236
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Photosensitizer-assembled PEGylated graphene-copper sulfide nanohybrids as a synergistic near-infrared phototherapeutic agent

, , , , , & show all

Bibliography

  • Papers of special note have been highlighted as either of interest (•) or of considerable interest (••) to readers.
  • Celli JP, Spring BQ, Rizvi I, et al. Imaging and photodynamic therapy: mechanisms, monitoring, and optimization. Chem Rev. 2010;110:2795–2838.
  • Palumbo G. Photodynamic therapy and cancer: a brief sightseeing tour. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2007;4:131–138.
  • van der Zee J. Heating the patient: a promising approach? Ann Oncol. 2002;13:1173–1184.
  • Robertson CA, Evans DH, Abrahamse H. Photodynamic therapy (PDT): a short review on cellular mechanisms and cancer research applications for PDT. J Photochem Photobio B. 2009;96:1–8.
  • Freitas I, Baronzio GF. Tumor hypoxia, reoxygenation and oxygenation strategies: possible role in photodynamic therapy. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1991;11:3–30.
  • Busch TM. Local physiological changes during photodynamic therapy. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38:494–499.
  • Fang J, Chen YC. Nanomaterials for photohyperthermia: a review. Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19:6622–6634.
  • Kuo WS, Chang CN, Chang YT, et al. Gold nanorods in photodynamic therapy, as hyperthermia agents, and in near-infrared optical imaging. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010;49:2711–2715.
  • Topete A, Alatorre-Meda M, Iglesias P, et al. Fluorescent drug-loaded, polymeric-based, branched gold nanoshells for localized multimodal therapy and imaging of tumoral cells. ACS Nano. 2014;8:2725–2738.
  • Singh R, Torti SV. Carbon nanotubes in hyperthermia therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65:2045–2060.
  • Qin Y, Chen J, Bi Y, et al. Near-infrared light remote-controlled intracellular anti-cancer drug delivery using thermo/pH sensitive nanovehicle. Acta Biomater. 2015;17:201–209.
  • Cheng L, Wang C, Feng L, et al. Functional nanomaterials for phototherapies of cancer. Chem Rev. 2014;114:10869–10939.

•• Comprehensive review on the application of various functional nanomaterials in photothermal therapy, photodynamic therapy and phototriggered combined therapy for cancer.

•• Review discussing the application of near-infrared light-responsive nanomaterials for spatially and temporally controlled noninvasive cancer treatment.

  • Zhang M, Murakami T, Ajima K, et al. Fabrication of ZnPc/protein nanohorns for double photodynamic and hyperthermic cancer phototherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:14773–14778.
  • Bhaumik J, Mittal AK, Banerjee A, et al. Applications of phototheranostic nanoagents in photodynamic therapy. Nano Res. 2015;8:1373–1394.
  • Jang B, Park JY, Tung CH, et al. Gold nanorod-photosensitizer complex for near-infrared fluorescence imaging and photodynamic/photothermal therapy in vivo. ACS Nano. 2011;5:1086–1094.
  • Wang S, Huang P, Nie L, et al. Single continuous wave laser induced photodynamic/plasmonic photothermal therapy using photosensitizer-functionalized gold nanostars. Adv Mater. 2013;25:3055–3061.

• An important study of single light-induced photothermal and photodynamic combination therapy.

•• Comprehensive summary on very recent studies of graphene-based nanomaterials for drug and gene delivery, as well as cancer combination therapy.

•• Progress for using graphene oxide for drug delivery.

  • Rong P, Yang K, Srivastan A, et al. Photosensitizer loaded nano-graphene for multimodality imaging guided tumor photodynamic therapy. Theranostics. 2014;4:229–239.
  • Wu CH, He QM, Zhu AN, et al. Synergistic anticancer activity of photo- and chemoresponsive nanoformulation based on polylysine-functionalized graphene. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6:21615–21623.
  • Yang K, Zhang S, Zhang G, et al. Graphene in mice: ultrahigh in vivo tumor uptake and efficient photothermal therapy. Nano Lett. 2010;10:3318–3323.

• The first report of in vivo efficient tumor passive targeting and in vivo ultraefficient photothermal therapy of PEGylated graphene sheets.

  • Markovic ZM, Harhaji-Trajkovic LM, Todorovic-Markovic BM, et al. In vitro comparison of the photothermal anticancer activity of graphene nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes. Biomaterials. 2011;32:1121–1129.
  • Akhavan O, Ghaderi E, Aghayee S, et al. The use of a glucose-reduced graphene oxide suspension for photothermal cancer therapy. J Mater Chem. 2012;22:13773–13781.
  • Shi X, Gong H, Li Y, et al. Graphene-based magnetic plasmonic nanocomposite for dual bioimaging and photothermal therapy. Biomaterials. 2013;34:4786–4793.
  • Akhavan O, Meidanchi A, Ghaderi E, et al. Zinc ferrite spinel-graphene in magnetophotothermal therapy of cancer. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2:3306–3314.
  • Dembereldorj U, Choi SY, Ganbold EO, et al. Gold nanorod-assembled PEGylated graphene-oxide nanocomposites for photothermal cancer therapy. Photochem Photobiol. 2014;90:659–6.
  • Wang Y, Wang H, Liu D, et al. Graphene oxide covalently grafted upconversion nanoparticles for combined NIR mediated imaging and photothermal/photodynamic cancer therapy. Biomaterials. 2013;34:7715–7724.
  • Wang Y, Wang K, Zhao J, et al. Multifunctional mesoporous silica-coated graphene nanosheet used for chemo-photothermal synergistic targeted therapy of glioma. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:4799–4804.
  • Kim H, Lee D, Kim J, et al. Photothermally triggered cytosolic drug delivery via endosome disruption using a functionalized reduced graphene oxide. ACS Nano. 2013;7:6735–6746.
  • Zhang W, Guo Z, Huang D, et al. Synergistic effect of chemo-photothermal therapy using PEGylated graphene oxide. Biomaterials. 2011;32:8555–8561.
  • Tian B, Wang C, Zhang S, et al. Photothermally enhanced photodynamic therapy delivered by nano-graphene oxide. ACS Nano. 2011;5:7000–7009.
  • Hu Z, Zhao F, Wang Y, et al. Facile fabrication of a C60-polydopamine-graphene nanohybrid for single light induced photothermal and photodynamic therapy. Chem Commun (Camb). 2014;50:10815–10818.
  • Sahu A, Choi WI, Lee JH, et al. Graphene oxide mediated delivery of methylene blue for combined photodynamic and photothermal therapy. Biomaterials. 2013;34:6239–6248.
  • Kim YK, Na HK, Kim S, et al. One-pot synthesis of multifunctional au@graphene oxide nanocolloid core@shell nanoparticles for Raman bioimaging, photothermal, and photodynamic therapy. Small. 2015;11:2527–2535.
  • Ma X, Tao H, Yang K, et al. A functionalized graphene oxide–iron oxide nanocomposite for magnetically targeted drug delivery, photothermal therapy, and magnetic resonance imaging. Nano Res. 2012;5:199–212.
  • Li Y, Lu W, Huang Q, et al. Copper sulfide nanoparticles for photothermal ablation of tumor cells. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2010;5:1161–1171.

•• The first report of in vitro photothermal ablation of cancer cells mediated by copper sulfide nanoparticles.

  • Zhou M, Zhang R, Huang M, et al. A chelator-free multifunctional [64Cu]CuS nanoparticle platform for simultaneous micro-PET/CT imaging and photothermal ablation therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:15351–15358.

• The first demonstration of functionalized copper sulfide nanoparticles for cancer theranostic applications.

  • Hessel CM, Pattani VP, Rasch M, et al. Copper selenide nanocrystals for photothermal therapy. Nano Lett. 2011;11:2560–2566.
  • Tian Q, Tang M, Sun Y, et al. Hydrophilic flower-like CuS superstructures as an efficient 980 nm laser-driven photothermal agent for ablation of cancer cells. Adv Mater. 2011;23:3542–3547.
  • Tian Q, Jiang F, Zou R, et al. Hydrophilic Cu9S5 nanocrystals: a photothermal agent with a 25.7% heat conversion efficiency for photothermal ablation of cancer cells in vivo. ACS Nano. 2011;5:9761–9771.
  • Guo L, Panderi I, Yan DD, et al. A comparative study of hollow copper sulfide nanoparticles and hollow gold nanospheres on degradability and toxicity. ACS Nano. 2013;7:8780–8793.

• Important to understand the toxicities of copper sulfide nanoparticle.

  • Shi F, Zheng W, Wang W, et al. Application of graphene-copper sulfide nanocomposite modified electrode for electrochemistry and electrocatalysis of hemoglobin. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;64:131–137.
  • Zha Z, Wang S, Zhang S, et al. Targeted delivery of CuS nanoparticles through ultrasound image-guided microbubble destruction for efficient photothermal therapy. Nanoscale. 2013;5:3216–3219.
  • Bai J, Liu Y, Jiang X. Multifunctional PEG-GO/CuS nanocomposites for near-infrared chemo-photothermal therapy. Biomaterials. 2014;35:5805–5813.
  • Guo L, Yan DD, Yang D, et al. Combinatorial photothermal and immuno cancer therapy using chitosan-coated hollow copper sulfide nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2014;8:5670–5681.

• Interesting application of copper sulfide nanoparticle for cancer photo- immunotherapy.

  • Marcano DC, Kosynkin DV, Berlin JM, et al. Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano. 2010;4:4806–4814.
  • Marsh M, McMahon HT. The structural era of endocytosis. Science. 1999;285:215–220.
  • Schmid SL, Carter LL. ATP is required for receptor-mediated endocytosis in intact cells. J Cell Biol. 1990;111:2307–2318.
  • Zhou F, Xing D, Wu B, et al. New insights of transmembranal mechanism and subcellular localization of noncovalently modified single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2010;10:1677–1681.
  • Pantarotto D, Briand JP, Prato M, et al. Translocation of bioactive peptides across cell membranes by carbon nanotubes. Chem Commun (Camb). 2004;1:16–17.
  • Akhavan O, Ghaderi E, Emamy H. Nontoxic concentrations of pegylated graphene nanoribbons for selective cancer cell imaging and photothermal therapy. J Mater Chem. 2012;22:20626–20633.
  • Hauck TS, Jennings TL, Yatsenko T, et al. Enhancing the toxicity of cancer chemotherapeutics with gold nanorod hyperthermia. Adv Mater. 2008;20:3832–3838.
  • Hahn GM, Braun J, Har-Kedar I. Thermochemotherapy: synergism between hyperthermia (42-43 degrees) and adriamycin (of bleomycin) in mammalian cell inactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1975;72:937–940.
  • Suchanek J, Henke P, Mosinger J, et al. Effect of temperature on photophysical properties of polymeric nanofiber materials with porphyrin photosensitizers. J Phys Chem B. 2014;118:6167–6174.
  • Akhavan O, Ghaderi E. Graphene nanomesh promises extremely efficient in vivo photothermal therapy. Small. 2013;9(21):3593–3601.
  • Castano AP, Demidova TN, Hamblin MR. Mechanisms in photodynamic therapy: part one: photosensitizers, photochemistry and cellular localization. Photodiagn Photodyn. 2004;1:279–293.
  • Robinson JT, Welsher K, Tabakman SM, et al. High performance in vivo near-IR (>1 mum) imaging and photothermal cancer therapy with carbon nanotubes. Nano Res. 2010;3:779–793.
  • Gollavelli G, Ling YC. Magnetic and fluorescent graphene for dual modal imaging and single light induced photothermal and photodynamic therapy of cancer cells. Biomaterials. 2014;35:4499–4507.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.