Multiple myeloma – current status and future directions

Bibliography

• Kuehl WM, Bergsagel PL. Early genetic events provide the basis for a clinical classification of multiple myeloma. Hematology 2005;346-52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landgren O, Gridley G, Turesson I, et al. Risk of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and subsequent multiple myeloma among African American and white veterans in the United States. Blood 2006;107:904-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison CA, Batuman V, Behrens J, et al. The pathogenesis and diagnosis of acute kidney injury in multiple myeloma. Nature reviews. Nephrology 2012;8:43-51
   Google Scholar
• SEER Stat Fact Sheets: multiple Myeloma. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results; National Cancer Institutes. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/mulmy.html [Last accessed 11 July 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Kuehl WM, Bergsagel PL. Molecular pathogenesis of multiple myeloma and its premalignant precursor. J Clin Invest 2012;122:3456-63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorgun GT, Whitehill G, Anderson JL, et al. Tumor-promoting immune-suppressive myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the multiple myeloma microenvironment in humans. Blood 2013;121:2975-87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podar K, Zimmerhackl A, Fulciniti M, et al. The selective adhesion molecule inhibitor natalizumab decreases multiple myeloma cell growth in the bone marrow microenvironment: therapeutic implications. Br J Haematol 2011;155:438-48
   Google Scholar
• Chapman MA, Lawrence MS, Keats JJ, et al. Initial genome sequencing and analysis of multiple myeloma. Nature 2011;471:467-72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan JB, Shi CX, Tembe W, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of multiple myeloma from diagnosis to plasma cell leukemia reveals genomic initiating events, evolution, and clonal tides. Blood 2012;120:1060-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker BA, Wardell CP, Melchor L, et al. Intraclonal heterogeneity is a critical early event in the development of myeloma and precedes the development of clinical symptoms. Leukemia 2013; published online 2 July 2013; doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.199
   Google Scholar
• Keats JJ, Chesi M, Egan JB, et al. Clonal competition with alternating dominance in multiple myeloma. Blood 2012;120:1067-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccardi A, Gobbi PG, Ucci G, et al. Changing clinical presentation of multiple myeloma. Eur J Cancer 1991;27:1401-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimopoulos M, Terpos E, Comenzo RL, et al. International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple Myeloma. Leukemia 2009;23:1545-56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terpos E, Morgan G, Dimopoulos MA, et al. International Myeloma Working Group recommendations for the treatment of multiple myeloma-related bone disease. J Clin Oncol 2013;18:2347-57
   Google Scholar
• Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2009;23:3-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avet-Loiseau H, Hulin C, Campion L, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities are major prognostic factors in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: the intergroupe francophone du myelome experience. J Clin Oncol 2013;22:2806-9
   Google Scholar
• Xiong W, Wu X, Starnes S, et al. An analysis of the clinical and biologic significance of TP53 loss and the identification of potential novel transcriptional targets of TP53 in multiple myeloma. Blood 2008;112:4235-46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drach J, Ackermann J, Fritz E, et al. Presence of a p53 gene deletion in patients with multiple myeloma predicts for short survival after conventional-dose chemotherapy. Blood 1998;92:802-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avet-Loiseau H, Attal M, Moreau P, et al. Genetic abnormalities and survival in multiple myeloma: the experience of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome. Blood 2007;109:3489-95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy J, Jacobson J, Sawyer J, et al. Continuous absence of metaphase-defined cytogenetic abnormalities, especially of chromosome 13 and hypodiploidy, ensures long-term survival in multiple myeloma treated with Total Therapy I: interpretation in the context of global gene expression. Blood 2003;101:3849-56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, et al. Clinical implications of t(11;14)(q13;q32), t(4;14)(p16.3;q32), and -17p13 in myeloma patients treated with high-dose therapy. Blood 2005;106:2837-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez NC, Castellanos MV, Martin ML, et al. Prognostic and biological implications of genetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation: t(4;14) is the most relevant adverse prognostic factor, whereas RB deletion as a unique abnormality is not associated with adverse prognosis. Leukemia 2007;21:143-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca R, Bergsagel PL, Drach J, et al. International Myeloma Working Group molecular classification of multiple myeloma: spotlight review. Leukemia 2009;23:2210-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Barlogie B, Shaughnessy JD Jr. The molecular characterization and clinical management of multiple myeloma in the post-genome era. Leukemia 2009;23:1941-56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed V, Shah J, Medeiros LJ, et al. Solitary plasmacytomas: outcome and prognostic factors after definitive radiation therapy. Cancer 2011;117:4468-74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Francais du Myelome. N Engl J Med 1996;335:91-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, et al. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1875-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Bruno B, et al. Melphalan 200 mg/m(2) versus melphalan 100 mg/m(2) in newly diagnosed myeloma patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 3 study. Blood 2010;115:1873-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straka C, et al. The effects of induction chemotherapy and high-dose melphalan with tandem autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma: the prospective randomized DSMM 2 study. Blood 2007;110:abstract 446
   Google Scholar
• Attal M, Harousseau JL, Facon T, et al. Single versus double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2495-502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonneveld P, Schmidt-Wolf IG, van der Holt B, et al. Bortezomib induction and maintenance treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the randomized phase III HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:2946-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccadoro M, Cavallo F, Gay FM, et al. LMPR versus MEL200: Lenalidomide maintenance versus no maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Proc ASCO 2013;abstract 8509
   Google Scholar
• Rajkumar SV, Blood E, Vesole D, et al. Phase III clinical trial of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a clinical trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:431-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harousseau JL, Attal M, Avet-Loiseau H, et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is superior to vincristine plus doxorubicin plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the IFM 2005-01 phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:4621-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonder JA, Crowley J, Hussein MA, et al. Lenalidomide and high-dose dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone as initial therapy for multiple myeloma: a randomized Southwest Oncology Group trial. Blood 2010;116:5838-41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart AK, Richardson PG, San-Miguel JF. How I treat multiple myeloma in younger patients. Blood 2009;114:5436-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropff M, Liebisch P, Knop S, et al. DSMM XI study: dose definition for intravenous cyclophosphamide in combination with bortezomib/dexamethasone for remission induction in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Ann Hematol 2009;88:1125-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavo M, Tacchetti P, Patriarca F, et al. Bortezomib with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction therapy before, and consolidation therapy after, double autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet 2010;376:2075-85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garderet L, Iacobelli S, Moreau P, et al. Superiority of the triple combination of bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone over the dual combination of thalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma progressing or relapsing after autologous transplantation: the MMVAR/IFM 2005-04 Randomized Phase III Trial from the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:2475-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Flinn I, Richardson PG, et al. Randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study (EVOLUTION) of combinations of bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, and lenalidomide in previously untreated multiple myeloma. Blood 2012;119:4375-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma: 2012 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 2012;87:78-88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1046-60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayers PM, Palumbo A, Hulin C, et al. Thalidomide for previously untreated elderly patients with multiple myeloma: meta-analysis of 1685 individual patient data from 6 randomized clinical trials. Blood 2011;118:1239-47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, et al. Persistent overall survival benefit and no increased risk of second malignancies with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone versus melphalan-prednisone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:448-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Hajek R, Delforge M, et al. Continuous lenalidomide treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1759-69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajkumar SV, Jacobus S, Callander NS, et al. Lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone versus lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:29-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shustik C, Belch A, Robinson S, et al. A randomised comparison of melphalan with prednisone or dexamethasone as induction therapy and dexamethasone or observation as maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma: NCIC CTG MY.7. Br J Haematol 2007;136:203-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myeloma Trialists' Collaborative Group. Interferon as therapy for multiple myeloma: an individual patient data overview of 24 randomized trials and 4012 patients. Br J Haematol 2001;113:1020-34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosinol L, Oriol A, Terueal AI, et al. Maintenance therapy after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma with bortezomib/thalidomide vs. thalidomide Vs. alfa2b-Interferon: final results of a phase III Pethema/GEM randomized trial. ASH 2012;#334
   Google Scholar
• Nooka AK, Behera M, Boise LH, et al. Thalidomide As maintenance therapy in Multiple Myeloma (MM) Improves Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS): A meta-analysis. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2011;118:1855
   Google Scholar
• Hahn-Ast C, Lilienfeld-Toal M, Heteren P. Improved progression-free and overall survival with thalidomide maintenance therapy after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of five randomized trials. Haematologica 2011;96:Suppl 1:[ Abstract O884]
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig H, Durie BG, McCarthy P, et al. IMWG consensus on maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma. Blood 2012;119:3003-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan GJ, Gregory WM, Davies FE, et al. The role of maintenance thalidomide therapy in multiple myeloma: MRC Myeloma IX results and meta-analysis. Blood 2012;119:7-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Marit G, et al. Lenalidomide maintenance after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1782-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy PL, Owzar K, Hofmeister CC, et al. Lenalidomide after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1770-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellqvist UH, Gimsing P, Hjertner O, et al. Bortezomib consolidation after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: a Nordic Myeloma Study Group randomized phase 3 trial. Blood 2013;121:4647-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavo M, Pantani L, Petrucci MT, et al. Bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone is superior to thalidomide-dexamethasone as consolidation therapy after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood 2012;120:9-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Rossi D, et al. overall survival benefit for bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide followed by maintenance with bortezomib-thalidomide (VMPT-VT) versus bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. ASH 2012;#200
   Google Scholar
• Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Rossi D, et al. Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide followed by maintenance with bortezomib-thalidomide compared with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:5101-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensinger WI, Buckner CD, Anasetti C, et al. Allogeneic marrow transplantation for multiple myeloma: an analysis of risk factors and outcome. Blood 1996;88:2787-93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einsele H, Schafer HJ, Hebart H, et al. Follow-up of patients with progressive multiple myeloma undergoing allografts after reduced-intensity conditioning. Br J Haematol 2003;121:411-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno B, Rotta M, Patriarca F, et al. A comparison of allografting with autografting for newly diagnosed myeloma. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1110-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahrton G, Iacobelli S, Bjorkstrand B, et al. Autologous/reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation versus autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma: long-term results of the EBMT-NMAM2000 study. Blood 2013;121:5055-63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garban F, Attal M, Michallet M, et al. Prospective comparison of autologous stem cell transplantation followed by dose-reduced allograft (IFM99-03 trial) with tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (IFM99-04 trial) in high-risk de novo multiple myeloma. Blood 2006;107:3474-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan A, Pasquini MC, Logan B, et al. Autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation followed by allogeneic or autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma (BMT CTN 0102): a phase 3 biological assignment trial. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:1195-203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig H, Avet-Loiseau H, Blade J, et al. European perspective on multiple myeloma treatment strategies: update following recent congresses. Oncologist 2012;17:592-606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma: 2011 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 2011;86:57-65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohty B, El-Cheikh J, Yakoub-Agha I, et al. Treatment strategies in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a focus on drug sequencing and 'retreatment' approaches in the era of novel agents. Leukemia 2012;26:73-85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimopoulos MA, Petrucci MT, Foa R, et al. Analysis of second-line lenalidomide following initial relapse in the MM-015 Trial. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2012;120:944
   Google Scholar
• Dimopoulos MA, Lacy MQ, Moreau P, et al. Pomalidomide in combination with low-dose dexamethasone: demonstrates a significant progression free survival and overall survival advantage, in relapsed/refractory MM: A Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label study. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2012;120:LBA-6
   Google Scholar
• Richardson PG, Siegel D, Baz R, et al. Phase 1 study of pomalidomide MTD, safety, and efficacy in patients with refractory multiple myeloma who have received lenalidomide and bortezomib. Blood 2013;121:1961-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vij R, Siegel DS, Jagannath S, et al. An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study of single-agent carfilzomib in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma who have been previously treated with bortezomib. Br J Haematol 2012;158:739-48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billecke L, Penas EM, May AM, et al. Similar incidences of TP53 deletions in extramedullary organ infiltrations, soft tissue and osteolyses of patients with multiple myeloma. Anticancer Res 2012;32:2031-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blade J, de Larrea CF, Rosinol L. Extramedullary involvement in multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2012;97(11):1618-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varettoni M, Corso A, Pica G, et al. Incidence, presenting features and outcome of extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma: a longitudinal study on 1003 consecutive patients. Ann Oncol 2010;21:325-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Simon JA, Sureda A, Fernandez-Aviles F, et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation is associated with a high incidence of extramedullary relapses in multiple myeloma patients. Leukemia 2006;20:542-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usmani SZ, Heuck C, Mitchell A, et al. Extramedullary disease portends poor prognosis in multiple myeloma and is over-represented in high-risk disease even in the era of novel agents. Haematologica 2012;97:1761-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasche L, Bernard C, Topp MS, et al. Features of extramedullary myeloma relapse: high proliferation, minimal marrow involvement, adverse cytogenetics: a retrospective single-center study of 24 cases. Ann Hematol 2012;91:1031-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blade J, Fernandez de Larrea C, Rosinol L, et al. Soft-tissue plasmacytomas in multiple myeloma: incidence, mechanisms of extramedullary spread, and treatment approach. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:3805-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short KD, Rajkumar SV, Larson D, et al. Incidence of extramedullary disease in patients with multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapy, and the activity of pomalidomide on extramedullary myeloma. Leukemia 2011;25:906-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terpos E, Rezvani K, Basu S, et al. Plasmacytoma relapses in the absence of systemic progression post-high-dose therapy for multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol 2005;75:376-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damaj G, Mohty M, Vey N, et al. Features of extramedullary and extraosseous multiple myeloma: a report of 19 patients from a single center. Eur J Haematol 2004;73:402-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrulis M, Lehners N, Capper D, et al. Targeting the BRAF V600E Mutation in Multiple Myeloma. Cancer Discov 2013; published online 23 April 2013 Apr 23; doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merlini G, Palladini G. Differential diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2012;2012:595-603
   PubMedGoogle Scholar