Computed tomography of the coronary arteries in diagnosis

Bibliography

• Cademartiri F, La Grutta L, Malago R, Prevalence of anatomical variants and coronary anomalies in 543 consecutive patients studied with 64-slice CT coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 2008;18(4):781-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leschka S, Koepfli P, Husmann L, Myocardial bridging: depiction rate and morphology at CT coronary angiography–comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Radiology 2008;246(3):754-62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulla J, Abildstrom SZ, Gotzsche O, 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2007;28(24):3042-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Lin C, Davidson R, Diagnostic value of 64-slice CT angiography in coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 2008;67(1):78-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janne d'Othee B, Siebert U, Cury R, A systematic review on diagnostic accuracy of CT-based detection of significant coronary artery disease. Eur J Radiol 2008;65(3):449-61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Jiang W. Diagnostic value of multislice computed tomography angiography in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2006;60(2):279-86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48(9):1896-910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer AB, O YL, Geleijns J, Kroft LJ. Meta-analysis of 40- and 64-MDCT angiography for assessing coronary artery stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191(6):1667-75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowatt G, Cook JA, Hillis GS, 64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 2008;94(11):1386-93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhoenacker PK, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Van Heste R, Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis. Radiology 2007;244(2):419-28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugeng L, Mor-Avi V, Weinert L, Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance reference. Circulation 2006;114(7):654-61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Trindade PT, Left ventricular and left atrial dimensions and volumes: comparison between dual-source CT and echocardiography. Invest Radiol 2008;43(5):284-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cury RC, Nieman K, Shapiro MD, Comprehensive assessment of myocardial perfusion defects, regional wall motion, and left ventricular function by using 64-section multidetector CT. Radiology 2008;248(2):466-75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axel L. Assessment of pericardial disease by magnetic resonance and computed tomography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19(6):816-26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Beek EJ, Stolpen AH, Khanna G, Thompson BH. CT and MRI of pericardial and cardiac neoplastic disease. Cancer Imaging 2007;7:19-26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oyama N, Komuro K, Nambu T, Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the pericardium: anatomy and pathology. Magn Reson Med Sci 2004;3(3):145-52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Labounty TM, Agarwal PP, Chughtai A, Evaluation of mechanical heart valve size and function With ECG-Gated 64-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193(5):W389-96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkadhi H, Desbiolles L, Husmann L, Aortic regurgitation: assessment with 64-section CT. Radiology 2007;245(1):111-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Plass A, Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography. Radiology 2006;240(1):47-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Bettex DA, Mitral regurgitation: quantification with 16-detector row CT–initial experience. Radiology 2006;238(2):454-63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuchtner GM, Stolzmann P, Dichtl W, Multislice computed tomography in infective endocarditis: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and intraoperative findings. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53(5):436-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuchtner GM, Muller S, Bonatti J, Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189(1):197-203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A, Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Radiology 2007;244(3):745-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lembcke A, Kivelitz DE, Borges AC, Quantification of aortic valve stenosis: head-to-head comparison of 64-slice spiral computed tomography with transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Invest Radiol 2009;44(1):7-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lembcke A, Woinke M, Borges AC, Grading of aortic valve stenosis at 64-slice spiral computed tomography: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography and calibration against cardiac catheterization. Invest Radiol 2009;44(6):360-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goo HW, Seo DM, Yun TJ, Coronary artery anomalies and clinically important anatomy in patients with congenital heart disease: multislice CT findings. Pediatr Radiol 2009;39(3):265-73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook SC, Raman SV. Multidetector computed tomography in the adolescent and young adult with congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2008;2(1):36-49
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leschka S, Oechslin E, Husmann L, Pre- and postoperative evaluation of congenital heart disease in children and adults with 64-section CT. Radiographics 2007;27(3):829-46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Alkadhi H. Recent developments in coronary computed tomography imaging. Imaging Med 2009;1(1):103-14
   Google Scholar
• Smith SC Jr, Dove JT, Jacobs AK, ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 2001;103(24):3019-41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peebles CR. Non-invasive coronary imaging: computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging? Heart 2003;89(6):591-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danias PG, Roussakis A, Ioannidis JP. Diagnostic performance of coronary magnetic resonance angiography as compared against conventional X-ray angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44(9):1867-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ, Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J 2006;151(2):404-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 2009;301(5):500-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation 2007;116(11):1290-305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae KT, Hong C, Whiting BR. Radiation dose in multidetector row computed tomography cardiac imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19(6):859-63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006;16(3):575-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005;112(15):2318-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocinaj D, Cioppa A, Ambrosini G, Radiation dose exposure during cardiac and peripheral arteries catheterisation. Int J Cardiol 2006;113(2):283-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog BA, Wyss CA, Husmann L, First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography. Heart 2009;95(20):1656-61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leschka S, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, Image quality and reconstruction intervals of dual-source CT coronary angiography: recommendations for ECG-pulsing windowing. Invest Radiol 2007;42(8):543-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 2006;113(10):1305-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T, Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 2008;18(3):592-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abada HT, Larchez C, Daoud B, MDCT of the coronary arteries: feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186(6 Suppl 2):S387-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT, Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2008;18(9):1809-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Radiation dose of cardiac dual-source CT: the effect of tailoring the protocol to patient-specific parameters. Eur J Radiol 2008;68(3):385-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ. Maximizing dose reductions with cardiac CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25(Suppl 2):279-287
