Bibliography
- Barker, S. F. and P. Achinstein. ‘On the new riddle of induction’. In The Philosophy of Science, edited by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968.
- Beebee, H. Hume on Causation. London: Routledge, 2006.
- Bhaskar, R. Plato, Etc.: The Problems of Philosophy and their Resolution. London: Verso, 1994.
- Bhaskar, R. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Hassocks: Harvester, 1989.
- Bhaskar, R. A Realist Theory of Science. Hassocks: Harvester, 1978.
- Chalmers, A. ‘Is Bhaskar’s realism realistic?’. Radical Philosophy 49 (1988): 18–23.
- Goodman, N. Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1973.
- Groff, R. Critical Realism, Post-Positivism, and the Possibility of Knowledge. London & New York: Routledge, 2004.
- Howson, C. Hume’s Problem: Induction and the Justification of Belief. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.
- Katz, J. The Problem ofInduction and Its Solution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
- Morgan, J. ‘An alternative argument for transcendental realism based on an immanent critique of Kant’. Journal of Critical Realism 4(2) (2005): 435–60. doi:10.1163/157251305774356649
- Norris, C. Quantum Theory and the Flightfrom Realism: Philosophical Responses to Quantum Mechanics. London & New York: Routledge, 2000.
- Potter, G. ‘Reopening the wound: against God and Bhaskar’. Journal of Critical Realism 5(1) (2006): 92–109. doi:10.1163/157251306776892858 Westphal, K. R. Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.