The preconscious and psychic change in Fairbairn's model of mind

References

• Balint M. (1958). The three areas of the mind‐Theoretical considerations. Int J Psychoanal 39:328–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton R. (1989). The missing link. In: The Oedipus complex to‐day. London : Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Cavell M. (1998). Triangulation, one's own mind and objectivity. Int J Psychoanal 79:449–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civin M., Lombardi K. (1990). The preconscious and potential space. Psychoanal Rev 77:573–85.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn WRD (1940). Schizoid factors in the personality. In: Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. London : Routledge, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn WRD (1943). The repression and return of bad objects. In: Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. London : Routledge, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn WRD (1944). Endopsychic structure considered in terms of object‐relationship. In: Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. London : Routledge, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn WRD (1952). Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. London : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn WRD (1953). Psychoanalysis and art. In: Scharff D., Fairbairn birtles E., editors. Instinct to self, 2 vols, p. 423–32. London : Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn WRD (1954). Observations on the nature of hysterical states. Br J Med Psychol 27:105–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn WRD (1963). Synopsis of an object‐relations theory of the personality. Int J Psychoanal 44:224–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferenczi S. (1928). The elasticity of psycho‐analytical technique. In: Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho‐analysis. London : Maresfield Library, Karnac Books, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S. (1914). On narcissism. SE 14.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S. (1915). The unconscious. SE 14.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S. (1917 [1915]). A metapsychological supplement to the theory of dreams. SE 14.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg J. (1991). Oedipus and beyond. London : Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grotstein JS (1998). A comparison of Fairbairn's endopsychic structure and Klein's internal world. In: Skolnick NJ, Scharff DE, editors. Fairbairn, then and now. London : The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kris E. (1950). On preconscious mental processes. Psychoanal Q 19:540–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macmurray J. (1939). Boundaries of science. London : Faber & Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Milner M. (1987). The suppressed madness of sane men. London : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell SA (1994), The origin and nature of the ‘object’ in the theories of Klein and Fairbairn. In: Grotstein JS, Rinsley DB, editors. Fairbairn and the origins of object relations. London : Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden T. (1994). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. Int J Psychoanal 75:3–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padel J. (1985). Ego in current thinking. Int Rev Psychoanal 12:273–83.
   Google Scholar
• Padel J. (1991). Fairbairn's thoughts on the relationship of inner and outer worlds. Free Associations 2(24):589–617.
   Google Scholar
• Padel J. (1994). ‘Narcissism' in Fairbairn's theory of personality structure. In: Grotstein JS, Rinsley DB, editors. Fairbairn and the origins of object relations. London : Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rickman J. (1950). The factor of number in individual and group dynamics. J Mental Science 96:770–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickman J. (1951a). Methodology and research in psycho‐pathology. Br J Med Psychol 24:1–7. Also in: Rickman J. Selected contributions to psycho‐analysis. London: Hogarth, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Rickman J. (1951b). Number and the human sciences. In: Psycho‐analysis and culture. New York : Int. Univ. Press. Also in: Rickman J. Selected contributions to psycho‐analysis. London: Hogarth, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Roheim G. (1930). Animism, magic and the divine king. London : Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Rubens R. (1984). The meaning of structure in Fairbairn. Int Rev Psychoanal 11:428–40.
   Google Scholar
• Rubens R. (1994). Fairbairn's structural theory. In: Grotstein JS, Rinsley DB, editors. Fairbairn and the origins of object relations. London : Free Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubens R. (1996). Review essay: The unique origins of Fairbairn's theories. Psychoanal Dialog 6:413–35.
   Google Scholar
• Rubens R. (1998). Fairbairn's theory of depression. In: Skolnick NJ, Scharff DE, editors. Fairbairn, then and now. London : The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler J., Holder A., Dare C., Dreher AU (1997). Freud's models of the mind. London : Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Scharff DE, Fairbairn birtles E. (1994). From instinct to self, 2 vols. London : Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Scharff DE, Fairbairn birtles E. (1997). From instinct to self: The evolution and implications of WRD Fairbairn's theory of object relations. Int J Psychoanal 78:1085–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolnick NJ (1998). The good, the bad and the ambivalent: Fairbairn's difficulty locating the good object in the endopsychic structure. In: Skolnick NJ, Scharff DE, editors. Fairbairn, then and now. London : The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright K. (1991). Vision and separation. London : Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Young RM [Internet]. What is psychoanalytic studies? Human Nature Review; 1998 [cited 2005 Jan 12]. Available from http:www.human‐nature.comrmyoungpapers.
   Google Scholar