Habitat Selection and Niche Conservatism

References

• Ackerly, D.D. 2003. Community assembly, niche conservatism, and adaptive evolution in changing environments. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164 (Supplement): S165-S184.
   Google Scholar
• Blows, M.W., Hoffmann, A.A. 2005. A reassessment of genetic limits to evolutionary change. Ecology 86: 1371-1384.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, A.D. 1991. Genostasis and the limits to evolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 333: 289-305.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J.S., Pavlovic, N.B. 1992. Evolution in heterogeneous environments: effect of migration on habitat specialization. Evol. Ecol. 6: 360-382.
   Google Scholar
• Burger, R., Lynch, M. 1995. Evolution and extinction in a changing environment: a quantitative-genetic analysis. Evolution 49: 151-163.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, G.L. 1994. Sympatric speciation in animals: new wine in old bottles. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 285-288.
   Google Scholar
• Case, T.J., Holt, R.D., McPeek, M. 2005. The community context of species borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Oikos 108: 28-46.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, J.M., Leibold, M.A. 2003. Ecological niches: linking classical and contemporary approaches. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Coope, G.R. 1979. Late-Cenozoic fossil Coleoptera: evolution, biogeography, and ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10: 247-267.
   Google Scholar
• De Meeus, T., Michalakis, Y., Renaud, F., Olivieri, I. 1993. Polymorphism in heterogeneous environments, evolution of habitat selection and sympatric speciation—soft and hard selection models. Evol. Ecol. 7: 175-198.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, S.R., Bush, G.L. 1989. The role of habitat preference in adaptation and speciation. In: Otte, D., Endler, J.A., eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp. 345-365.
   Google Scholar
• Edelaar, P., Siepielski, A. M., Clobert, J. 2008. Matching habitat choice causes directed gene flow: a neglected dimension in evolution and ecology. Ecology 62: 2462-2472.
   Google Scholar
• Filin, I., Holt, R.D., Barfield, M. 2008. The relation of density regulation to habitat specialization, evolution of a species' range, and the dynamics of biological invasions. Am. Nat. 172: 233-247.
   Google Scholar
• Fretwell, S.D. 1972. Populations in a seasonal environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Fretwell, S.D., Lucas, H.L. Jr. 1969. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor. 19:16-36.
   Google Scholar
• Futuyma, D.J., Moreno, G. 1988. The evolution of ecological specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19: 207-233.
   Google Scholar
• Gomulkiewicz, R., Holt, R.D. 1995. When does evolution by natural selection prevent extinction? Evolution 49: 201-207.
   Google Scholar
• Gomulkiewicz, R., Holt, R.D., Barfield, M. 1999. The effects of density dependence and immigration on local adaptation and niche evolution in a black-hole sink environment. Theor. Popul. Biol. 55: 283-296.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, T.F., Houle, D. 2004. Evolvability, stabilizing selection, and the problem of stasis. In: Pigliucci, M., Preston, K., eds. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 130-150.
   Google Scholar
• Hedrick, P.W. 1990. Genotypic-specific habitat selection: a new model and its application. Heredity 65: 145-149.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, R.D. 1985. Population dynamics in two-patch environments: some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution. Theor. Popul. Biol. 28: 181-208.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, R.D. 1987. Population dynamics and evolutionary processes: the manifold roles of habitat selection. Evol. Ecol. 1: 331-347.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, R.D. 1996. Demographic constraints in evolution: towards unifying the evolutionary theories of senescence and niche conservatism. Evol. Ecol. 10: 1-11.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, R.D. 2003. On the evolutionary ecology of species ranges. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5: 159-178.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, R., Gaines, M. 1992. The analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes: implications for the evolution of fundamental niches. Evol. Ecol. 6: 433-447.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, R.D., Gomulkiewicz, R. 2004. Conservation implications of niche conservatism and evolution in heterogeneous environments. In: Ferrière, R., Dieckmann, U., Couvet, D., eds. Evolutionary conservation biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 244-264.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, R.D., Gomulkiewicz, R., Barfield, M. 2003. The phenomenology of niche evolution via quantitative traits in a ‘black-hole’ sink. Proc. R. Soc. London B 270: 215-224.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, R.D., Barfield, M., Gomulkiewicz, R. 2004a. Temporal variation can facilitate niche evolution in harsh sink environments. Am. Nat. 164: 187-200.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, R.D., Knight, T.M., Barfield, M. 2004b. Allee effects, immigration, and the evolution of species' niches. Am. Nat. 163: 253-262.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, R.D., Barfield, M., Gomulkiewicz, R. 2005. Theories of niche conservatism and evolution: could exotic species be potential tests? In: Sax, D., Stachowicz, J., Gaines, S.D., eds. Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution, and biogeography. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp. 259-290.
   Google Scholar
• Jaenike, J., Holt, R.D. 1991. Genetic variation for habitat preference: evidence and explanation. Am. Nat. 137: S67-S90.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J.S. 1980. Can genes choose habitats? Nature 286: 757-758.
   Google Scholar
• Kawecki, T.J. 1995. Demography of source-sink populations and the evolution of ecological niches. Evol. Ecol. 9: 38-44.
   Google Scholar
• Kawecki, T.J. 2000. Adaptation to marginal habitats: contrasting influence of the dispersal rate on the fate of alleles with small and large effects. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 267: 1315-1320.
   Google Scholar
• Kawecki, T.J., Holt, R.D. 2002. Evolutionary consequences of asymmetric dispersal rates. Am. Nat. 160: 333-347.
   Google Scholar
• Kinnison, M.T., Hendry, A.P. 2001. The pace of modern life. II. From rates of contemporary microevolution to pattern and process. Genetica 112-113: 145-164.
   Google Scholar
• Krivan, V. 2003. Ideal free distributions when resources undergo population dynamics. Theor. Popul. Biol. 64: 25-38.
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur, R.H., Wilson, E.O. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard Smith, J. 1966. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100: 637-650.
   Google Scholar
• Odling-Smee, F.J., Laland, K.N., Feldman, M.W. 2003. Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Pease, C.M., Lande, R., Bull, J.J. 1989. A model of population-growth, dispersal and evolution in a changing environment. Ecology 70(6): 1657-1664.
   Google Scholar
• Ravigne, V., Olivieri, I., Dieckmann, U. 2004. Implications of habitat choice for protected polymorphisms. Evol. Ecol. Res. 6: 125-145.
   Google Scholar
• Reznick, D.N., Ghalambor, C.K. 2001. The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica 112-113: 183-198.
   Google Scholar
• Ronce, O., Kirkpatrick, M. 2001. When sources become sinks: migrational meltdown in heterogeneous habitats. Evolution 55(8): 1520-1531.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M.L. 1981. A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62: 327-335.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M.L. 1987. Habitat selection as a source of biological diversity. Evol. Ecol. 1: 315-330.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M.L. 1991. Habitat selection and population interactions—the search for mechanisms. Am. Nat. 137: S5-S28.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K.A., Earnhardt, J.M., Brown, J.S., Holt, R.D. 2000. Habitat selection under temporal heterogeneity: sinking the ghost of competition past. Ecology 81: 2622-2630.
   Google Scholar
• Schoener, T.W., Schoener, A. 1976. Ecological context of female pattern polymorphism in lizard Anolis sagrei. Evolution 30: 650-658.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C.E. 1976. Genetic variation in heterogeneous environments. Genetics 83: 887-894.
   Google Scholar
• Whitlock, M.C. 1996. The red queen beats the jack-of-all-trades: the limitations on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity and niche breadth. Am. Nat. 148 (Supplement): S65-S77.
   Google Scholar
• Wiens, J.J., Graham, C.H. 2005. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S. 36: 519-539.
   Google Scholar