References
- Bernardi R. (2002). The need for true controversies in psychoanalysis. Int. J Psychoanal. 83: 851–73.
- Epstein R. (2000). Epistemological questions on current psychoanalysis. Paper presented at: 40 Congreso Latinoamericano de Psicoanálisis, FEPAL, Gramado, September 3‐9.
- Epstein R. (2003). The frontiers and the psychoanalytic disciplinary matrix: Epistemological analysis of the hermeneutic and the scientific stances. Psicoanálisis 25:93–103.
- Epstein R. (2004). Psychoanalysis: ‘Science’ of hermeneutics. Paper presented at: 26th Annual Symposium of the Buenos Aires Psychoanalytic Association, Buenos Aires, October 28‐30.
- Epstein R., Murillo M. (2002). Theoretical pluralism: Frontiers and metapsychology. Paper presented at: 41 Congreso Latinomericano de Psicoanálisis, FEPAL, Montevideo, September 22‐8.
- Freud S. (1926). The question of lay analysis. SE 20, p. 183–250.
- Green A. (2005). The illusion of common ground and mythical pluralism. Int J Psychoanal 86: 627–32.
- Wallerstein RS (2005a). Will psychoanalytic pluralism be an enduring state of our discipline? Int J Psychoanal 86:623–6.
- Wallerstein RS (2005b). Dialogue or illusion? How we go from here? Int J Psychoanal 86:633–8.
- Green A. (2005). The illusion of common ground and mythical pluralism. Int J Psychoanal 86: 627–32.
- Wallerstein RS (2005a). Will psychoanalytic pluralism be an enduring state of our discipline? Int J Psychoanal 86:623–6.
- Wallerstein RS (2005b). Dialogue or illusion? How we go from here? Int J Psychoanal 86:633–8.