   Google Scholar
• Einstein AJ, Wolff SD, Manheimer ED, Comparison of image quality and radiation dose of coronary computed tomographic angiography between conventional helical scanning and a strategy incorporating sequential scanning. Am J Cardiol 2009;104(10):1343-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopal A, Mao SS, Karlsberg D, Radiation reduction with prospective ECG-triggering acquisition using 64-multidetector Computed Tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25(4):405-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H, Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. Radiology 2008;249(1):71-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earls JP, Schrack EC. Prospectively gated low-dose CCTA: 24 months experience in more than 2,000 clinical cases. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:177-187
   Google Scholar
• Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Leschka S, Influence of calcifications on diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography using prospective ECG triggering. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191(6):1684-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart 2008;94(9):1132-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achenbach S, Marwan M, Schepis T, High-pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3(2):117-21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L, Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2896-2903
   Google Scholar
• Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D, Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J 2010;31(3):340-6
   Google Scholar
• Rogalla P, Kloeters C, Hein PA. CT technology overview: 64-slice and beyond. Radiol Clin North Am 2009;47(1):1-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero HJ, Steigner ML, Rybicki FJ. The ‘post-64’ era of coronary CT angiography: understanding new technology from physical principles. Radiol Clin North Am 2009;47(1):79-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML, Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;24(5):535-46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D, Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: the task force on the management of stable angina pectoris of the european society of cardiology. Eur Heart J 2006;27(11):1341-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006;114(16):1761-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48(7):1475-97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayyad AE, Cole J, Syed A, Temporal trends in utilization of cardiac computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3(1):16-21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohnesorge BM, Hofmann LK, Flohr TG, Schoepf UJ. CT for imaging coronary artery disease: defining the paradigm for its application. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2005;21(1):85-104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J 2008;29(6):766-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Busch S, Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Invest Radiol 2007;42(10):684-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuettner A, Trabold T, Schroeder S, Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: initial clinical results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44(6):1230-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A, Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2007;28(19):2354-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005;26(15):1482-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan-Hughes GJ, Marshall AJ, Roobottom CA. Multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography: experience in a UK centre. Clin Radiol 2003;58(5):378-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 2006;16(12):2739-47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weustink AC, Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Reliable high-speed coronary computed tomography in symptomatic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50(8):786-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong TK, Chin SP, Liew CK, Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: influence of calcification. Am Heart J 2006;151(6):1323 e1-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Husmann L, Schepis T, Scheffel H, Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with low, intermediate, and high cardiovascular risk. Acad Radiol 2008;15(4):452-61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49(1):62-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopal A, Nasir K, Ahmadi N, Cardiac computed tomographic angiography in an outpatient setting: an analysis of clinical outcomes over a 40-month period. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3(2):90-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaemperli O, Valenta I, Schepis T, Coronary 64-slice CT angiography predicts outcome in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 2008;18(6):1162-73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbiris D, Iskandrian AS, Segal BL, Bemis CE. Anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries. Circulation 1978;58(4):606-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake HA, Manion WC, Mattingly TW, Baroldi G. Coronary artery anomalies. Circulation 1964;30:927-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayalar N, Burkhart HM, Dearani JA, Congenital coronary anomalies and surgical treatment. Congenit Heart Dis 2009;4(4):239-51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maron BJ, Thompson PD, Puffer JC, Cardiovascular preparticipation screening of competitive athletes: addendum: an addendum to a statement for health professionals from the Sudden Death Committee (Council on Clinical Cardiology) and the Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee (Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young), American Heart Association. Circulation 1998;97(22):2294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar K, Sharma SK, Kini AS. Catheter selection for coronary angiography and intervention in anomalous right coronary arteries. J Interv Cardiol 2009;22(3):234-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt R, Froehner S, Brunn J, Congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries: imaging with contrast-enhanced, multidetector computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2005;15(6):1110-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge-Khatami A, Mavroudis C, Backer CL. Anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery: collective review of surgical therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74(3):946-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts WC, Siegel RJ, Zipes DP. Origin of the right coronary artery from the left sinus of valsalva and its functional consequences: analysis of 10 necropsy patients. Am J Cardiol 1982;49(4):863-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohlenkamp S, Hort W, Ge J, Erbel R. Update on myocardial bridging. Circulation 2002;106(20):2616-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer JR, Kitazume H, Proudfit WL, Sones FM Jr. Clinical significance of isolated coronary bridges: benign and frequent condition involving the left anterior descending artery. Am Heart J 1982;103(2):283-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furniss SS, Williams DO, McGregor CG. Systolic coronary occlusion due to myocardial bridging–a rare cause of ischaemia. Int J Cardiol 1990;26(1):116-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feld H, Guadanino V, Hollander G, Exercise-induced ventricular tachycardia in association with a myocardial bridge. Chest 1991;99(5):1295-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasan RS, Bahl VK, Rajani M. Myocardial infarction associated with a myocardial bridge. Int J Cardiol 1989;25(2):240-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble J, Bourassa MG, Petitclerc R, Dyrda I. Myocardial bridging and milking effect of the left anterior descending coronary artery: normal variant or obstruction? Am J Cardiol 1976;37(7):993-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi L, Dander B, Nidasio GP, Myocardial bridges and ischemic heart disease. Eur Heart J 1980;1(4):239-45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diefenbach C, Erbel R, Treese N, Häufigkeit von myokardbrücken nach adrenerger stimulation und nachlastsenkung bei patienten mit angina pectoris, aber unauffälligen koronararterien. Z Kardiol 1994;83(11):809-15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atar E, Kornowski R, Fuchs S, Prevalence of myocardial bridging detected with 64-slice multidetector coronary computed tomography angiography in asymptomatic adults. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2007;1(2):78-83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeina AR, Odeh M, Blinder J, Myocardial bridge: evaluation on MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(4):1069-73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack CV Jr, Braunwald E. 2007 update to the ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: implications for emergency department practice. Ann Emerg Med 2008;51(5):591-606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn MA, Kwan E, Gupta M, Tabas JA. Prevalence of acute myocardial infarction and other serious diagnoses in patients presenting to an urban emergency department with chest pain. J Emerg Med 2005;29(4):383-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee TH, Rouan GW, Weisberg MC, Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency room. Am J Cardiol 1987;60(4):219-24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med 2000;342(16):1163-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinnaiyan KM, Raff GL, Goldstein JA. Cardiac CT in the emergency department. Cardiol Clin 2009;27(4):587-96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazel P, Peterman MA, Schussler JM. Three-year outcomes and cost analysis in patients receiving 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography for chest pain. Am J Cardiol 2009;104(4):498-500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheorghiade M, Bonow RO. Chronic heart failure in the United States: a manifestation of coronary artery disease. Circulation 1998;97(3):282-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 2005;112(12):e154-235
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cleland JG, Pennell DJ, Ray SG, Myocardial viability as a determinant of the ejection fraction response to carvedilol in patients with heart failure (CHRISTMAS trial): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003;362(9377):14-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juergens KU, Fischbach R. Left ventricular function studied with MDCT. Eur Radiol 2006;16(2):342-57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan-Hughes GJ, Roobottom CA, Marshall AJ. Aortic valve imaging with computed tomography: a review. J Heart Valve Dis 2002;11(5):604-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrachliotis TG, Bis KG, Haidary A, Atypical chest pain: coronary, aortic, and pulmonary vasculature enhancement at biphasic single-injection 64-section CT angiography. Radiology 2007;243(2):368-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobell ARC, Jain AK. Catastrophic hemorrhage during redo sternotomy. Ann Thoracic Surgery 1984;37(4):273-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparovic H, Rybicki FJ, Millstine J, Three dimensional computed tomographic imaging in planning the surgical approach for redo cardiac surgery after coronary revascularization. Eur J Cardio Thorac 2005;28(2):244-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreeram N, Sutherland GR, Geuskens R, The role of transoesophageal echocardiography in adolescents and adults with congenital heart defects. Eur Heart J 1991;12(2):231-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haramati LB, Glickstein JS, Issenberg HJ, MR imaging and CT of vascular anomalies and connections in patients with congenital heart disease: significance in surgical planning. Radiographics 2002;22(2):337-47; discussion 48-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaemmerer H, Stern H, Fratz S, Imaging in adults with congenital cardiac disease (ACCD). Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;48(6):328-35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonaro S, Villines TC, Hausleiter J, International, multidisciplinary update of the 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3(4):224-32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maier W, Abay M, Cook S, The 2002 European registry of cardiac catheter interventions. Int J Cardiol 2006;113(3):299-304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffel H, Leschka S, Plass A, Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for the preoperative detection of coronary artery disease in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 2007;100(4):701-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng MM, Lu B, Hu SS, Optimizing CAD diagnosis in China with CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3(3):153-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ehara M, Terashima M, Kawai M, Impact of multislice computed tomography to estimate difficulty in wire crossing in percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion. J Invasive Cardiol 2009;21(11):575-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB, Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50(12):1161-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stillman AE, Oudkerk M, Ackerman M, Use of multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of acute chest pain: a consensus statement of the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology. Eur Radiol 2007;17(8):2196-207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar