New drugs for myelofibrosis

References

• Levine RL, Wadleigh M, Cools J, et al. Activating mutation in the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myeloid metaplasia with myelofibrosis. Cancer Cell. 2005;7(4):387–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klampfl T, Gisslinger H, Harutyunyan AS, et al. Somatic mutations of calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(25):2379–2390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nangalia J, Massie CE, Baxter EJ, et al. Somatic CALR mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms with nonmutated JAK2. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(25):2391–2405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Finke C, et al. Integration of mutations and karyotype towards a genetics-based prognostic scoring system (GPSS) for primary myelofibrosis. Blood. 2014;124(21):406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs GS, Rampal RK. Clinical and molecular genetic characterization of myelofibrosis. Curr Opin Hematol. 2015;22(2):177–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood. 2009;113(13):2895–2901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2010;115(9):1703–1708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, et al. DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(4):392–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannucchi AM, Guglielmelli P, Rotunno G, et al. Mutation-enhanced international prognostic scoring system (MIPSS) for primary myelofibrosis: an AGIMM & IWG-MRT project. Blood. 2014;124(21):405–05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumi E, Pietra D, Pascutto C, et al. Clinical effect of driver mutations of JAK2, CALR, or MPL in primary myelofibrosis. Blood. 2014;124(7):1062–1069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tefferi A, Lasho TL, Finke CM, et al. CALR vs JAK2 vs MPL-mutated or triple-negative myelofibrosis: clinical, cytogenetic and molecular comparisons. Leukemia. 2014 Jul;28(7):1472–1477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannucchi AM, Lasho TL, Guglielmelli P, et al. Mutations and prognosis in primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2013;27(9):1861–1869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, et al. CALR and ASXL1 mutations-based molecular prognostication in primary myelofibrosis: an international study of 570 patients. Leukemia. 2014;28(7):1494–1500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyer HL, Mesa RA. Therapy for myeloproliferative neoplasms: when, which agent, and how? Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2014;2014(1):277–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroger NM, Deeg JH, Olavarria E, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in primary myelofibrosis: a consensus process by an EBMT/ELN international working group. Leukemia. 2015;29(11):2126–2133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesa RA, Niblack J, Wadleigh M, et al. The burden of fatigue and quality of life in myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs): an international Internet-based survey of 1179 MPD patients. Cancer. 2007;109(1):68–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesa RA, Schwager S, Radia D, et al. The Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF): an evidence-based brief inventory to measure quality of life and symptomatic response to treatment in myelofibrosis. Leuk Res. 2009;33(9):1199–1203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuel RM, Dueck AC, Geyer HL, et al. Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) symptom assessment form total symptom score: prospective international assessment of an abbreviated symptom burden scoring system among patients with MPNs. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(33):4098–4103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana V, Dudkiewicz P, Ahn ER, et al. Danazol therapy combined with intermittent application of chemotherapy induces lasting remission in myeloproliferative disorder (MPD): an alternative for the elderly with advanced MPD. Hematology. 2011;16(2):90–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbour E, Thomas D, Kantarjian H, et al. Comparison of thalidomide and lenalidomide as therapy for myelofibrosis. Blood. 2011;118(4):899–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begna KH, Mesa RA, Pardanani A, et al. A phase-2 trial of low-dose pomalidomide in myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2011;25(2):301–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesa RA, Yao X, Cripe LD, et al. Lenalidomide and prednisone for myelofibrosis: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) phase 2 trial E4903. Blood. 2010;116(22):4436–4438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daver N, Cortes J, Newberry K, et al. Ruxolitinib in combination with lenalidomide as therapy for patients with myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2015;100(8):1058–1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begna KH, Pardanani A, Mesa R, et al. Long-term outcome of pomalidomide therapy in myelofibrosis. Am J Hematol. 2012;87(1):66–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervantes F, Alvarez-Larrán A, Hernández-Boluda JC, et al. Darbepoetin-alpha for the anaemia of myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Br J Haematol. 2006;134(2):184–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullin MF, Harrison CN, Niederwieser D, et al. The use of erythropoietic-stimulating agents (ESAs) with ruxolitinib in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (PPV-MF), and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (PET-MF). Blood. 2012;120(21):2838–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver RT, Vandris K, Goldman JJ. Recombinant interferon-α may retard progression of early primary myelofibrosis: a preliminary report. Blood. 2011;117(24):6669–6672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesa RA, Nagorney DS, Schwager S, et al. Palliative goals, patient selection, and perioperative platelet management: outcomes and lessons from 3 decades of splenectomy for myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia at the Mayo Clinic. Cancer. 2006;107(2):361–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):799–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison C, Kiladjian -J-J, Al-Ali HK, et al. JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):787–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagop K, Kiladjian -J-J, Gotlib J, et al. A pooled overall survival analysis of the COMFORT studies: 2 randomized phase 3 trials of ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Blood. 2013;122(21):2820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komrokji R, Wadleigh M, Seymour JF, et al. Results of a phase 2 study of pacritinib (SB1518), a novel oral JAK2 inhibitor, in patients with primary, post-polycythemia vera, and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Blood. 2011;118(21):Abstract 282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komrokji RS, Seymour JF, Roberts AW, et al. Results of a phase 2 study of pacritinib (SB1518), a JAK2/JAK2(V617F) inhibitor, in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2015;125(17):2649–2655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesa R, Egyed M, Sxoke A, et al. Results of the PERSIST-1 phase III study of pacritinib (PAC) versus best available therapy (BAT) in primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (PPV-MF), or post-essential thrombocythemia-myelofibrosis (PET-MF). J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(Suppl; Abstr LBA7006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannucchi AM, Mesa RA, Cervantes F, et al. Analysis of outcomes by patient subgroups in patients with myelofibrosis treated with pacritinib vs best available therapy (BAT) in the phase III persist-1 trial. Blood. 2015. ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition. Abstract 58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardanani A, Laborde RR, Lasho TL, et al. Safety and efficacy of CYT387, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2013;27(6):1322–1327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstovsek S, Talpaz M, Ricthie E, et al. A phase 1/2 Study of NS-018, an oral JAK2 inhibitor, in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (pPV MF), or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (pET MF). Blood. 2015. ASH Annual Meeting, Abstract 2800.
   Google Scholar
• Mascarenhas JO, Talpaz M, Gupta V, et al. Primary analysis results from an open-label phase II study of INCB039110, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2014;124(21):714–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer SC, Keller MD, Chiu S, et al. CHZ868, a type II JAK2 inhibitor, reverses type I JAK inhibitor persistence and demonstrates efficacy in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cancer Cell. 2015;28(1):15–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppikar P, Bhagwat N, Kilpivaara O, et al. Heterodimeric JAK-STAT activation as a mechanism of persistence to JAK2 inhibitor therapy. Nature. 2012 Sep 6;489(7414):155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heine A, Held SA, Daecke SN, et al. The JAK-inhibitor ruxolitinib impairs dendritic cell function in vitro and in vivo. Blood. 2013;122(7):1192–1202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vainchenker W, Constantinescu SN. JAK/STAT signaling in hematological malignancies. Oncogene. 2013 May 23;32(21):2601–2613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tefferi A. Telomerase inhibitor imetelstat in essential thrombocythemia and myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(26):2580–2581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tefferi A, Lasho TL, Begna KH, et al. A pilot study of the telomerase inhibitor imetelstat for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(10):908–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Foltz LM, et al. Phase 2 trial of PRM-151, an anti-fibrotic agent, in patients with myelofibrosis: stage 1 results. Blood. 2014;124(21):713.
   Google Scholar
• Guglielmelli P, Barosi G, Rambaldi A, et al. Safety and efficacy of everolimus, a mTOR inhibitor, as single agent in a phase 1/2 study in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2011;118(8):2069–2076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiskus W, Verstovsek S, Manshouri T, et al. Dual PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 synergistically enhances the activity of JAK2 inhibitor against cultured and primary human myeloproliferative neoplasm cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12(5):577–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine DA, Copland M. Targeting hedgehog in hematologic malignancy. Blood. 2012;119(10):2196–2204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinelli G, Oehler VG, Papayannidis C, et al. Treatment with PF-04449913, an oral smoothened antagonist, in patients with myeloid malignancies: a phase 1 safety and pharmacokinetics study. Lancet Haematol. 2015;2(8):e339–e346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki K, Gotlib JR, Mesa RA, et al. Phase II evaluation of IPI-926, an oral Hedgehog inhibitor, in patients with myelofibrosis. Leuk Lymphoma. 2015;56(7):2092–2097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller MD, Rampal RK, Shank K, et al. Improved efficacy of combination of JAK2 and hedgehog inhibitors in myelofibrosis. Blood. 2013;122(21):666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta V, Koschmieder S, Harrison CN, et al. Phase 1b dose-escalation study of sonidegib (LDE225) in combination with ruxolitinib (INC424) in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2014;124(21):712–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saci A, Pinzon-Ortiz M, Wang D, et al. The combination of JAK inhibitor, ruxolitinib, and PIM inhibitor, LGH447, in preclinical models of myeloproliferative neoplasia. Blood. 2013;122(21):4100–00.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagwat N, Koppikar P, Keller M, et al. Improved targeting of JAK2 leads to increased therapeutic efficacy in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2014;123(13):2075–2083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marubayashi S, Koppikar P, Taldone T, et al. HSP90 is a therapeutic target in JAK2-dependent myeloproliferative neoplasms in mice and humans. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(10):3578–3593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs G, Litvin R, Ahn J, et al. AUY922, a heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor, demonstrates activity in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Blood. 2015;126(23):4075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison CN, Kiladjian -J-J, Heidel FH, et al. Efficacy, safety, and confirmation of the recommended phase 2 starting dose of the combination of ruxolitinib (RUX) and panobinostat (PAN) in patients (Pts) with myelofibrosis (MF). Blood. 2015;126(23):4060–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeremy Wen Q, Yang Q, Goldenson B, et al. Targeting megakaryocytic-induced fibrosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms by AURKA inhibition. Nat Med. 2015;21(12):1473–1480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante JR, Dees EC, Olszanski AJ, et al. Phase I dose-escalation study of LCL161, an oral inhibitor of apoptosis proteins inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(28):3103–3110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raftopoulos H, Laadem A, Hesketh PJ, et al. Sotatercept (ACE-011) for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia in patients with metastatic breast cancer or advanced or metastatic solid tumors treated with platinum-based chemotherapeutic regimens: results from two phase 2 studies. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Apr;24(4):1517–1525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar