Mucoadhesion: a review of characterization techniques

Bibliography

• Davidovich-Pinhas M, Harari O, Bianco-Peled H. Evaluating the mucoadhesive properties of drug delivery systems based on hydrated thiolated alginate. J Control Release 2009;136(1):38-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JW, Park JH, Robinson JR. Bioadhesive-based dosage forms: the next generation. J Pharm Sci 2000;89(7):850-66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strous GJ, Dekker J. Mucin-type glycoproteins. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 1992;27(1-2):57-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor C, Draget KI, Pearson JP, Smidsrod O. Mucous systems show a novel mechanical response to applied deformation. Biomacromolecules 2005;6(3):1524-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen F, Eberth K, Smart JD. A rheological assessment of the nature of interactions between mucoadhesive polymers and a homogenized mucus gel. Biomaterials 1998;19(11-12):1083-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roldo M, Hornof M, Caliceti P, Bernkop-Schnurch A. Mucoadhesive thiolated chitosans as platforms for oral controlled drug delivery: synthesis and in vitro evaluation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2004;57(1):115-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner VM, Walker GF, Bernkop-Schnurch A. Thiolated polymers: evidence for the formation of disulfide bonds with mucus glycoproteins. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2003;56(2):207-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernkop-Schnuerch A. Thiomers: a new generation of mucoadhesive polymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005;57(11):1569-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kast CE, Bernkop-Schnurch A. Thiolated polymers–thiomers: development and in vitro evaluation of chitosan-thioglycolic acid conjugates. Biomaterials 2001;22(17):2345-52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernkop-Schnurch A, Hornof M, Zoidl T. Thiolated polymers-thiomers: synthesis and in vitro evaluation of chitosan-2-iminothiolane conjugates. Int J Pharm 2003;260(2):229-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernkop-Schnurch A, Scholler S, Biebel RG. Development of controlled drug release systems based on thiolated polymers. J Control Release 2000;66(1):39-48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packham DE. Adhesion. In: DE Packham, editor, Handbook of adhesion: Longman Scientific & Technical; Harlow, Essex, England. 1992. p. 18-26
   Google Scholar
• Comyn J. Adhesion science: The Royal Society of Chemistry: London; 1997
   Google Scholar
• Nardin JSM. Theories and mechanisms of adhesion. In: Mittal KL, Pizzi A, editors, Handbook of adhesive technology: New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Pocius AV. Adhesion and adhesives technology–An introduction: Hanser-Gardner; Munich. 1997
   Google Scholar
• De Vries ME, Bodde HE, Busscher HJ, Junginger HE. Hydrogels for buccal drug delivery: properties relevant for muco-adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res 1988;22(11):1023-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baloglu E, Ozyazici M, Hizarcioglu SY, Karavana HA. An in vitro investigation for vaginal bioadhesive formulations: bioadhesive properties and swelling states of polymer mixtures. Farmaco 2003;58(5):391-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mortazavi SA, Smart JD. An investigation of some factors influencing the in vitro assessment of mucoadhesion. Int J Pharm 1995;116(2):223-30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacques Y, Buri P. An investigation of the physical behavior of moisture-activated mucoadhesive hydrogels upon contact with biological and nonbiological substrates. Pharm Acta Helvetiae 1997;72(4):225-32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grabovac V, Guggi D, Bernkop-Schnuerch A. Comparison of the mucoadhesive properties of various polymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005;57(11):1713-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransen N, Bjoerk E, Edsman K. Changes in the mucoadhesion of powder formulations after drug application investigated with a simplified method. J Pharm Sci 2008;97(9):3855-64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehr CM, Bouwstra JA, Tukker JJ, Junginger HE. Intestinal transit of bioadhesive microspheres in an in situ loop in the rat–a comparative study with copolymers and blends based on poly(acrylic acid). J Control Release 1990;13(1):51-62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerstrom H, Edsman K. Limitations of the rheological mucoadhesion method: The effect of the choice of conditions and the rheological synergism parameter. Eur J Pharm Sci 2003;18(5):349-57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner VM, Walker GF, Bernkop-Schnurch A. Thiolated polymers: evidence for the formation of disulfide bonds with mucus glycoproteins. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2003;56(2):207-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• das Neves J, Amaral Maria H, Bahia Maria F. Performance of an in vitro mucoadhesion testing method for vaginal semisolids: influence of different testing conditions and instrumental parameters. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2008;69(2):622-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson SJ, Perkins AC. In vitro assessment of the mucoadhesion of cholestyramine to porcine and human gastric mucosa. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2001;52(2):121-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kockisch S, Rees GD, Young SA, Polymeric microspheres for drug delivery to the oral cavity: An in vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive potential. J Pharm Sci 2003;92(8):1614-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromberg L, Temchenko M, Alakhov V, Hatton TA. Bioadhesive properties and rheology of polyether-modified poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels. Int J Pharm 2004;282(1-2):45-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venter JP, Kotze AF, Auzely-Velty R, Rinaudo M. Synthesis and evaluation of the mucoadhesivity of a CD-chitosan derivative. Int J Pharm 2006;313(1-2):36-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamburic S, Craig DQM. A comparison of different in vitro methods for measuring mucoadhesive performance. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 1997;44(2):159-67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munasur AP, Govender T, Mackraj I. Using an experimental design to identify and quantify the effects of environment related test parameters on the in vitro mucoadhesivity testing of a propanolol buccal tablet. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2007;33(7):709-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DS, Bruschi ML, de Freitas O, Rheological, mechanical and mucoadhesive properties of thermoresponsive, bioadhesive binary mixtures composed of poloxamer 407 and carbopol 974P designed as platforms for implantable drug delivery systems for use in the oral cavity. Int J Pharm 2009;372(1-2):49-58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi S, Ferrari F, Bonferoni MC, Caramella C. Characterization of chitosan hydrochloride-mucin rheological interaction: influence of polymer concentration and polymer:mucin weight ratio. Eur J Pharm Sci 2001;12(4):479-85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramella C, Bonferoni MC, Rossi S, Ferrari F. Rheological and tensile tests for the assessment of polymer-mucin interactions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 1994;40(4):213-17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco-Fuente H, Esteban-Fernandez B, Blanco-Mendez J, Otero-Espinar F-J. Use of beta -cyclodextrins to prevent modifications of the properties of carbopol hydrogels due to carbopol-drug interactions. Chem Pharm Bull 2002;50(1):40-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortazavi SA, Smart JD. An investigation into the role of water movement and mucus gel dehydration in mucoadhesion. J Control Release 1993;25(3):197-203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafedjiiski K, Krauland AH, Hoffer MH, Bernkop-Schnurch A. Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of a novel thiolated chitosan. Biomaterials 2004;26(7):819-26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernkop-Schnurch A, Kast CE, Richter MF. Improvement in the mucoadhesive properties of alginate by the covalent attachment of cysteine. J Control Release 2001;71(3):277-85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafedjiiski K, Hoffer M, Werle M, Bernkop-Schnuerch A. Improved synthesis and in vitro characterization of chitosan-thioethylamidine conjugate. Biomaterials 2005;27(1):127-35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsarra IA, Hamed AY, Mahrous GM, Mucoadhesive polymeric hydrogels for nasal delivery of acyclovir. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2009;35(3):352-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakoulides EP, Smart JD, Tsibouklis J. Azocrosslinked poly(acrylic acid) for colonic delivery and adhesion specificity: in vitro degradation and preliminary ex vivo bioadhesion studies. J Control Release 1998;54(1):95-109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen LS, Schubert L, Hansen J. Bioadhesive drug delivery systems. I. Characterization of mucoadhesive properties of systems based on glyceryl monooleate and glyceryl monolinoleate. Eur J Pharm Sci 1998;6(3):231-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Averineni RK, Sunderajan SG, Mutalik S, Development of mucoadhesive buccal films for the treatment of oral sub-mucous fibrosis: a preliminary study. Pharm Dev Technol 2009;14(2):199-207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito P, Colombo I, Lovrecich M. Investigation of surface properties of some polymers by a thermodynamic and mechanical approach: possibility of predicting mucoadhesion and biocompatibility. Biomaterials 1994;15(3):177-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerstrom H, Edsman K. Interpretation of mucoadhesive properties of polymer gel preparations using a tensile strength method. J Pharm Pharmacol 2001;53(12):1589-99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chickering DE, Mathiowitz E. Bioadhesive microspheres: I. A novel electrobalance-based method to study adhesive interactions between individual microspheres and intestinal mucosa. J Control Release 1995;34(3):251-62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chickering DE III, Harris WP, Mathiowitz E. A microtensiometer for the analysis of bioadhesive microspheres. Biomed Instrum Technol 1995;29(6):501-12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chickering DE III, Jacob JS, Mathiowitz E. Bioadhesive microspheres. II. Characterization and evaluation of bioadhesion involving hard, bioerodible polymers and soft tissue. React Polym 1995;25(2/3):189-206
   Google Scholar
• Chickering D, Jacob J, Mathiowitz E. Poly(fumaric-co-sebacic) microspheres as oral drug delivery systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 1996;52(1):96-101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos CA, Jacob JS, Hertzog BA, Correlation of two bioadhesion assays: the everted sac technique and the CAHN microbalance. J Control Release 1999;61(1-2):113-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernkop-Schnurch A, Steininger S. Synthesis and characterization of mucoadhesive thiolated polymers. Int J Pharm 2000;194(2):239-47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafedjiiski K, Jetti RKR, Foeger F, Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of thiolated hyaluronic acid for mucoadhesive drug delivery. Int J Pharm 2007;343(1-2):48-58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafedjiiski K, Foeger F, Werle M, Bernkop-Schnuerch A. Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of a novel chitosan-glutathione conjugate. Pharm Res 2005;22(9):1480-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernkop-Schnurch A, Konig V, Leitner VM, Preparation and characterization of thiolated poly(methacrylic acid)-starch compositions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2004;57(2):219-24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner VM, Marschutz MK, Bernkop-Schnurch A. Mucoadhesive and cohesive properties of poly(acrylic acid)-cysteine conjugates with regard to their molecular mass. Eur J Pharm Sci 2003;18(1):89-96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langoth N, Kalbe J, Bernkop-Schnurch A. Development of buccal drug delivery systems based on a thiolated polymer. Int J Pharm 2003;252(1-2):141-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hombach J, Palmberger TF, Bernkop-Schnuerch A. Development and in vitro evaluation of a mucoadhesive vaginal delivery system for nystatin. J Pharm Sci 2009;98(2):555-64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belgamwar V, Shah V, Surana SJ. Formulation and evaluation of oral mucoadhesive multiparticulate system containing metoprolol tartrate: an in vitro–ex vivo characterization. Curr Drug Deliv 2009;6(1):113-21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagesaether E, Bye R, Sande SA. Ex vivo mucoadhesion of different zinc-pectinate hydrogel beads. Int J Pharm 2008;347(1-2):9-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perioli L, Ambrogi V, Angelici F, Development of mucoadhesive patches for buccal administration of ibuprofen. J Control Release 2004;2004:73-82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perioli L, Ambrogi V, Giovagnoli S, Mucoadhesive bilayered tablets for buccal sustained release of flurbiprofen. AAPS PharmSciTech 2007;8(3):E54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perioli L, Ambrogi V, Rubini D, Novel mucoadhesive buccal formulation containing metronidazole for the treatment of periodontal disease. J Control Release 2004;95:521-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel VM, Prajapati BG, Patel HV, Patel KM. Mucoadhesive bilayer tablets of propranolol hydrochloride. AAPS PharmSciTech 2007;8(3):77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao KVR, Buri P. A novel in situ method to test polymers and coated microparticles for bioadhesion. Int J Pharm 1989;52(3):265-70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelor HK, Banning D, Dettmar PW, An in vitro mucosal model for prediction of the bioadhesion of alginate solutions to the esophagus. Int J Pharm 2002;238(1-2):123-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Ray AM, Iooss P, Gouyette A, Development of a "continuous-flow adhesion cell" for the assessment of hydrogel adhesion. