Investigating Movement within Irregularly Shaped Patches: Analysis of Mark-Release-Recapture Data Using Randomization Procedures

References

• Hanski, I., Alho, J., Moilanen, A. 2000. Estimating the parameters of survival and migration of individuals in metapopulations. Ecology 81: 239-251.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, S., Gombert, J., Hovestadt, T., Poethke, H. J. 2003. Movement patterns of the bush cricket Platycleis albopunctata in different types of habitat: matrix is not always matrix. Ecological Entomology 28: 432-438.
   Google Scholar
• Armsworth, P. R., Roughgarden, J. E. 2005. The impact of directed versus random movement on population dynamics and biodiversity patterns. American Naturalist 165: 449-465.
   Google Scholar
• Auckland, J. N., Debinski, D. M., Clark, W. R. 2004. Survival, movement, and resource use of the butterfly Parnassius clodius.Ecological Entomology 29: 139-149.
   Google Scholar
• Baguette, M., Mennechez, G. 2004. Resource and habitat patches, landscape ecology and metapopulation biology: a consensual viewpoint. Oikos 106: 399-403.
   Google Scholar
• Baguette, M., Petit, S., Queva, F. 2000. Population spatial structure and migration of three butterfly species within the same habitat network: consequences for conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 100-108.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R.-I., Lineham, M.-E., Thomas, C.-D., Butlin R.-K. 2003. Measuring dispersal and detecting departures from a random walk model in a grasshopper hybrid zone. Ecological Entomology 28: 129-138.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, B. J., Bach, C. E. 2005. Habitat use by the federally endangered Mitchell's satyr butterfly (Neonympha mitchellii mitchellii) in a Michigan prairie fen. American Midland Naturalist 153: 41-51.
   Google Scholar
• Beissinger, S. R., McCullough, D. R., eds. 2002. Population viability analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 576 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, D. J., Fahrig, L. 2005. Matrix structure obscures the relationship between interpatch movement and patch size and isolation. Ecology 86: 1023-1033.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, P. G. 1997. Random diffusion models for animal movement. Ecological Modelling 100: 87-102.
   Google Scholar
• Cappuccino, N., Kareiva, P. 1985. Coping with a capricious environment—a population study of a rare Pierid butterfly. Ecology 66: 152-161.
   Google Scholar
• Conradt, L., Roper, T. J. 2006. Nonrandom movement behavior at habitat boundaries in two butterfly species: implications for dispersal. Ecology 87: 125-132.
   Google Scholar
• Conradt, L., Zollner, P.-A., Roper, T.-J., Frank, K., Thomas, C.-D. 2003. Foray search: an effective systematic dispersal strategy in fragmented landscapes. American Naturalist 161: 905-915.
   Google Scholar
• Creel, S. 1998. Social organization and effective population size in carnivores. In: Caro, T., ed. Behavioral ecology and conservation biology. Oxford University Press, NY, pp. 246-265.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, R. L. H. 2004. Butterfly habitats, broad-scale biotope affiliations, and structural exploitation of vegetation at finer scales: the matrix revisited. Ecological Entomology 29: 744-752.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, R. L. H., Sparks, T. H. 2006. When is a habitat not a habitat? Dramatic resource use changes under differing weather conditions for the butterfly Plebejus argus.Biological Conservation 129: 291-301.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, R.-L.-H., Shreeve, T.-G., van-Dyck, H. 2003. Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102: 417-426.
   Google Scholar
• Fred, M. S., O'Hara, R. B., Brommer, J. E. 2006. Consequences of the spatial configuration of resources for the distribution and dynamics of the endangered Parnassius apollo butterfly. Biological Conservation 130: 183-192.
   Google Scholar
• Gautestad, A. O., Mysterud, I. 1995. The home range ghost. Oikos 74: 195-204.
   Google Scholar
• Giuggioli, L., Abramson, G., Kenkre, V. M., Parmenter, R. R., Yates, T. L. 2006. Theory of home range estimation from displacement measurements of animal populations. Journal of Theoretical Biology 240: 126-135.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, D. F., Calogeropoulus, C. 2002. Measuring and modelling seed dispersal of terrestrial plants. In: Bullock, J. M., Kenward, R. E., Hails, R. S., eds. Dispersal ecology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp. 3-23.
   Google Scholar
• Grosbois, V., Tavecchia, G. 2003. Modeling dispersal with capture-recapture data: disentangling decisions of leaving and settlement. Ecology 84: 1225-1236.
   Google Scholar
• Hilborn, R., Mangel, M. 1997. The ecological detective. Confronting models with data. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 315 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Jeanson, R., Blanco, S., Fournier, R., Deneubourg, J.-L., Fourcassié, V., Theraulaz, G. 2003. A model of animal movements in a bounded space. Journal of Theoretical Biology 225: 443-451.
   Google Scholar
• Kindvall, O. 1999. Dispersal in a metapopulation of the bush cricket, Metrioptera bicolor (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 172-185.
   Google Scholar
• Lindenmayer, D. B., Possingham, H. P., Lacy, R. C., McCarthy, M. A., Pope, M. L. 2003. How accurate are population models? Lessons from landscape-scale tests in a fragmented system. Ecology Letters 6: 41-47.
   Google Scholar
• Mallet, J. 1986a. Dispersal and gene flow in a butterfly with home range behavior (Heliconius erato, Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Oecologia 68: 210-217.
   Google Scholar
• Mallet, J. 1986b. Gregarious roosting and home range in Heliconius butterflies. National Geographic Research 2: 198-215.
   Google Scholar
• Mennechez, G., Petit, S., Schtickzelle, N., Baguette, M. 2004. Modelling mortality and dispersal: consequences of parameter generalisation on metapopulation dynamics. Oikos 106: 243-252.
   Google Scholar
• Moorcroft, P. R., Lewis, M. A. 2006. Mechanistic home range analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 172 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Morales, J. M., Haydon, D. T., Frair, J., Holsinger, K. E., Fryxell, J. M. 2004. Extracting more out of relocation data: building movement models as mixtures of random walks. Ecology 85: 2436-2445.
   Google Scholar
• Nowicki, P., Witek, M., Skôrka, P., Settele, J., Woyciechowski, M. 2005a. Population ecology of the endangered butterflies Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous and the implications for conservation. Population Ecology 47: 193-202.
   Google Scholar
• Nowicki, P., Settele, J., Thomas, J. A., Woyciechowski M. 2005b. A review of population structure of Maculinea butterflies. In: Settele, J., Kühn, E., Thomas, J. A., eds. Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe. 2. Species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia/Moscow, pp. 144-149.
   Google Scholar
• Ovaskainen, O. 2004. Habitat-specific movement parameters estimated using mark-recapture data and a diffusion model. Ecology 85: 242-257.
   Google Scholar
• Ovaskainen, O., Cornell, S. J. 2003. Biased movement at a boundary and conditional occupancy times for diffusion processes. Journal of Applied Probability 40: 557-580.
   Google Scholar
• Ovaskainen, O., Hanski, I. 2004. From individual behavior to metapopulation dynamics: Unifying the patchy population and classic metapopulation models. American Naturalist 164: 364-377.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, M. A., Andrick, U. R., Frey, W., Settele J. 2000. On the ethology and ecology of a small and isolated population of the Dusky Large Blue Butterfly Glaucopsyche (Maculinea) nausithous (Lycaenidae). Nota Lepidopterologica 23: 147-172.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team 2007. R: A language and environment for statistical computing Vers. 2.5.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Ries, L., Debinski, D. M. 2001. Butterfly responses to habitat edges in the highly fragmented prairies of Central Iowa. Journal of Animal Ecology 70: 840-852.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. A., Matter, S. F., Roland, J. 2005. Edge avoidance and movement of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus in matrix and non-matrix habitat. Landscape Ecology 20: 127-135.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, J. J. L., Alford, R. A. 2007. Movement patterns and habitat use of rainforest stream frogs in northern Queensland, Australia: implications for extinction vulnerability. Wildlife Research 34: 371-378.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. 2003. The influence of spatial scale on quantifying insect dispersal: an analysis of butterfly data. Ecological Entomology 28: 252-256.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., Dover, J., Fry, G. L. A. 2003. Movement of two grassland butterflies in the same habitat network: the role of adult resources and size of the study area. Ecological Entomology 28: 219-227.
   Google Scholar
• Schtickzelle, N., Baguette, M. 2003. Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration-patch area relationships in fragmented landscapes. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 533-545.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, C. B. 1998. Dispersal behavior and its implication for reserve design in a rare Oregon butterfly. Conservation Biology 12: 284-292.
   Google Scholar
• Settele, J., Kühn, E., Thomas, J. A., eds. 2005. Species ecology along a European gradient 2: Maculinea butterflies as a Model. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia/Moscow, 289 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, I. E., Hodgman, G. W. 1974. Reentrant polygon clipping. Communications of the ACM 17: 32-42.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. A. 1995. The ecology and conservation of Maculinea arion and other European species of large blue. In: Pullin, A. S., ed. Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 180-196.
   Google Scholar
• Turchin, P. 1998. Quantitative analysis of movement. Measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyck, H., Baguette, M. 2005. Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: Routine or special movements? Basic and Applied Ecology 6: 535-545.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. J., Thomas, C. D. 2002. Dispersal and the spatial dynamics of butterfly populations. In: Bullock, J. M., Kenward, R. E., Hails R. S., eds. Dispersal ecology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, pp. 257-278.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics 28: 114-138.
   Google Scholar