Species concepts and ecogeographical divergence of Oncocyclus irises

References

• Luckow, M. 1995. Species concepts: assumptions, methods, and applications. Syst. Bot. 20: 589-605.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, G., Chase, M.W., Goldblatt, P., Rudall, P., Fay, M.F., Cox, A.V., Lejeune, B., et al. 2001a. Molecular systematics of Iridaceae: evidence from four plastid DNA regions. Am. J. Bot. 88: 2074-2087.
   Google Scholar
• Mallet, J. 2001. Species, concepts of. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Academic Press, London, pp. 427-440.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2001. IUCN Red List Categories: Version 3.1. Prepared by the IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, M., Yeo, P., Lack, A. 1996. The natural history of pollination. Harper Collins, London.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, Y., Shmida, A., Ritte, U. 2001b. Population variation in the Oncocyclus Irises along a geographical gradient in Israel. International conference of Irises and Iridaceae: Biodiversity and Systematics, Rome, Italy. Ann. Bot. Nuova Serie 1(2): 135-144.
   Google Scholar
• Templeton, A.R. 1998. Nested clade analyses of phylo-geographic data: testing hypotheses about gene flow and population history. Mol. Ecol. 7: 381-397.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard Smith, J. 1998. Evolutionry genetics. Oxford University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, G.A., Antos, J.A., Worley, A.C., Suttill, T.A., Hebda, R.J. 1996. Morphological and genetic variation in disjunct populations of the avalanche lily Erythronium montanum. Can. J. Bot. 74: 403-412.
   Google Scholar
• Faegry, K., van der Pijl, L. 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Feinbrun-Dothan, N. 1986, Flora Palaestina. Vol. 4. Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S.D., Steiner, K.E. 2000. Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. Trends Evol. Ecol. 15: 140-143.
   Google Scholar
• Keasar, T., Bilu, Y., Motro, U., Shmida, A. 1997. Foraging choices of bumblebees on equally rewarding artificial flowers of different colors. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 45: 223-233.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, D.A. 1979. The nature of plant species. Science 204: 381-384.
   Google Scholar
• Fragman, O., Shmida, A. 1995. Diversity and adaptation of Israeli Geophytes along an aridity gradient. Acta Hortic. 430: 795-802.
   Google Scholar
• Futuyma, D.J. 1986. Evolutionary biology. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland.
   Google Scholar
• Gardenfors, U., Hiolton-Taylor, C., Mace, G.M., Rodriguez, J.P. 2001. The application of IUCN Red List Criteria at regional levels. Conserv. Biol. 15: 1206-1212.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, P.Z., DeSalle, R. 2000. Phylogenetic species, nested hierarchies, and character fixation. Cladistics 16: 364-384.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, V. 1981. Plant speciation. Columbia University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, V.H. 1998. The species concepts as a socio-cultural phenomenon--a source of the scientific dilemma. Theory Biosci. 117: 203-212.
   Google Scholar
• Waddington, C.H. 1957. The strategy of the gene. George Allen & Unwin., London.
   Google Scholar
• Waser, N.M. 1998. Pollination, angiosperm speciation and the nature of species boundaries. Oikos 82: 198-201.
   Google Scholar
• Boyko, H. 1947. On the role of plants as quantitative climate indicators and the geo-ecological law of distribution. J. Ecol. 35: 138-157.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, A.J. 1958. Logic and memory in Linnaeus's system of taxonomy. Proc. Linn. Soc. London 169: 144-163.
   Google Scholar
• Claridge, M.F., Dawah, H.A., Wilson, M.R. 1997. Practical approaches to species concepts for living organisms. In: Claridge, M.F., Dawah, H.A., Wilson, M.R., eds. Species--the units of biodiversity. The Systematics Association Special Volume Series. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 1-15.
   Google Scholar
• Tillie, N., Chase, M.W., Hall, T. 2001. Molecular studies in the genus Iris L.: a preliminary study. International conference of Irises and Iridaceae: Biodiversity and Systematics, Rome, Italy. Ann. Bot. Nuova Serie 1(2): 105-112.
   Google Scholar
• Turesson, G. 1922. The genotypical response of the plant species to the habitat. Hereditas 3: 211-350.
   Google Scholar
• Shmida, A., Ivri, Y. 1996. The royal irises--lodging for male bees. Teva-Hadvarim 14: 32-49 (in Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Small, E., Fawzy, M. 1992. Morphogeographic variation in the Medicago monantha complex. Can. J. Bot. 70: 1292- 1301.
   Google Scholar
• Sneath, P.H.A., Sokal, R.R. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Steppan, S.J. 1991. Geographic distribution of flower morphological traits in subspecies of Lotus scoparius. J. Biogeogr. 18: 321-331.
   Google Scholar
• Rix, M. 1997. Section Oncocyclus (Siemssen). In: Baker, ed. The Species Group of the British Iris Society. A guide to species irises. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 62-90.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, H.E.H. 1985. The recognition concept of species. In: Vrba, E.S., ed. Species and speciation. Transvaal Museum Monograph 4, Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, Y., Shmida, A., Comes, H.P. 2001a. Iris bismarckiana in Israel and Jordan--new findings and taxonomic remarks. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 49: 229-235.
   Google Scholar
• van Valen, L. 1976. Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25: 233-239.
   Google Scholar
• Young, N.D. 1998. Pacific Coast Iris species delimitation using three species definitions: biological, phylogenetic and genealogical. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 63: 99-120.
   Google Scholar
• Waser, N.M., Chittka, L., Price, M.V., Williams, N.M., Ollerton, J. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77: 1043-1060.
   Google Scholar
• Arafeh, R.M.H., Sapir, Y., Shmida, A., Iraki, N., Fragman, O., Comes, H.P. 2002. Patterns of genetic and phenotypic variation in Iris haynei and I. atrofusca (Iris sect. Oncocyclus = the Royal Irises) along an environmental gradient in Israel and the West Bank. Mol. Ecol. 11: 39-53.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, O., Avishai, M. 2001. The irises still exist: the conservation status of species Iris section Oncocyclus in Israel, a century after their description. International conference of Irises and Iridaceae: Biodiversity and Systematics. Rome, Italy. Ann. Bot. Nuova Serie 1(2): 145-160.
   Google Scholar
• Avishai, M., Zohary, D. 1980. Genetic affinities among the Oncocyclus Irises. Bot. Gaz. 141: 107-115.
   Google Scholar
• Avishai, M., Zohary, D. 1977. Chromosomes in the Oncocyclus Irises. Bot. Gaz. 138:502-511.
   Google Scholar
• Mathew, B. 1989. The iris. Batsford, London.
   Google Scholar
• Mayden, R.L. 1997. A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. In: Claridge, M.F., Dawah, H.A., Wilson, M.R. eds. Species-- the units of biodiversity. The Systematics Association Special Volume Series. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 381- 424.
   Google Scholar
• Maddock, A., du Plessis, M.A. 1999. Can species data only be appropriately used to conserve biodiversity? Biodiversity Conserv. 8: 603-615.
   Google Scholar
• Mallet, J. 1995. A species definition for the modern synthesis. Trends Evol. Ecol. 10: 294-299.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, D.A. 1981. Dispersal versus gene flow in plants. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 68: 233-253.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, D.A. 2000. The origin, expansion, and demise of plant species. Oxford University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, G., Goldblatt, P., Rudall, P.J., Chase, M.W. 2001b. Molecular systematics of Iridaceae: a combined analysis of four plastid DNA sequence matrices. International conference of Irises and Iridaceae: Biodiversity and Systematics, Rome, Italy. Ann. Bot. Nuova Serie 1(2): 29-42.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., da Fonseca, G.A.B., Kent, J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853-858.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species from the viewpoint of a zoologist. Columbia University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, Y., Shmida, A., Fragman, O., Comes, H.P. 2002. Morphological variation of the Oncocyclus Irises (Iris: Iridaceae) in the Southern Levant. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 139: 369-382.
   Google Scholar
• Menzel, R., Shmida, A. 1993. The ecology of flower colours and the natural colour vision of insect pollinators: the Israeli flora as a study case. Biol. Rev. 68: 81-120.
   Google Scholar
• Michener, C.D. 1970. Diverse approaches to systematics. Evol. Biol. 4: 1-38.
   Google Scholar
• Montagnes, R.J.S., Vitt, D.H. 1991. Patterns of morphological variation in Messia triquetra (Bryospida, Meesiaceae) over an arctic-boreal gradient. Syst. Bot. 16: 726-735.
   Google Scholar
• Nevo, E. 1998. Molecular evolution and ecological stress at global, regional and local scales: the Israeli perspective. J. Exp. Zool. 282: 95-119.
   Google Scholar
• Niklas, K.J. 1997. The evolutionary biology of plants. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, K.C., Wheeler, Q.D. 1990. An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. Cladistics 6: 211-223.
   Google Scholar
• Dinsmore, J.E. 1934, Plantae Postianae et Dinsmoreanae. Vol. 2. American University Press, Beirut.
   Google Scholar
• Endler, J.A. 1977. Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar