Receptor antagonists targeting transmembrane domains

Bibliography

• WATSON S, ARKINSTALL S: The G-Protein Linked Receptor-Facts Book. Academic Press, London, UK (1994).
   Google Scholar
• PEBAY-PEYROULA E, RUMMEL G, ROSENBUSCH JP, LANDAU EM: X-ray structure of bacteriorhodopsin at 2.5 angstroms from microcrystals grown in lipidic cubic phases. Science (1997) 277:1676–1681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••The first high resolution x-ray structure of bacteriorodopsin.
   Google Scholar
• LUECKE H, SCHOBERT B, RICHTER HT, CARTAILLER JP,LANYI JK: Structure of bacteriorhodopsin at 1.55 A resolution. J. Mol. Biol. (1999) 291(4):899–911.
   Google Scholar
• ESSEN L, SIEGERT OR, LEHMANN WD, OESTERHELT D:Lipid patches in membrane protein oligomers: crystal structure of the bacteriorhodopsin-lipid complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1998) 95: 11673–11678.
   Google Scholar
• DEISENHOFER J, EPP O, SINNING I, MICHEL H: Crystallo-graphic refinement at 2.3 A resolution and refined model of the photosynthetic reaction centre from Rhodopseudomonas viridis. J. Mol. Biol. (1995) 246:429–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YOSHIKAWA S, SHINZAWA-ITOH K, NAKASHIMA R, et al.:Redox-coupled crystal structural changes in bovine heart cytochrome c oxidase. Science (1998) 280:1723–1729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XIA D, YU CA, KIM H, et al.: Crystal structure of thecytochrome bc1 complex from bovine heart mitochondria. Science (1997) 277:60–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DOYLE DA, MORAIS CABRAL J, PFUETZNER RA, et al.: Thestructure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of ICE conduction and selectivity. Science (1998) 280: 69–77.
   Google Scholar
• LEMMON MA, FLANAGAN JM, TREUTLEIN HR, ZHANG J, ENGELMAN DM: Sequence specificity in the dimeriza-Hon of transmembrane alpha-helices. Biochemistry (1992) 31:12719–12725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •The first report on specificity of intramembrane interaction between a-helices.
   Google Scholar
• MACKENZIE KR, PRESTEGARD JH, ENGELMAN DM: A transmembrane helix dimer: structure and implica-tions. Science (1997) 276:131–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ••Solution NMR structure of the dimeric TM domain ofglycophorin that suggested that van der Waals interactions alone can provide specific and stable association between TM helices.
   Google Scholar
• BALDWIN JM, SCHERTLER GF, UNGER VM: An alpha-carbon template for the transmembrane helices in the rhodopsin family of G-protein-coupled receptors. J. Mol. Biol. (1997) 272:144–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEITSCH MC, HERZYK P, WELL TN, HUBBARD RE: Automated modelling of the transmembrane region of G-protein coupled receptor by Swiss-model. Rec. Channels (1996) 4:161–164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KOBILKA BK, KOBILKA TS, DANIEL K, et al.: Chimeric alpha 2-, beta2-adrenergic receptors: delineation of domains involved in effector coupling and ligand binding specificity. Science (1988) 240:1310–1316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHONENBERG T, LIU J, WESS J: Plasma membrane localization and functional rescue of truncated forms of a G protein-coupled receptor. J. Biol. Chem. (1995) 270: 18000–18006.
   Google Scholar
• JAKUBIK J, WESS J: Use of a sandwich enzyme-linkedirnmunosorbent assay strategy to study mechanisms of G protein-coupled receptor assembly. J. Biol. Chem. (1999) 274:1349–1358.
   Google Scholar
• RIDGE KD, LEE SS, YAO LL: In vivo assembly of rhodopsin from expressed polypeptide fragments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1995) 91: 3204–3208.
   Google Scholar
• HUANG KS, BAYLEY H, LIAO MJ, LONDON E, KHORANA HG: Refolding of an integral membrane protein. Denaturation, renaturation and reconstitution of intact bacteriorhodopsin and two proteolytic fragments. J. Biol. Chem. (1981) 256:3802–3809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KAHN TW, ENGELMAN DM: Bacteriorhodopsin can be refolded from two independently stable transmem-brane helices and the complementary five-helix fragment. Biochemistry (1992) 31: 6144–6151.
   Google Scholar
• SCHONENBERG T, YUN J, WENKERT D, WESS J: Functional rescue of mutant V2 vasopressin receptors causing nephrogenic diabetes insipidus by a co-expressed receptor polypeptide. EMBO J. (1996) 15: 1283–1291.
   Google Scholar
• ••A biochemical demonstration of specificity of intramem-brane interactions for GPCRs.
   Google Scholar
• OSUGA Y, HAYASHI M, KUDO M, et al.: Co-expression of defective luteinizing hormone receptor fragments partially reconstitutes ligand-induced signal genera-tion. J. Biol. Chem. (1997) 272:25006–25012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEBERT TE, MOFFETT S, MORELLO JP, et al.: A peptide derived from a beta2-adrenergic receptor transmem-brane domain inhibits both receptor dimerization and activation. J. Biol. Chem. (1996) 271: 16384–16392.
   Google Scholar
• ••First report on inhibition of a GPCR function with a TMdomain analogue.
   Google Scholar
• GEORGE SR, LEE SP, VARGHESE G, et al.: A transmem-brane domain-derived peptide inhibits Di dopamine receptor function without affecting receptor oligomerization. J. Biol. Chem. (1998) 273:30244–30248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TARASOVA NI, RICE WG, MICHEJDA CJ: Inhibition ofG-protein coupled receptor function by disruption of transmembrane domain interactions. J. Biol. Chem. (1999) 274:34911–34915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HUNT JF, RATH P, ROTHSCHILD KJ, ENGELMAN DM: Spontaneous, pH-dependent membrane insertion of a transbilayer alpha-helix. Biochemistry (1997) 36(49):15177–15179.
   Google Scholar
• ••First report on the ability of synthetic analogues of TMdomains to undergo spontaneous insertion into bilayer.
   Google Scholar
• BAYLE D, WEEKS D, SACHS G: Identification of membrane insertion sequences of the rabbit gastric cholecystokinin-A receptor by in vitro translation. J. Biol. Chem. (1997) 272:19697–19707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •The paper demonstrates that different TM domains of a GPCR have significantly different abilities to insert into a membrane.
   Google Scholar
• VON HEIJNE G: Membrane protein structure predic-tion. Hydrophobicity analysis and the positive-inside rule. J. Mol. Biol. (1992) 225(2):487–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HARTMANN E, RAPOPORT TA, LODISN HF: Predictingthe orientation of eukaryotic membrane-spanning proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1989) 86:5786–5790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WALLIN E, VON HEIJNE G: Genome-wide analysis of integral membrane proteins from eubacterial, archaean and eukaryotic organisms. Protein. Sci. (1998) 7(4):1029–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SATO M, HRESKO R, MUECKLER M: Testing the chargedifference hypothesis for the assembly of a eucaryotic muhispanning membrane protein./ Biol. Chem. (1998) 273:25203–25208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WU Y, HUANG HW, OLAH GA: Method of oriented circular dichroism Biophys. J. (1990) 57:797–806.
   Google Scholar
• ROST B, CASADIO R, FARISELLI P, et al.: Transmembranehelices predicted at 95% accuracy. Protein Sci. (1995) 4(3):521–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LE T, TSENG TT, SAIER MH, JR.: Flexible programs forthe prediction of average amphipathicity of multiply aligned homologous proteins: application to integral membrane transport proteins. Mol. Membr. Biol. (1999) 16(2):173–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ROST B, FARISELLI P, CASADIO R: Topology predictionfor helical transmembrane proteins at 86% accuracy. Protein Sci. (1996) 5(8):1704–1718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GROMIHA MM: A simple method for predicting transmembrane alpha helices with better accuracy. Protein Eng. (1999) 12(7):557–561.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PILPEL Y, BEN-TAL N, LANCET D kPROT: a knowledge- based scale for the propensity of residue orientation in transmembrane segments. Application to membrane protein structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. (1999) 294(4):921–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PASQUIER C, PROMPONAS VJ, PALAIOS GA, HAMODRAKAS JS, HAMODRAKAS SJ: A novel method for predicting transmembrane segments in proteins based on a statistical analysis of the SwissProt database: the PRED-TMR algorithm. Protein Eng. (1999) 12(5):381–385.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MORGENSTERN B, WERNER T, DRESS AWM: Multiple DNA and protein sequence alignment based on segment-to-segment comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1996) 93: 12098–12103.
   Google Scholar
• KIEBER-EMMONS T, MURALI R, GREENE MI: Therapeuticpeptides and peptidomimetics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. (1997) 8:435–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HARTS PI: Synthetic peptide fragments as probes forstructure determination of potassium ion-channel proteins. Biosci. Rep. (1998) 18:299–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar