pp. 1–92.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, J. (ed.) (2009), Artists with PhDs: On the New Doctoral Degree in Studio Art, Washington: New Academia Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, J. and Newman, M. (eds) (2008), The State of Art Criticism, New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Groys, B. (2000), Unter Verdacht: Eine Phänomenologie der Medien, Munich and Vienna: Hanser.
   Google Scholar
• Groys, B. et al. (2008), ‘First Roundtable’, in J. Elkins and M. Newman (eds), The State of Art Criticism, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 129–79.
   Google Scholar
• Hannula, M., Suoranta, J. and Vadén, T. (2005), Artistic Research: Theories, Methods and Practice, Helsinki and Gothenburg: Academy of Fine Arts and University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, C. and Orton, F. (1982), ‘The Modernization of English Art’, in A Provisional History of Art & Language, Paris: Fabre, pp. 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kiljunen, S. and Hannula, M. (eds) (2002), Artistic Research, Helsinki: Academy of Fine Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. ([1973] 1998), in J. A. Miller (ed.), The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis (trans. A. Sheridan), London: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Macleod, K. and Holdridge, L. (2002), ‘The Enactment of Thinking: Creative Practice Research Degrees’, Journal of Visual Art Practice, 2:1/2, pp. 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Macleod, K. and Holdridge, L. (eds) (2005), Thinking through Art: Reflections on Art as Research, New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McQuillan, M. (2007), ‘Karl Marx and the Philosopher's Stone, or, On Theory and Practice’, in The Politics of Deconstruction: Jacques Derrida and the Other of Philosophy, London and Ann Arbor: Pluto Press, pp. 235–53.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, C. and Stephanson, A. ([1987] 1994), ‘Interview with Craig Owens’, in S. Bryson et al. (eds), Beyond Recognition: Representation, Power, and Culture, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 298–315.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, G. ([1988] 2003), Vision and Difference: Feminism, Femininity and the Histories of Art, London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Read, H. ([1931] 1958), ‘The Place of Art in a University’, in Education Through Art, London: Faber, pp. 256–64.
   Google Scholar
• Rifkin, A. (2000), Ingres Then, and Now, London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rochlitz, R. ([1994] 2008), Subversion and Subsidy: Contemporary Art and Aesthetics (trans. D. Roberts), Greenford: Seagull.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, I. (2006), ‘Academy as Potentiality’, in A. Nollert, I. Rogoff, B. de Baere, et al. (eds), A.C.A.D.E.M.Y, Frankfurt am Main: Revolver, pp. 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, I. ([2004] 2008), ‘What is a Theorist?’, in J. Elkins and M. Newman, The State of Art Criticism, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 97–109.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, H. (1972), ‘Educating Artists’, in The De-definition of Art, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, C., Mottram, J. and Till, J. (2007), ‘AHRC Research Review: Practice-Led Research in Art, Design and Architecture’, http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/About/Policy/Documents/Practice-Led_Review_Nov07.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, R. (1983), How the PhD came to Britain: A Century of Struggle for Postgraduate Education, Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tagg, J. and Lukitsh, J. (1992), ‘Practising Theories’, in J. Tagg, Grounds of Dispute: Art History, Cultural Politics and the Discursive Field, Houndmills and London: Macmillan, pp. 62–96.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2007), ‘Poststructuralism, Theory and Practice’, in H. van Koten (ed.), Reflections on Creativity: Exploring the Role of Theory in Creative Practices, Dundee: Duncan of Jordanstone College.
   Google Scholar
• Wollheim, R. (1987), ‘What the Artist does’, in Painting as an Art, London: Thames and Hudson, pp. 13–42.
   Google Scholar