Applications of genetic algorithms to drug design

Bibliography

• OSHIRO CM, KUNTZ ID, DIXON JS: Flexible ligand dock- ing using a genetic algorithm. J Comput. Aided Mot. Des. (1995) 9:113–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HOLLAND JH: Genetic algorithms. Scientific American (1992) 7:44–50.
   Google Scholar
• HOLLAND JH: Adaption in Natural and Artificial Systems (2nd Edition). MIT Press, Cambridge MA, (1992).
   Google Scholar
• CLARK DE, WESTHEAD DR: Evolutionary algorithms in computer-aided molecular design. J. Comput -AidedMol. Des. (1996) 10:337-358. Excellent recent review on GAs and EAs from a computer design point of view.
   Google Scholar
• CART WRIGHT HM: Genetic algorithms. In: Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Chemistry Oxford Science Publica-tions, New York (1993) 62–89. Good introductory book for basic understanding of GAs.
   Google Scholar
• AXCELIS, INC. Evolver 3.0. The Genetic Algorithm Problem Solver. User Manual.
   Google Scholar
• LEVIN M: Use of Genetic algorithms to solve biomedical problems. MD Computing (1995) 12:193–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WILLETT P: Genetic algorithms in molecular recognition and design. Trends Biotechnol (1995) 13:516–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DEVILLIERS J: Genetic algorithms in Molecular Modelling Academic Press, London, UK (1996).
   Google Scholar
• VAN DE WATERBEEMD H, EL TAYAR N, CARRUPT PA, TESTA B: Pattern recognition study of QSAR substituent descriptors. J. Comput -Aided Mol. Des. (1989) 3:11–132.
   Google Scholar
• KUBINYI H: Variable selection in QSAR studies. 1. Anevolutionary algorithm. Quant. Struct - Act. Relat (1994) 13:285–294.
   Google Scholar
• KUBINYI H: Variable selection in QSAR studies. 2. A highly efficient combination of systematic search and evolution. Quant Struct -Act. Relat (1994) 13:393–401.
   Google Scholar
• KUBINYI H: Evolutionary variable selection in regres-sion and PLS analyses. J. Chemomet. (1996) 10:119–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ROGERS D, HOPFINGER AJ: Application of genetic func-tion approximation to quantitative structure -activity relationships and quantitative structure property rela-tionships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput Sci. (1994) 34:854–866.
   Google Scholar
• LUKE BT: Evolutionary programs applied to the devel-opment of quantitative structure-activity relationships and quantitative structure-property relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput Sci. (1994) 34:1279–87.
   Google Scholar
• YAO X: A review of evolutionary neural networks. Int. J. Intel]. Syst (1993) 8:539–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SO SS, KARPLUS M: Evolutionary optimization in quan-titative structure-activity relationship: an application of genetic neural networks. J. Med. Chem. (1996) 39:1521–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SO SS, KARPLUS M: Genetic neural networks for quanti-▪tative structure-activity relationships: Improvements and application of benzodiazepine affinity for ben-zodiazepine/GABAA receptors. J. Med. Chem. (1996) 39:5246-56. A good paper on combining GAs with neural networks.
   Google Scholar
• KYNGAS J, VALJAKKA J: Evolutionary neural networks in quantitative structure-activity relationships of dihy-drofolate reductase inhibitors. Quant Struct - Act. Relat. (1996) 15:296–301.
   Google Scholar
• HIBBERT DB: A hybrid genetic algorithm for the estima-tion of kinetic parameters. Chemomet. Intel]. Lab. Syst (1993) 19:319–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LE BRET C: Rebuilding connectivity matrices from two-atom fragments using the genetic algprithm. J. Chem. Inf. Comput Sci. (1996) 36:678–683.
   Google Scholar
• JUDSON RS, JEAGER EP, TREASURYWALA AM, PETERSON ML: Conformational searching methods for small mole-cules. 2. Genetic algorithm approach. J. Comput. Chem. (1993) 14:1407-14. Start of a series of good papers on GAs in conformational searching.
   Google Scholar
• MEZA JC, JUDSON RS, FAULKNER RS, TREASURYWALA AM: A comparison of a direct search method and a genetic algorithm for conformational searching. J. Comput Chem. (1996) 17:1142–1151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XIAO YL, WILLIAMS DE: GAME: genetic algorithm for minimisation of energy, an interactive program for three dimensional intermolecular interactions. Com-put. Chem. (1994) 18:199–201.
   Google Scholar
• NOTREDAME C, HIGGINS DG: SAGA: sequence alignment by genetic algorithm. Nuc. Acids Res. (1996) 24:1515–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEIN J: An algorithm combining DNA and protein alignment. J. Theoret. Biol. (1994) 167:169–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PARSONS R, JOHNSON ME: DNA sequence assembly and genetic algorithms new results and puzzling insights. ISMB (1995) 3:277–84.
   Google Scholar
• BENEDETTI G, MOROSETTI S: A genetic algorithm tosearch for optimal and suboptimal RNA secondary structures. Biophys. Chem. (1995) 55: 253–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SCHUSTER P: How to search for RNA structures. Theo-retical concepts in evolutionary biotechnology. J. Biotechnol. (1995) 41:239–57.
   Google Scholar
• GULTYAEV AP, VAN BATENBURG FH, PLEIJ CW: Thecomputer simulation of RNA folding pathways using a genetic algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. (1995) 250:37–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VAN BATENBURG FH, GULTYAEV AP, PLEIJ CW : An APL-programmed genetic algorithm for the prediction of RNA secondary structure.' 7heor. Biol. (1995) 174:269–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OGATA H, AKIYAMAY, KANEHISA M: A genetic algorithmbased molecular modeling technique for RNA stem-loop structures. Nuc. Acids Res. (1995) 23:419–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PEDERSON JT, MOULT J: Genetic algorithms for proteinstructure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. (1996) 6:227–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RABOW AA, SCHERA GA HA: Imp roved genetic algorithmfor the protein biding problem by use of a Cartesian combination operator. Prot. Sci (1996) 5:1800–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BEUTLER TC, DILL KA: A fast conformational search strategy for finding low energy structures of model proteins. Prot. Sci. (1996) 5:2037–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BECKERS MLM, DERKS EPPA, MEISSEN WJ, BUYDENS LMC: Parallel processing of chemical information in a local area network - III Using genetic algorithms for confor-mational analysis of biomacromolecules. Comput. Chem. (1996) 20:449–457.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DELCARPIO CA: A parallel genetic algorithm for polypeptide three dimensional structure prediction - a transputer implementation. J. Chem. Informat Comp. ScL (1996) 36:258–269.
   Google Scholar
• DESJARLAIS JR, HANDEL TM: De novo design of the hydrophobic cores of proteins. Protein Sci. (1995) 4:2006–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STRYNADKA BS, EISENSTIN M, KATCHALSKI-KATZIR E et al: Molecular docking programs successfully predict the binding of a beta-lactamase inhibitory protein to TEM-1 beta-lactamase. Nat Struct Biol. (1996) 3:233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SHOICHET BK, KUNTZ ID: Predicting the structure of protein complexes - a step in the right direction. Chem. Biol. (1996) 3:151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WALTERS DE, HINDS RM: Genetically evolved receptor models: a computational approach to construction of receptor models. J. Med. Chem. (1994) 37:2527-36 Very interesting approach to design of receptor models. Probably the way of the future.
   Google Scholar
• JONES G, WILLETT P, GLEN RC: A genetic algorithm for flexible molecular overlay and pharmacophore eluci-dation. J. Comput Aided. Mol. Das (1995) 9:532–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WILD DJ, WILLETT P: Similarity in files of three-dimen-sional chemical structures. Alignment of molecular electrostatic potential fields with a genetic algorithm. J. Chem. Inf Comput Sci (1996) 36:159-167. Very interesting approach probably very useful in the future.
   Google Scholar
• THOMPSON LA, ELLMAN JA: Synthesis and applications of small molecule libraries. Chem. Rev. (1996) 96:555-600. Solid review showing the future promise of this technique.
   Google Scholar
• GORDON EM, GALLOP MA, PATEL DV: Strategy and tactics in combinatorial organic synthesis - applications to drug discovery. Acc. Chem. Res. (1996) 29:144–154.
   Google Scholar
• GLEN RC, PAYNE AWE. A genetic algorithm for the automated generation of molecules within constraints. J. Comp. -Aided Mol. Des. (1995) 9:181–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WESTHEAD DR, CLARK DE, FRENKEL D et al.: PRO LI-GAND: an approach to de novo molecular design. 3. A genetic algorithm for structure refinement. J. Comput - Aided Mol. Des. (1995) 9:139–48.
   Google Scholar
• SCHNEIDER G, SCHUCHHARDT J, VVREDE P: Peptide de- ▪sign in machina: development of artificial mitochon- drial protein precursor cleavage sites by simulated molecular evolution. Biophys. J. (1995) 68:434-47. Shows lots of promise for future in computro studies.
   Google Scholar
• SCHNEIDER G, SCHUCHFIARDT J, WREDE P: Evolutionary optimisation in multimodal search space. Biol. Cybern. (1996) 74:203–7.
   Google Scholar
• VENKATSUBRAMANIAN V, CHAN K, CARUTHERS JM: Evo-lutionary design of molecules with desired properties using the genetic algorithm. J. Chem. Inf. Comput Sci. (1995) 35:188–195.
   Google Scholar
• SHERIDAN RP, KEARSLEY SK:Using a genetic algorithm to suggest combinatorial libraries. J. Chem. Inf. Comput Sci. (1995) 35:310–320.
   Google Scholar