Critical Theory and the Two-Level Account of Recognition - Towards a New Foundation?

References

• Adorno, Theodor W & Max Horkheimer. 2000. Dialectic Of Enlightenment, John Cumming (trans.). New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, Theodor W 2001. Aesthetic Theory, Robert Hullot-Kentor (trans.). Minneapolis, MN: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Arendt, Hannah. 1966. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, C.J. 1986. Dialectics of Labour: Marx and his Relation to Hegel. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cahn, Michael. 1984. “Subversive Mimesis: Theodore W Adorno and the Modern Impasse of Critique”. In Mimesis in Contemporary Theory: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Mihai Spariosu (ed.), Vol. I. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamin's Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, Antonio. 1999. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Dews, Peter. “Modernity, Self-Consciousness and the Scope of Philosophy: Jurgen Habermas and Dieter Henrich in Debate.” In The Limits of Disenchantment, P. Dews (ed.), 170–93. London: Verso, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Diising, Klaus. 1997. Selbstbewußtseinsmodelle. Moderne Kritiken und systematische Entwúrfe zur konkreten Subjektivitiit, 41–57. M&#x00FCnchen: Wilhelm Fink
   Google Scholar
• Foster, Roger. 2007. Adorno: The Recovery of Experience. SUNY Series in Contemporary Continental Philosophy, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freuncilieb, Dieter. 2000.“Rethinking Critical Theory: Weaknesses and New Directions”. Constellations 7(1): 80–99. doi:10.1111/1467-8675.00171
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, Nigel C. & Andrew Rubin. 2002. Adorno. A Critical Reader. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Goldie, Peter. 2000. The Emotions. A Philosophical Exploration. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Postmetaphysi cal Thinking: Philosophical Essays, W. Hohengarten (trans.).
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Thomas McCarthy (trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Miriam Bratu. 1997.“Mass Culture as Hieroglyphic Writing: Adorno, Derricia, Kracauer”. In The Actuality of Adorno: Critical Essays on Adorno and the Postmodern, Max Pensky (ed.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, Peter. 2002. The Cradle of Thought. Exploring the Origins of Thinking. London: Pan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hohendahl, Peter Uwe & Jaimey Fisher. 2001. Critical Theory: Current State and Future Prospects. London: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, Axel. 2008. Reification. A New Look at an Old Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, Axel. 1995. The Struggle for Recognition. Cambridge, Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huhn, Tom. 2004.“Introduction: Thoughts beside Themselves”. In The Cambridge Companion to Adorno, T. Huhn (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CCOL 0521772893
   Google Scholar
• Jay, Martin. 2004.“Mimesis and Mimetology: Adorno and Lacoue-Labarthe”. In D. Rasmussen & J. Swindal (ecis), Critical Theory Vol. 4, 265–83. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, Michael (ed.) 1998.“Mimesis”. In The Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, Vol 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. 1990. Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte, Bd. 40. Berlin: MEW
   Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A.M. & M.K. Moore. 1989.“Imitation in Newborn Infants: Exploring the Range of Gestures Imitated and the Underlying Mechanisms”. Developmental Psychology 25: 954–62. cioi: 10). 1037/0012–1649. 25.6. 954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, Matthew. 2005.“The Feeling of Being”. Journal of Consciousness Studies vol. 12 no. 8/10: 43–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G. et al. 1996.“Premotor Cortex and the Recognition of Motor Actions”. Cognition and Brain Research 3: 131–41. cioi:10.1016/0926–6410(95)00038–0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1946. Refiexions sur la question juive. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Schulte, Günter. 1992. Kennen SW Marx? Kritik der proletari schen Vernunfi. Frankfurt am Main/ New York: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Seel, Martin. 2004.“ `Jede wirklich gesattifte Anschauung'. Das positive Zentrum der negative Philosophie Aciornos''. In Martin Seel, Adronos Phi losophie der Kontemplation, (ed.), 9–19. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Szerszynski, Bronislaw. 2003.“Technology, Performance and Life Itself: Hannah Arendt and the Fate of Nature”. Sociological Review, Volume 51(2): 203–18. cioi:10.1111/j.1467-954X. 2004.00459.x
   Google Scholar
• Wellmer, Albrecht. 1993.“Wahrheit, Schein, Versöhnung. Aciornos ästhetische Rettung der Mociemität”. In A. Wellmer (ed.), Zur Di alektik der Moderne und Postmoderne.14-rnunfikritik nach Adorno, 9–47. Frankfurt am Main: Surhkamp.
   Google Scholar