Getting the Public Involved in Butterfly Conservation: Lessons Learned from a New Monitoring Scheme in Germany

References

• Asher, J., Warren, M. S., Fox, R., Harding, P. T., Jeffcoate, G., Jeffcoate, S. 2001. The millennium atlas of butterflies in Great Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Chevan, A., Sutherland, M. 1991. Hierarchical partitioning. American Statistician 45: 90-96.
   Google Scholar
• Erhardt, A. 1985. Wiesen und Brachland als Lebensraum für Schmetterlinge. Eine Feldstudie im Tavetsch (GR), Birkhäuser, Basel.
   Google Scholar
• Erhardt, A., Thomas, J. A. 1991. Lepidoptera as indicators of change in the semi-natural grasslands of lowland and upland Europe. In: Collins, M., Thomas, J. A., eds. The conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic Press, London, pp. 213-236.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, P. T., Asher, J., Yates, T. J. 1995. Butterfly monitoring I—recording the changes. In: Pullin, A. S., ed. Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman & Hall, London, p. 20.
   Google Scholar
• Hintermann, U., Weber, D., Zangger, A. 2000. Biodiversity monitoring in Switzerland. Schriftenreihe für Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz 62: 47-58.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, P., Vischer-Leopold, M. 2005. Monitoring tagaktiver Schmetterlinge in Nordrhein-Westfalen. LÖBF-Mitteilungen Nr. 2/2005: 2-7.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Nally, R. 2002. Multiple regression and interference in conservation biology and ecology: further comments on identifying important predictor variables. Biodiversity and Conservation 11: 1397-1401.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, E. 1977. Method for assessing changes in abundance of butterflies. Biological Conservation 12: 115-134.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, E., Yates, T. J. 1993. Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. Chapman and Hall, London.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2006. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Randle, Z., Simcox, D. J., Schönrogge, K., Wardlaw, J. C., Thomas, J. A. 2005. Myrmica ants as keystone species and Maculinea arion as an indicator of rare niches in UK grasslands. In: Settele, J., Kühn E., Thomas, J. A., eds. Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, Vol. 2: Species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model. Pensoft, Sofia/Moscow, pp. 26-27.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhardt, R., Sbieschne, H., Settele, J., Fischer, U., Fiedler, G. 2007. Tagfalter von Sachsen. In: Klausnitzer, B., Reinhardt, R., eds. Beiträge zur Insektenfauna Sachsens Band 6. Entomologischen Nachrichten und Berichte, Beiheft 11, Dresden.
   Google Scholar
• Settele, J., Hammen, V., Hulme, P., Karlson, U., Klotz, S., Kotarac, M., Kunin, W., Marion, G., O'Connor, M., Petanidou, T., Peterson, K., Potts, S., Pritchard, H., Pysek, P., Rounsevell, M., Spangenberg, J., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Sykes, M., Vighi, M., Zobel, M., Kühn, I. 2005. ALARM—Assessing LArge-scale environmental Risks for biodiversity with tested Methods. GAIA—Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 14(1): 69-72.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanescu, C., Dantart, L., Lewington, R., Llobet, T., Miquel, A., Salas, J. R. 2001. Estat de la xarxa del Butterfly Monitoring, Scheme a Catalunya l'any 2001. Cynthia 1: 3-15.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. A. 2005. Monitoring changes in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 360: 339-357.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. A., Morris, M. G. 1994. Patterns, mechanisms and rates of extinction among invertebrates in the United Kingdom. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 344: 47-54.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. A., Telfer, M. G., Roy, D. B., Preston, C. D., Greenwood, J. J. D., Asher, J., Fox, R., Clarke, R. T., Lawton, J. H. 2004. Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303: 1879-1881.
   Google Scholar
• van Swaay, C. A. M. 1996. Handleiding Dagvlindermointoring. De Vlinderstichting, Wageningen.
   Google Scholar
• van Swaay, C. A. M., Maes, D., Plate, C. 1997. Monitoring butterflies in the Netherlands and Flanders: the first results. Journal of Insect Conservation 1: 81-87.
   Google Scholar
• van Swaay, C. A. M., Warren, M. S. 1999. Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment 99: 1-260.
   Google Scholar
• van Swaay, C. A. M., van Strien, A. 2005. Using butterfly monitoring data to develop a European grassland butterfly indicator. In: Kuehn, E., Thomas, J. A., Feldmann, R., Settele, J., eds. Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, Vol. 1: general concepts and case studies. Pensoft, Sofia/Moscow, pp. 106-107.
   Google Scholar
• van Swaay, C. A. M., Warren, M. S., Lois, G. 2006. Biotope use and trends of European butterflies. Journal of Insect Conservation 10: 189-209.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M., Hill, J. K., Thomas, J. A., Asher, J., Fox, R., Huntley, B., Roy, D. B., Telfer, M. G., Jeffcoate, G., Jeffcoate, S., Harding, P., Willis, S. G., Greatorex-Davies, J. N., Moss, D., Thomas, C. D. 2001. Rapid response of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414: 65-69.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, D., Hintermann, U., Zangger, A. 2004. Scale and trends in species richness: considerations for monitoring biological diversity for political purposes. Global Ecology and Biogeography 13
   Google Scholar