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1999;25(8):897-904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikos AG, Peppas NA. Bioadhesive analysis of controlled-release systems. IV. An experimental method for testing the adhesion of microparticles with mucus. J Control Release 1990;12(1):31-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shultz Michael PFJA, Callow Maureen E, Callow James A. A turbulent channel flow apparatus for the determination of the adhesion strength of microfouling organisms. Biofouling 2000;15(4):243-51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducker WA, Senden TJ, Pashley RM. Measurement of forces in liquids using a force microscope. Langmuir 1992;8(7):1831-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel D, Smith JR, Smith AW, An atomic force microscopy investigation of bioadhesive polymer adsorption onto human buccal cells. Int J Pharm 2000;200(2):271-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary J, Bromberg L, Magner E. Adhesion of polyether-modified poly(acrylic acid) to mucin. Langmuir 2004;20(22):9755-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducker WA, Senden TJ, Pashley RM. Direct measurement of colloidal forces using an atomic force microscope. Nature 1991;353(6341):239-41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit M, Gaub HE. Measuring Cell adhesion forces with the atomic force microscope at the molecular level. Cells Tissues Organs 2002;172:174-89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ch'ng HS, Park H, Kelly P, Robinson JR. Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral controlled drug delivery II: synthesis and evaluation of some swelling, water-insoluble bioadhesive polymers. J Pharm Sci 1985;74(4):399-405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah VH, Belgamwar VS, Surana SJ. Formulation of oral mucoadhesive multiparticulate system by spray drying technique: an in vitro–ex vivo characterization. J Pharm Res 2008;7(3):178-82
   Google Scholar
• Harris D, Fell JT, Taylor DC, GI transit of potential bioadhesive systems in the rat. J Control Release 1990;12(1):55-65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht K, Greindl M, Kremser C, Comparative in vivo mucoadhesion studies of thiomer formulations using magnetic resonance imaging and fluorescence detection. J Control Release 2006;115(1):78-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckaert S, Lefebvre RA, Remon JP. In vitro/in vivo correlation of the bioadhesive properties of a buccal bioadhesive miconazole slow-release tablet. Pharm Res 1993;10(6):853-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilurzo F, Selmin F, Minghetti P, Montanari L. The effects of bivalent inorganic salts on the mucoadhesive performance of a polymethylmethacrylate sodium salt. Int J Pharm 2005;301(1-2):62-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottenberg P, Cleymaet R, De Muynck C, Development and testing of bioadhesive, fluoride-containing slow-release tablets for oral use. J Pharm Pharmacol 1991;43(7):457-64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris D, Fell JT, Sharma HL, Taylor DC. GI transit of potential bioadhesive formulations in man: a scintigraphic study. J Control Release 1990;12(1):45-53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosla R, Davis SS. The effect of polycarbophil on the gastric emptying of pellets. J Pharm Pharmacol 1987;39(1):47-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh GM, Ross-Murphy SB. Rheological characterization of polymer gels. Prog Poly Sci 1998;23(3):533-62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan EE, Gallo JM. A simple rheological method for the in vitro assessment of mucin-polymer bioadhesive bond strength. Pharm Res 1990;7(5):491-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picout DR, Ross-Murphy SB. Rheology of biopolymer solutions and gels. ScientificWorld 2003;3(3):105-21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Madsen F, Eberth K, Smart JD. A rheological examination of the mucoadhesive/mucus interaction: the effect of mucoadhesive type and concentration. J Control Release 1998;50(1-3):167-78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi S, Bonferoni MC, Lippoli G, Influence of mucin type on polymer-mucin rheological interactions. Biomaterials 1995;16(14):1073-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriamornsak P, Wattanakorn N. Rheological synergy in aqueous mixtures of pectin and mucin. Carbohydr Polym 2008;74(3):474-81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceulemans J, Vermeire A, Adriaens E, Evaluation of a mucoadhesive tablet for ocular use. J Control Release 2001;77(3):333-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen F, Eberth K, Smart JD. A rheological evaluation of various mucus gels for use in in-vitro mucoadhesion testing. Pharm Sci 1996;2(12):563-6
   Google Scholar
• Hagerstrom H, Paulsson M, Edsman K. Evaluation of mucoadhesion for two polyelectrolyte gels in simulated physiological conditions using a rheological method. Eur J Pharm Sci 2000;9(3):301-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saiano F, Pitarresi G, Cavallaro G, Evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of alpha,beta-poly(N-hydroxyethyl)-dl-aspartamide and alpha,beta-poly(aspartylhydrazide) using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Polymer 2002;43(23):6281-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriamornsak P, Wattanakorn N, Nunthanid J, Puttipipatkhachorn S. Mucoadhesion of pectin as evidence by wettability and chain interpenetration. Carbohydr Polym 2008;74(3):458-67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbari E, Wisniewski N, Pappas NA. Evidence of mucoadhesion by chain interpenetration at a poly(acrylic acid)/mucin interface using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. J Control Release 1993;26(2):99-108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang J, Li X. Novel mucoadhesive polymer: synthesis and mucoadhesion of poly[acrylic acid-co-poly(ethylene glycol) monomethylether monomethacrylate- co-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate]. J Appl Polym Sci 2004;94(6):2431-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel MM, Smart JD, Nevell TG, Mucin/Poly(acrylic acid) Interactions: a spectroscopic investigation of mucoadhesion. Biomacromolecules 2003;4(5):1184-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortazavi SA. An in vitro assessment of mucus/mucoadhesive interactions. Int J Pharm 1995;124(2):173-82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerstrom H, Edsman K, Stromme M. Low-frequency dielectric spectroscopy as a tool for studying the compatibility between pharmaceutical gels and mucous tissue. J Pharm Sci 2003;92(9):1869-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromme M. Physics of drug delivery: dielectric spectroscopy to probe mucoadhesion. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 2003;5118:310-22
   Google Scholar
• Hagerstrom H, Stromme M, Edsman K. Drug molecules as probes for studying the compatibility between gels and mucous tissue with dielectric spectroscopy. J Pharm Sci 2005;94(5):1090-100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos CA, Freedman BD, Ghosn S, Evaluation of anhydride oligomers within polymer microsphere blends and their impact on bioadhesion and drug delivery in vitro. Biomaterials 2003;24(20):3571-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rillosi M, Buckton G. Modeling mucoadhesion by use of surface energy terms obtained by the Lewis acid-Lewis base approach. Int J Pharm 1995;117(1):75-84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehr CM, Bouwstra JA, Bodde HE, Junginger HE. A surface energy analysis of mucoadhesion: contact angle measurements on Polycarbophil and pig intestinal mucosa in physiologically relevant fluids. Pharm Res 1992;9(1):70-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Bhatt PP, Johnston TP. Evaluation of a mucoadhesive buccal patch for delivery of peptides: in vitro screening of bioadhesion. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1998;24(10):919-26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen J, Wang Y, Ping Q, Mucoadhesive effect of thiolated PEG stearate and its modified NLC for ocular drug delivery. J Control Release 2009;137(3):217-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi H, Thongborisute J, Matsui Y, Novel mucoadhesion tests for polymers and polymer-coated particles to design optimal mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005;57(11):1583-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel HG. Drug discovery and evaluation: pharmacological asaays. 3rd edition. Berlin, New York: Springer, Inc.; 2007
   Google Scholar