On the Missed Opportunity Cost, Gud, and Estimating Environmental Quality

References

• Brown, J. S., Laundre, J. W., Gurung, M. 1999. The ecology of fear: Optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. J. Mammal. 80: 385-399.
   Google Scholar
• Buchholz, R. 2007. Behavioural biology: an effective and relevant conservation tool. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 401-407.
   Google Scholar
• Stenberg, M., Persson, A. 2006. Patch use behaviour in benthic fish depends on their long-term growth prospects. Oikos 112: 332-341.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, D. W., Krebs, J. R. 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, M. A., Breland, B. 1996. Foraging of gray squirrels on an urban-rural gradient: use of the GUD to assess anthropogenic impact. Ecol. Appl. 6: 1135-1142.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S. 1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22: 37-47.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S. 1992. Patch use under predation risk: I Models and predictions. Ann. Zool. Fennici 29: 301-309.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S. 1999. Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection: foraging under predation risk. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1: 49-71.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Alkon, P. U. 1990. Testing values of crested porcupine habitats by experimental food patches. Oecologia 83: 512-518.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Kotler, B. P. 2004. Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. Ecol. Lett. 7: 999-1014.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Kotler, B. P., Valone, T. J. 1994. Foraging under predation—a comparison of energetic and predation costs in rodent communities of the Negev and Sonoran deserts. Aust. J. Zool. 42: 435-448.
   Google Scholar
• Charnov, E. L. 1976. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor. Popul. Biol. 9: 129-136.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species. Murray, London.
   Google Scholar
• Fretwell, S. D., Lucas, H. L. J. 1969. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biother. 19: 16-36.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, J. A., Sutherland, W. J., Watkinson, A. R. 1996. A method to quantify the effects of human disturbance on animal populations. J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 786-792.
   Google Scholar
• Hochman, V., Kotler, B. P. 2006. Effects of food quality, diet preference and water on patch use by Nubian ibex. Oikos 112: 547-554.
   Google Scholar
• Holtcamp, W. N., Grant, W. E., Vinson, S. B. 1997. Patch use under predation hazard: effect of the red imported fire ant on deer mouse foraging behavior. Ecology 78: 308-317.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, B. P. 1997. Patch use by gerbils in a risky environment: manipulating food and safety to test four models. Oikos 78: 274-282.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, B. P., Brown, J. S., Dall, S. R. X., Gresser, S., Ganey, D., Bouskila, A. 2002. Foraging games between gerbils and their predators: temporal dynamics of resource depletion and apprehension in gerbils. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4: 495-518.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, B. P., Brown, J. S., Hasson, O. 1991. Factors affecting gerbil foraging behavior and rates of owl predation. Ecology 72: 2249-2260.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, B. P., Brown, J. S., Hickey, M. 1999. Food storability and the foraging behavior of fox squirrels (Sciurus niger). Am. Midl. Nat. 142: 77-86.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, B. P., Dickman, C. R., Brown, J. S. 1998. The effects of water on patch use by two Simpson Desert granivores (Corvus coronoides and Pseudomys hermannsburgensis). Aust. J. Ecol. 23: 574-578.
   Google Scholar
• Krebs, J. R., Davies, N. B. 1997. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, J. M., Houston, A. I. 1987. Starvation and predation as factors limiting population size. Ecology 68: 1515-1519.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, J. M., Houston, A. I. 1994. The effect of a change in foraging options on intake rate and predation rate. Am. Nat. 144: 978-1000.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D. W. 1997. Optimally foraging deer mice in prairie mosaics: a test of habitat theory and absence of landscape effects. Oikos 80: 31-43.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D. W., Davidson, D. L. 2000. Optimally foraging mice match patch use with habitat differences in fitness. Ecology 81: 2061-2066.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D. W., Mukherjee, S. 2007. Can we measure carrying capacity with foraging behavior? Ecology 88: 597-604.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, O., Holmgren, N. M. A. 1999. Gaining ecological information about Bayesian foragers through their behaviour. I. Models with predictions. Oikos 87: 251-263.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, O., Wiktander, U., Holmgren, N. M. A., Nilsson, S. G. 1999. Gaining ecological information about Bayesian foragers through their behaviour. II. A field test with woodpeckers. Oikos 87: 264-276.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, O., Wiktander, U., Nilsson, S. G. 2000. Daily foraging routines of a small bird feeding on a predictable resource. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 1457-1461.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, O., Wiktander, U., Malmqvist, A., Nilsson, S. G. 2001. Variability of patch type preferences in relation to resource availability and breeding success. Oecologia 127: 435-443.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, O., Brown, J. S., Smith, H. G. 2002. Long- and short-term state-dependent foraging under predation risk: an indication of habitat quality. Anim. Behav. 63: 981-989.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, A., Nilsson, E. 2007. Foraging behavior of benthic fish as an indicator of ecosystem state in shallow lakes. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 53: 407-421, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, A., Stenberg, M. 2006. Linking patch-use behavior, resource density, and growth expectations in fish. Ecology 87: 1953-1959.
   Google Scholar
• Pusenius, J., Schmidt, K. A. 2002. The effects of habitat manipulation on population distribution and foraging behavior in meadow voles. Oikos 98: 251-262.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, A. W., Kaufman, G. A., Kaufman, D. W. 2005. Rodent seed predation and GUDs: effect of burning and topography. Can. J. Zool. 83: 1297-1285.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, D. A., Hobbs, R. J., Margules, C. R. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation—a review. Conserv. Biol. 5: 18-32.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K. A. 1999. Foraging theory as a conceptual framework for studying nest predation. Oikos 85: 151-160.
   Google Scholar
• Shochat, E., Lerman, S. B., Katti, M., Lewis, D. B. 2004. Linking optimal foraging behavior to bird community structure in an urban-desert landscape: field experiments with artificial food patches. Am. Nat. 164: 232-243.
   Google Scholar
• Whelan, C. J. 2007. Augmenting population monitoring programs with behavioral indicators during ecological restorations. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 53: 279-295, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, B. A., Murphy, D. D. 1985. Conservation strategy—the effects of fragmentation on extinction. Am. Nat. 125: 879-887.
   Google Scholar
• Winterhalder, B. 1983. Opportunity-cost foraging models for stationary and mobile predators. Am. Nat. 122: 73-84.
   Google Scholar