Butterflies in and for conservation: Trends and Prospects

References

• Harrison, S. 1991. Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42: 73-88.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, S., Kunin, W. E. 2003. Scale dependency of rarity, extinction risk, and conservation priority. Conservation Biology 17: 1559-1570.
   Google Scholar
• Spangenberg, J. H. 2007. Integrated scenarios for assessing biodiversity risks. Sustainable Development 15: 343-356.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. D., Mallorie, H. C. 1985. Rarity, species richness and conservation: butterflies of the Atlas mountains in Morocco. Biological Conservation 33: 95-117.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, P. R., Murphy, D. D., Singer, M. C., Sherwood, C. B., White, R. R., Brown, I. L. 1980. Extinction, reduction, stability and increase: the responses of checkerspot butterfly populations to the California drought. Oecologia 46: 101-105.
   Google Scholar
• Fleishman, E., Murphy, D. D., Brussard, P. E. 2000. A new method for selection of umbrella species for conservation planning. Ecological Applications 10: 569-579.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, R. T. T. 1995. Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Grill, A., Cleary, D. F. R. 2003. Diversity patterns in butterfly communities of the Greek nature reserve Dadia. Biological Conservation 114: 427-436.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, V. 1999. Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: what have we learned and what could we learn in the future? Ecological Modelling 115: 129-148.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, V., Railsback, S. F. 2005. Individual-based modeling and ecology. Princeton series in theoretical and computational biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Guisan, A., Thuiller, W. 2005. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters 8: 993-1009.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad, N. M. 1999a. Corridor and distance effects on interpatch movements: a landscape experiment with butterflies. Ecological Applications 9: 612-622.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad, N. M. 1999b. Corridor use predicted from behaviors at habitat boundaries. American Naturalist 153: 215-227.
   Google Scholar
• Hanski, I. 1991. Single-species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42: 17-38.
   Google Scholar
• Hanski, I., Kuussaari, M., Nieminen, M. 1994. Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia.Ecology 75: 747-762.
   Google Scholar
• Hanski, I., Moilanen, A., Pakkala, T., Kuussaari, M. 1996. The quantitative incidence function model and persistence of an endangered butterfly metapopulation. Conservation Biology 10: 578-590.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, R. K., Luoto, M., Araujo, M. B., Virkkala, R., Thuiller, W., Sykes, M. T. 2006. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modeling under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography 30: 751-777.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, R. K., Luoto, M., Virkkala, R., Pearson, R. G., Korber, J. H. 2007a. Biotic interactions improve prediction of boreal bird distributions at macro-scales. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16: 754-763.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, R. K., Luoto, M., Kuussaari, M., Toivonen, T. 2007b. Modelling the spatial distribution of a threatened butterfly: impacts of scale and statistical technique. Landscape and Urban Planning 79: 347-357.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, S., Binzenhoefer, B., Poethke, H.-J., Biedermann, R., Settele, J., Schroeder, B. 2007. The generality of habitat suitability models: a practical test with two insect groups. Basic and Applied Ecology 8: 310-320.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J. K., Thomas, C. D., Lewis, O. T. 1996. Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: implications for metapopulation structure. Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 725-735.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkinson, P., Travis, J. M. J., Evans, J., Gregory, R. D., Telfer, M. G., Williams, P. H. 2001. Flexibility and the use of indicator taxa in the selection of sites for nature reserves. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 271-285.
   Google Scholar
• Hovestadt, T., Nowicki, P. 2008. Investigating movement within irregularly shaped patches: Analysis of mark-release-recapture data using randomization procedures. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 137-154, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P. C., Viskanic, P., Davenport, T. R. B., Kigenyi, F. W., Baltzer, M., Dickinson, C. J., Lwanga, J. S., Matthews, R. A., Balmford, A. 1998. Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 394: 472-475.
   Google Scholar
• Johst, K., Drechsler, M., Thomas, J. A., Settele, J. 2006. Influence of mowing on the persistence of two endangered large blue butterfly species. Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 333-342.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, J. T. 2001. Butterfly species richness patterns in Canada: energy, heterogeneity, and the potential consequences of climate change. Conservation Ecology 5: U131-U147.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, J. T., Sugar, A., Packer, L. 2000. Indicator taxa, rapid biodiversity assessment, and nestedness in an endangered ecosystem. Conservation Biology 14: 1726-1734.
   Google Scholar
• Kühn, E., Feldmann, R., Harpke, A., Hirneisen, N., Musche, M., Leopold, P., Settele, J. 2008. Getting the public involved in butterfly conservation: lessons learned from a new monitoring scheme in Germany. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 89-103, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Kuussaari, M., Nieminen, M., Hanski, I. 1996. An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia.Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 791-801.
   Google Scholar
• Ladwig, M., Settele, J. 2005. Bye, bye, butterfly (original: "Bye, bye, Schmetterling")—TV documentation (abstract). In: Kühn, E., Feldmann, R., Thomas, J. A., Settele, J., eds. Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, Vol. I: General concepts and case studies. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia/Moscow, pp. 3-4.
   Google Scholar
• Launer, A. E., Murphy, D. D. 1994. Umbrella species and the conservation of habitat fragments: a case of a threatened butterfly and a vanishing grassland ecosystem. Biological Conservation 69: 145-153.
   Google Scholar
• Lindenmayer, D. B., Franklin, J. F., eds. 2002. Conserving forest biodiversity: a comprehensive multiscaled approach. Island Press, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Andelman, S. J., Fagan, W. F. 2000. Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 97: 5954-5959.
   Google Scholar
• Araujo, M. B., Luoto, M. 2007. The importance of biotic interactions for modeling species distributions under climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16: 743-753.
   Google Scholar
• Araujo, M. B., Guisan, A. 2006. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography 33: 1677-1688.
   Google Scholar
• Baguette, M. 2003. Long distance dispersal and landscape occupancy in a metapopulation of the cranberry fritillary butterfly. Ecography 26: 153-160.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, K. O., Askling, J., Ekberg, O., Ignell, H., Wahlman, H., Milberg, P. 2004. Landscape effects on butterfly assemblages in an agricultural region. Ecography 27: 619-628.
   Google Scholar
• Betrus, C. J., Fleishman, E., Blair, R. B. 2005. Cross-taxonomic potential and spatial transferability of an umbrella species index. Journal of Environmental Management 74: 79-87.
   Google Scholar
• Binzenhöfer, B., Biedermann, R., Settele, J., Schroeder, B. 2008. Connectivity compensates for low habitat quality and small patch size in the butterfly Cupido minimus.Ecological Research 23: 259-269.
   Google Scholar
• Boggs, C. L., Watt, W. B., Ehrlich, P. R. 2003. Butterflies: ecology and evolution taking flight. Universitry of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. K. S., Freitas, A. V. L. 2000. Atlantic Forest butterflies: indicators for landscape conservation. Biotropica 32: 934-956.
   Google Scholar
• Conradt, L., Roper, T. J., Thomas, C. D. 2001. Dispersal behaviour of individuals in metapopulations of two British butterflies. Oikos 95: 416-424.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, R. L. H. 1993. Butterflies and climate change. Manchester University Press, Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Drechsler, M., Grimm, V., Mysiak, J., Waetzold, F. 2007a. Differences and similarities between ecological and economic models for biodiversity conservation. Ecological Economics 62: 232-241.
   Google Scholar
• Drechsler, M., Waetzold, F., Johst, K., Bergmann, H., Settele, J. 2007b. A model-based approach for designing cost-effective compensation payments for conservation of endangered species in real landscapes. Biological Conservation 140: 174-186.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, P. R., Hanski, I. 2004. On the wings of checkerspots: a model system for population biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. D., Singer, M. C., Boughton, D. A. 1996. Catastrophic extinction of population sources in a butterfly metapopulation. American Naturalist 148: 957-975.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. A. 2005. Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360: 339-357.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. A., Telfer, M. G., Roy, D. B., Preston, C. D., Greenwood, J. J. D., Asher, J., Fox, R., Clarke, R. T., Lawton, J. H. 2004. Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303: 1879-1881.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. A., R. T., C., Randle, Z., Simcox, D. J., Schoenrogge, K., Elmes, G. W., Wardlaw, J. C., Settele, J. 2005. Maculinea and myrmecophiles as sensitive indicators of grassland butterflies (umbrella species), ants (keystone species) and other invertebrates. In: Settele, J., Kühn, E., Thomas, J. A., eds. Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, Vol. 2: Species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a Model. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia/Moscow, pp. 28-31.
   Google Scholar
• Ulbrich, K., Drechsler, M., Waetzold, F., Johst, K., Settele, J. 2008. A software tool for designing cost-effective compensation payments for conservation measures. Environmental Modelling and Software 23: 122-123.
   Google Scholar
• van Dyck, H., Baguette, M. 2005. Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: routine or special movements? Basic and Applied Ecology 6: 535-545.
   Google Scholar
• van Swaay, C., van Strien, A. 2005. Using butterfly monitoring data to develop a European grassland butterfly indicator. In: Kühn, E., Thomas, J., Feldmann, R., Settele, J., eds. Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe. Vol. 1. General concepts and case studies. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia/Moscow, pp. 106-108.
   Google Scholar
• van Swaay, C., Warren, M. 1999. Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera). Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg (Nature and Environment Series No. 99).
   Google Scholar
• van Swaay, C., Warren, M. 2003. Prime butterfly areas in Europe: priority sites for conservation. Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries. The Netherlands, 695 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlberg, N., Moilanen, A., Hanski, I. 1996. Predicting the occurrence of endangered species in fragmented landscapes. Science 273: 1536-1539.
   Google Scholar
• Weibull, A. C., Bengtsson, J., Nohlgren, E. 2000. Diversity of butterflies in the agricultural landscape: the role of farming system and landscape heterogeneity. Ecography 23: 743-750.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, S. B., Murphy, D. D., White, R. R. 1988. Sun, slope and butterflies: topographic determinants of habitat quality for Euphydryas editha.Ecology 69: 1486-1496.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, B. A., Murphy, D. D., Ehrlich, P. R., Austin, G. T. 1986. Insular biography of the montane butterfly faunas in the Great Basin: comparison with birds and mammals. Oecologia 69: 188-194.
   Google Scholar
• Luoto, M., Virkkala, R., Heikkinen, R. K. 2007. The role of land cover in bioclimatic models depends on spatial resolution. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16: 34-42.
   Google Scholar
• Moilanen, A., Hanski, I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79: 2503-2515.
   Google Scholar
• New, T. R. 1991. Butterfly conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• New, T. R. 1993. Conservation biology of Lycaenidae (butterflies). IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• New, T. R., Pyle, R. M., Thomas, J. A., Thomas, C. D., Hammond, P. C. 1995. Butterfly conservation management. Annual Review of Entomology 40: 57-83.
   Google Scholar
• Nowicki, P., Settele, J., Henry, P.-Y., Woyciechowski, M. 2008. Butterfly monitoring methods: the ideal and the real world. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 69-88, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Oostermeijer, J. G. B., Van-Swaay, C. A. M. 1998. The relationship between butterflies and environmental indicator values: A tool for conservation in a changing landscape. Biological Conservation 86: 271-280.
   Google Scholar
• Ovaskainen, O., Cornell, S. J. 2003. Biased movement at a boundary and conditional occupancy times for diffusion processes. Journal of Applied Probability 40: 557-580.
   Google Scholar
• Parmesan, C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 37: 637-669.
   Google Scholar
• Parmesan, C., Ryrholm, N., Steganescu, C., Hill, J. K., Thomas, C. D., Descimon, H., Huntley, B., Kaila, L., Kullberg, J., Tammaru, T., Tennent, W. J., Thomas, J. A., Warren, W. 1999. Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399: 579-583.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, R. G., Dawson, T. P. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecology and Biogeography 12: 361-371.
   Google Scholar
• Pe'er, G., Benyamini, D. 2008. A template for publishing the ‘conservation chain’ from problem identification to practical action, exemplified through the campaign for butterfly protection in Israel. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 19-39, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Pe'er, G., Settele, J. 2008. The rare butterfly Tomares nesimachus (Lycaenidae) as a bioindicator for pollination services and ecosystem functioning in northern Israel. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 111-136, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Pe'er, G., Saltz, D., Thulke, H.-H., Motro, U. 2004. Response to topography in a hilltopping butterfly and implications for modelling nonrandom dispersal. Animal Behaviour 68: 825-839.
   Google Scholar
• Pe'er, G., Saltz, D., Frank, K. 2005. Virtual corridors for conservation management. Conservation Biology 19: 1997-2003.
   Google Scholar
• Pe'er, G., Heinz, S. K., Frank, K. 2006. Connectivity in heterogeneous landscapes: analyzing the effect of topography. Landscape Ecology 21: 47-61.
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel, D., Wilson, C., McCullum, C., Huang, R., Dwen, P., Flack, J., Tran, Q., Saltman, T., Cliff, B. 1997. Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversity. BioScience 47: 747-757.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts, T. H. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. American Naturalist 158: 87-99.
   Google Scholar
• Roland, J., Keyghobadi, N., Fownes, S. 2000. Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size. Ecology 81: 1642-1653.
   Google Scholar
• Schtickzelle, N., Baguette, M. 2003. Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration-patch area relationships in fragmented landscapes. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 533-545.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, C. B., Crone, E. E. 2001. Edge-mediated dispersal behavior in a prairie butterfly. Ecology 82: 1879-1892.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, C. B., Crone, E. E. 2008. Using ecological theory to advance butterfly conservation. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 63-68, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, C. B., Russell, C., Wynn, L. 2008. Restoration, reintroduction and captive propagation for at-risk butterflies: a review of British and American conservation efforts. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 41-61, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Tzachor, R., Izhaki, I., Perevolotsky, A. 2008. The role of seasonality and climatic factors in shaping the community composition of Mediterranean butterflies. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 105-110, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Schweiger, O., Settele, J., Kudrna, O., Klotz, S., Kühn, I. 2008. Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of tophically interacting species. Ecology, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Settele, J., Hammen, V., Hulme, P., Karlson, U., Klotz, S., Kotarac, M., Kunin, W., Marion, G., O'Connor, M., Petanidou, T., Peterson, K., Potts, S., Pritchard, H., Pysek, P., Rounsevell, M., Spangenberg, J., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Sykes, M., Vighi, M., Zobel, M., Kühn, I. 2005. ALARM—Assessing LArge-scale environmental Risks for biodiversity with tested Methods. GAIA—Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 14: 69-72.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, M. C. 1972. Complex components of habitat suitability within a butterfly colony. Science 176: 75-77.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, M. C., Thomas, C. D. 1996. Evolutionary responses of a butterfly metapopulation to human and climate-caused environmental variation. American Naturalist 148: S9-39.
   Google Scholar
• Sizling, A. L., Storch, D. 2004. Power-law species-area relationships and self-similar species distributions within finite areas. Ecology Letters 7: 60-68.
   Google Scholar
• Skorka, P., Settele, J., Woyciechowski, M. 2007. Effects of management cessation on grassland butterflies in southern Poland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 121: 319-324.
   Google Scholar