CTA in the evaluation of acute chest pain syndromes. Should more widespread use be advocated?

Bibliography

• Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Bluemke DA, Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010;122:1756-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts SR, Niska RW, Xu J, Burt CW. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary. Natl Health Stat Rep 2008;7:1-38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tosteson AN, Goldman L, Udvarhelyi IS, Lee TH. Cost-effectiveness of a coronary care unit versus an intermediate care unit for emergency department patients with chest pain. Circulation 1996;94:143-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti A, Paladini B, Magazzini S, Chest pain unit management of patients at low and not low-risk for coronary artery disease in the emergency department. A 5-year experience in the Florence area. Eur J Emerg Med 2002;9:31-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shreibati J, Baker L, Hlatky M. Association of coronary CT angiography or stress testing with subsequent utilization and spending among medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 2011;306(19):2128-36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1163-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee TH, Goldman L. Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1187-95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman L, Cook EF, Johnson PA, Prediction of the need for intensive care in patients who come to the emergency departments with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1498-504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW, Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2508-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff M, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Min JK. Diagnostic Performance of 64-Multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1724-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Januzzi JL, Bamberg F, Lee H, Truong QA. High-sensitivity troponin t concentrations in acute chest pain patients evaluated with cardiac computed tomography. Circulation 2010;121:1227-34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, McB Hodgson J, ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography: a Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1864-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011 Dec;32(23):2999-3054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann U, Bamberg F, Claudia U, Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:1642-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann U, Nagurney TJ, Pena AJ, MDCT in Early triage of patients with acute chest pain: a prospective comparison to standard care. Circulation 2005;112(Suppl II):II-17
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:863-71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A, The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1414-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samad Z, Hakeem A, Mahmood SS, A meta-analysis and systematic review of computed tomography angiography as a diagnostic triage tool for patients with chest pain presenting to the emergency department. J Nucl Cardiol 2012; In press
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerber TC, Kuzo RS, Morin RL. Techniques and parameters for estimating radiation exposure and dose in cardiac computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2005;21(1):165-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnoldi E, Johnson TR, Rist C, Adequate image quality with reduced radiation dose in prospectively triggered coronary CTA compared with retrospective techniques. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2147-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA, Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 2008;246:742-53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology 2008;248:424-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruyama T, Takada M, Hasuike T, Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1450-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, Whole-chest 64-MDCT of emergency department patients with nonspecific chest pain: radiation dose and coronary artery image quality with prospective ECG triggering versus retrospective ECG gating. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:1662-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankstein R, Shah A, Pale R, Radiation dose and image quality of prospective triggering with dual-source cardiac computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2009;103:1168-73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efstathopoulos EP, Kelekis NL, Pantos I, Reduction of the estimated radiation dose and associated patient risk with prospectiveECG-gated 256-slice CT coronary angiography. Phys Med Biol 2009;54:5209-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein AJ, Wolff SD, Manheimer ED, Comparison of image quality and radiation dose of coronary computed tomographic angiography between conventional helical scanning and a strategy incorporating sequential scanning. Am J Cardiol 2009;104:1343-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Zhang Z, Fan Z, Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for dual source CT of the coronary stent: comparison of image quality, accuracy, and radiation dose. Eur J Radiol 2009; published online ahead of print September 22, 2009; doi:10.1016/ejrad.2009.09. 006
   Google Scholar
• Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T, Comparison of sequential and helical scanning for radiation dose and image quality: results of the prospective multicenter study on radiation dose estimates of cardiac ct angiography (PROTECTION) I Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1495-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFrance T, Dubois E, Gebow D, Helical prospective ECG-gating in cardiac computed tomography: radiation dose and image quality. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;26:99-107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storrow AB, Gibler WB. Chest pain centers: diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med 2000;35:449-61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takakuwa KM, Halpern EJ, Shofer FS. A time and imaging cost analysis of low-risk ED observation patients: a conservative 64-section computed tomography coronary angiography "triple rule-out" compared to nuclear stress test strategy. Am J Emerg Med 2011;29(2):187-95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar