The identification of G-protein coupled receptors in sequence databases

Bibliography

• BOCKAERT J: G-proteins and G-protein-coupled recep- tors: structure, function and interactions. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol (1991) 1(1):32–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• •A concise GPCR review describing diversity of structure and function of various members of different families, including G-proteins themselves.
   Google Scholar
• KOLAKOWSKI LJ JR: GCRDb: a G-protein-coupled recep- tor database. Receptors Channels (1994) 2(0:1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ••A summary of the database implementation, data collection,and query system utilised to create this vital GPCR database, found on the web at www.gcrdb.uthscsa.edu
   Google Scholar
• PROBST WC, SNYDER LA, SCHUSTER DI, BROSIUS J, SEAL- FON SC: Sequence alignment of the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. DNA Cell Biol (1992) 11 (1) :1–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ••An excellent GPCR review describing general structural fea-tures, ligand binding domains, intracellular coupling and general evolutionary concepts of GPCRs. In addition, it is one of the few papers which include an extensive alignment of members of different families of GPCRs.
   Google Scholar
• LEFKOWITZ RJ, CARON MG: Adrenergic receptors. Mod-els for the study of receptors coupled to guanine nu-cleotide regulatory proteins. J. Biol. Chem. (1988) 263 (11) 4993–4996.
   Google Scholar
• DOHLMAN HB, BOUVIER M, BENOVIC JL, CARON MG, LEFKOWITZ RJ: The multiple membrane spanning to-pography of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor. Localiza-tion of the sites of binding, glycosylation, and regulatory phosphorylation by limited proteolysis. Biol. Chem. (1987) 262 (29) :14282–14288.
   Google Scholar
• STRADER CD, SIGAL IS, DIXON RA: Structural basis of beta-adrenergic receptor function. FASEB 1 (1989) 3 (7) :1825–1832.
   Google Scholar
• •A seminal paper with one of the first descriptions of structure-function relationships with a GPCR receptor.
   Google Scholar
• LOOSFELT H, MISRAHI M, ATGER M et al.: Cloning and se-quencing of porcine LH-hCG receptor cDNA: variants lacking transmembrane domain. Science (1989) 245(4917) :525–528.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PARMENTIER M, LIBERT F, MAENHAUT C et al: Molecularcloning of the thyrotropin receptor. Science (1989) 246(4937) :1620–1622.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SPRENGEL R, BRAUN T, NIOLICS K, SEGALOFF DL, SEE-BURG PH: The testicular receptor for follicle stimulat-ing hormone: structure and functional expression of cloned cDNA. Mol Endocrinol (1990) 4(4)525–530.
   Google Scholar
• MAENHAUT C, VAN SANDE J, LIBERT F et al.: RDC8 codes for an adenosine A2 receptor with physiological con-stitutive activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. (1990) 173 (3) :1169–1178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LIBERT F, PARMENTIER M, LEFORT A et al: Selective am-plification and cloning of four new members of the G-protein-coupled receptor family. Science (1989) 244 (4904) :569–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OKAMOTO T, KATADA T, MURAYAMA Y et al: A simple structure encodes G-protein-activating function of the IGF-II/mannose 6-phosphate receptor. Cell (1990) 62(0709–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •An interesting description showing that a receptor with a single transmembrane domain can stimulate a G-protein.
   Google Scholar
• MORGAN DO, EDMAN JC, STANDRING et al.: Insulin-like growth factor II receptor as a multifunctional binding protein. Nature (1987) 329 (6137) :301-307. (Erratum ap-pears in Nature (1988) 20 (7) :442) .
   Google Scholar
• HIBERT MF, TRUMPP-KALLMEYER S, HOFLACK J, BRUIN-VELS A: This is not a G-protein-coupled receptor. Trends Pharmacol. ScL (1993) 14(0:7–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KORNFELD R, KORNFELD S: Assembly of asparagine-linked oligosaccharides. Ann. Rev. Biochem. (1985) 54:631–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DIXON RA, SIGAL IS, RANDS E et al: Ligand binding to the beta-adrenergic receptor involves its rhodopsin-like core. Nature (1987) 326(6108):73–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LILES WC, NATHANSON NM: Regulation of neuronal muscarinic acetylcholine receptor number by protein glycosylation. j Neurochem. (1986) 46(1)89–95.
   Google Scholar
• RUSSO D, CHAZENBALK GD, NAGAYAMA Y, WAD-SWORTH HL, RAPOPORT B: Site-directed mutagenesis of the human thyrotropin receptor: role of asparagine-linked oligosaccharides in the expression of a functional receptor. Mol. Endocrinol (1991) 5(1):29–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FINDLAY J, ELIOPOULOS E: Three-dimensional model-ling of G-protein-linked receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. (1990) 11(12):492–499. (Erratum appears in Trends Pharmacol. Sci. (1991) 12(3):81).
   Google Scholar
• HIBERT MF, TRUMPP-KALLMEYER S, BRUINVELS A, HO-FLACK J: Three-dimensional models of neurotransmit-ter G-binding protein-coupled receptors. Mol. Pharmacol (1991) 40(1):8–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• YOKOTA Y, SASAI Y, TANAKA K et al.: Molecular charac-terization of a functional cDNA for rat substance P re-ceptor. J. Biol. Chem. (1989) 264(30):17649–17652.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DIXON RA, SIGAL IS, STRADER CD: Structure-functionanalysis of the beta-adrenergic receptor. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology (1988) 53(Pt 1):487–497.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'DOWD BJ, HNATOWICH M, REGAN JW et al.: Site-directed mutagenesis of the cytoplasmic domains of the human beta 2-adrenergic receptor. Localization of regions involved in G-protein-receptor coupling. J. Biol. Chem. (1988) 263(30:15985–15992.
   Google Scholar
• KARNIK SS, SAKMAR TP, CHEN HB, KHORANA HG: Cys-teine residues 110 and 187 are essential for the forma-tion of correct structure in bovine rhodopsin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1988) 85 (22):8459–8463.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• JACKSON T: Structure and function of G-protein cou-pled receptors. Pharmacol. Ther. (1991) 50 (3) :425–442.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DE WIED D: Neuropeptides: Basics and Perspectives. El-sevier, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford (1990).
   Google Scholar
• BURBACH JP, MEIJER OC: The structure of neuropeptide receptors. Eur. j Pharmacol (1992) 227(1):1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GAO JL, MURPHY PM: Cloning and differential tissue-specific expression of three mouse beta chemokine receptor-like genes, including the gene for a func-tional macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha re-ceptor. J. Biol. Chem. (1995) 270(29) :17494–17501.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DOHLMAN HG, THORNER J, CARON MG, LEFKOWITZ RJ:Model systems for the study of seven-transmembrane-segment receptors. Ann. Rev. Biochem. (1991) 60:653–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STRADER CD, SIGAL IS, CANDELORE MR etal. Conserved aspartic acid residues 79 and 113 of the beta-adrenergic receptor have different roles in receptor function. J. Biol. Chem (1988) 263 (21) 10267–10271
   Google Scholar
• FRASER CM, WANG CD, ROBINSON DA, GOCAYNE JD,VENTER JC: Site-directed mutagenesis of ml muscar-inic acetylcholine receptors: conserved aspartic acids play important roles in receptor function. Mol. Phar-macol (1989) 36(6):840–847.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WANG CD, BUCK MA, FRASER CM: Site-directed muta-genesis of alpha 2A-adrenergic receptors: identifica-tion of amino acids involved in ligand binding and receptor activation by agonists. Mol. Pharmacol (1991) 40(2):168–179.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• •This reference indicates that although mutagenesis results are compelling, some flexibility in the interaction exists and care should be taken in over-interpreting such results.
   Google Scholar
• WANG CD, GALLAHER TK, SHIH JC: Site-directed muta-genesis of the serotonin 5-hydroxytrypamine2 recep-tor: identification of amino acids necessary for ligand binding and receptor activation. Mol. Pharmacol (1993) 43(6)931–940.
   Google Scholar
• HO BY, KARSCHIN A, BRANCHEK T, DAVIDSON N, LES-TER HA: The role of conserved aspartate and serine residues in ligand binding and in function of the 5-HT1A receptor: a site-directed mutation study. FEBS Lett. (1992) 312(2-3):259–262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GANTZ I, DELVALLE J, WANG LD et al.: Molecular basis for the interaction of histamine with the histamine 112 receptor. J. Biol. Chem. (1992) 267(29):20840–20843.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CURTIS CA, WHEATLEY M, BANSAL S et al.: Propylben-zilylcholine mustard labels an acidic residue in trans-membrane helix 3 of the muscarinic receptor. J. Biol. Chem. (1989) 264(0:489–495.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SPALDIN TA, BIRDSALL NJ, CURTIS CA, HULME EC: Ace-tylcholine mustard labels the binding site aspartate in muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. J. Biol. Chem. (1994) 269(6)4092–4097.
   Google Scholar
• POLLOCK NJ, MANELLI AM, HUTCHINS CS et al.: Serinemutations in transmembrane V of the dopamine D1 re-ceptor affect ligand interactions and receptor activa-tion. J. Biol. Chem. (1992) 267(25):17780–17786.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TRUMPP-KALLMEYER S, HOFLACK J, BRUINVELS A, HIBERT M: Modeling of G-protein-coupled receptors: application to dopamine, adrenaline, serotonin, ace-tylcholine, and mammalian opsin receptors. J. Med. Chem. (1992) 35(19):3448–3462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CHOUDHARY MS, CRAIGO S, ROTH BL A single point mutation (Phe34° - Leu340) of a conserved phen- ylalanineabolishes44125Iliodo-(2,5-dimethoxy)phenylisopropylamine and [311]mesuler-gine but not [311]ketanserin binding to 5-hydroxytryptamine2 receptors. Mol Pharmacol (1993) 43(5) 755–761
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CHOW, TAYLOR LP, MANSOUR A, AKIL H: Hydrophobicresidues of the D2 dopamine receptor are important for binding and signal transduction. J. Neurochem. (1995) 65(5):2105–2115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WESS J, GDULA D, BRANN MR: Site-directed mutagene-sis of the m3 muscarinic receptor: identification of a series of threonine and tyrosine residues involved in © Ashley Publications Ltd. All rights reserved.Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents (1998) 8(3) agonist but not antagonist binding. EMBO 1 (1991) 10(12)3729–3734.
   Google Scholar
• •These results indicate that one can substitute some key resi-dues but retain binding of the endogenous agonist which again stresses the importance of not discarding sequences where conservative substitutions of such residues exist.
   Google Scholar
• WESS J, MAGGIO R, PALMER JR, VOGEL Z: Role of con-served threonine and tyrosine residues in acetylcho-line binding and muscarinic receptor activation. A study with m3 muscarinic receptor point mutants. J. Biol. Chem. (1992) 267(27):19313–19319.
   Google Scholar
• BLUMI K, MUTSCHLER E, WESS J: Identification of an in-tracellular tyrosine residue critical for muscarinic receptor-mediated stimulation of phosphatidylinosi-tol hydrolysis. J. Biol. Chem. (1994) 269(0:402–405.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BLUML K, MUTSCHLER E, WESS J: Functional role of a cy-toplasmic aromatic amino acid in muscarinic receptor-mediated activation of phospholipase C. J. Biol. Chem. (1994) 269(15):11537–11541.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ATTWOOD TK, BECK ME, BLEASBY AJ, PARRY-SMITH DJ: PRINTS - a database of protein motif fingerprints. Nu-cleic Acids Res. (1994) 22(17):3590–3596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'HARA KM, THOMSEN C, GILBERT TL, MULVIHILL ER: The ligand-binding domain in metabotropic glutamate receptors is related to bacterial periplasmic binding proteins. Neuron (1993) 11(0:41–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TAKAHASHI K, TSUCHIDA K, TANABE Y, MASU M, NAKANISHI S: Role of the large extracellular domain of metabotropic glutamate receptors in agonist selectiv-ity determination. J. Biol. Chem. (1993) 268(26)19341–19345.
   Google Scholar
• ALTSCHUL SF, GISH W, MILLER W, MYERS EW, LIPMAN DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. (1990) 215 (3) :403–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LIPMAN DJ, PEARSON WR: Rapid and sensitive protein similarity searches. Science (1985) 227 (4693) 1435–1441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEARSON WR, LIPMAN DJ: Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. ScL USA (1988) 85 (8) :2444–2448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BURKS C: Molecular biology databases. In: DNA and Pro-tein Sequence Analysis. Bishop MJ, J, RC (Eds.), Oxford Uni-versity Press, Oxford (1997) 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• BAIROCH A, BUCHER P: PROSITE: recent develop-ments. Nucleic Acids Res. (1994) 22(17)3583–3589.
   Google Scholar
• HORN F, WEARE J, BEUKERS MW et al.: GPCRDB: an in-formation system for G-protein-coupled receptors. Nucleic Acids Res. (1998). (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• HENIKOFF S, HENIKOFF JG: Automated assembly of protein blocks for database searching. Nucleic Acids Res. (1991) 19(23):6565–6572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HENIKOFF JG, HENIKOFF S: Blocks database and its ap-plications. Meth. Enzymol (1996) 266:88–105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TATUSOV RL, ALTSCHUL SF, KOONIN EV: Detection of conserved segments in proteins: iterative scanning of sequence databases with alignment blocks. Proc. Natl Acad. ScL USA (1994) 91(25):12091–12095.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NEUWALD AF, LIU JS, LIPMAN DJ, LAWRENCE CE: Extract-ing protein alignment models from the sequence data-base. Nucleic Acids Res. (1997) 25(9):1665–1677.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BIRNEY E, THOMPSON JD, GIBSON TJ: PairWise and SearchWise: finding the optimal alignment in a simul-taneous comparison of a protein profile against all DNA translation frames. Nucleic Acids Res. (1996) 24(14)2730–2739.
   Google Scholar
• FICKETT JW: Finding genes by computer: the state of the art. Trends Genetics (1996) 12(8):316–320.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• POST B: PHD: predicting one-dimensional protein structure by profile-based neural networks. Meth. En-zymol. (1996) 266:525–539.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DEVEREUX J, HAEBERLI P, SMITHIES 0: A comprehen-sive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nu-cleic Acids Res. (1984) 12(1, Pt 0:387–395.
   Google Scholar