Simulation Studies of Ideal Free Distribution and Competition

References

• Abrams, P.A. 2007. Habitat choice in predator-prey systems: spatial instability due interacting adaptive movements. Am. Nat. 169: 581-594.
   Google Scholar
• Abrams, P.A., Cressman, R., Krivan, V. 2007. The role of behavioral dynamics in determining the patch distributions of interacting species. Am. Nat. 169: 505-518.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, R.A., McGehee, R. 1980. Competitive exclusion. Am. Nat. 115: 151-170.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, S., Samietz, J., Berger, U. 2005. Sexual harassment in heterogeneous landscapes can mediate population regulation in a grasshopper. Behav. Ecol. 16: 239-246.
   Google Scholar
• Bélanger, G., Rodríguez, M. A. 2002. Local movement as a measure of habitat quality in stream salmonids. Environ. Biol. Fish. 64: 155-164.
   Google Scholar
• Berec, M., Krivan, V., Berec, L. 2006. Asymmetric competition, body size, and foraging tactics: testing the ideal free distribution in two competing fish species. Evol. Ecol. Res. 8: 929-942.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J.S. 1998. Game theory and habitat selection. In: Dugatkin, L.A., Reeve, H.K., eds. Game theory and animal behavior. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, pp. 188-220.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, D., Bowman, J., Wilson, P.J. 2007. Density-dependent dispersal suggests a genetic measure of habitat suitability Oikos 116: 629-635.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, C., Collins, N.C., Lester, N.P., Shuter, B.J. 2006. Population dynamics of smallmouth bass in response to habitat supply. Ecol. Model. 195: 349-362.
   Google Scholar
• Cressman, R., Krivan, V. 2006. Migration dynamics for the ideal free distribution. Am. Nat. 168: 384-397.
   Google Scholar
• Cressman, R., Krivan, V., Garay, J. 2004. Ideal free distributions, evolutionary games, and population dynamics in multiple-species environments. Am. Nat. 164: 473-489.
   Google Scholar
• Desharnais R.A., Edmunds, J., Costantino, R.F., Henson, S.M. 2005. Species competition: uncertainty on double invariant loop. J. Diff. Equat. Appl. 11: 311-325.
   Google Scholar
• Donahue, M.J. 2006. Allee effects and conspecific cueing jointly lead to conspecific attraction. Oecologia 149: 33-43.
   Google Scholar
• Englert, T.L., Wells, A.W., Norris, R.A. 2000. Incorporation of changes in habitat quantity and quality into density-dependent population models. Environ. Sci. Policy 3: 451-458.
   Google Scholar
• Fretwell, S.D., Lucas, H.L. Jr. 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor. 19: 16-36.
   Google Scholar
• Ghent, A.W. 1963. Studies of behavior of Tribolium flour beetles. I. Contrasting responses of T. castaneum and T. confusum to fresh and conditioned flours. Ecology 44: 269-283.
   Google Scholar
• Grand, T.C. 2002. Alternative forms of competition and predation dramatically affect habitat selection under foraging—predation-risk trade-offs. Behav. Ecol. 13: 280-290.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, C.M., Stamps, J.A. 2001. Habitat selection at low population densities. Ecology 82: 2091-2100.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, C.G., Moorhead, D.L. 2002. Density-dependent habitat selection: evaluating isoleg theory with a Lotka-Volterra model. Oikos 97: 184-194.
   Google Scholar
• Heithaus, M.R. 2001. Habitat selection by predators and prey in communities with asymmetrical intraguild predation. Oikos 92: 542-554.
   Google Scholar
• Krivan, V. 2003. Ideal free distributions when resources undergo population dynamics. Theor. Popul. Biol. 64: 25-38.
   Google Scholar
• Krivan, V., Sirot, E. 2002. Habitat selection by two competing species in a two-habitat environment. Am. Nat. 160: 214-234.
   Google Scholar
• Krivan, V., Vrkoc, I. 2007. A Lyapunov function for piecewise-independent differential equations: stability of the ideal free distribution in two patch environments. J. Math. Biol. 54: 465-488.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W. 1987. Tests of density-dependent habitat selection in a patchy environment. Ecol. Monogr. 57: 269-281.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W. 1988. Habitat-dependent population regulation and community structure. Evol. Ecol. 2: 253-269.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W. 1998. State-dependent optimization of litter size. Oikos 83: 518-528.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W. 1999a. Has the ghost of competition passed? Evol. Ecol. Res. 1: 3-20.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W. 1999b. A haunting legacy from isoclines: mammal coexistence and the ghost of competition. J. Mammal. 80: 375-384.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W. 2003. Shadows of predation: habitat-selecting consumers eclipse competition between coexisting prey. Evol. Ecol. 17: 393-422.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W. 2005. Habitat-dependent foraging in a classic predator-prey system: a fable from snowshoe hares. Oikos 109: 239-254
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W., Mukherjee, S. 2007. Can we measure carrying capacity with foraging behavior? Ecology 88: 597-604.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W., Lundberg, P., Ripa, J. 2001. Hamilton's rule confronts ideal free habitat selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 268: 921-924.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D.W., Diffendorfer, J.E., Lundberg, P. 2004. Dispersal among habitats varying in fitness: reciprocating migration through ideal habitat selection. Oikos 107: 559-575.
   Google Scholar
• Nathanson, M. 1975. The effect of resource limitation on competing populations of flour beetles, Tribolium spp. (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 65: 1-12.
   Google Scholar
• Palmqvist, E., Lundberg, P., Jonzen, N. 2000. Linking resource matching and dispersal. Evol. Ecol. 14: 1-12.
   Google Scholar
• Park, T. 1948. Interspecies competition in populations of Tribolium confusum Duval and Tribolium castaneum Herbst. Ecol. Monogr. 18: 265-307.
   Google Scholar
• Park, T. 1954. Experimental studies of interspecies competition. II. Temperature, humidity and competition in two species of Tribolium.Physiol. Zool. 27: 177-238.
   Google Scholar
• Park, T. 1957. Experimental studies of interspecies competition. III. Relation of initial species proportion to the competitive outcome in populations of Tribolium.Physiol. Zool. 30: 22-40.
   Google Scholar
• Pimm, S.L., Rosenzweig, M.L. 1981. Competitors and habitat use. Oikos 37: 1-6.
   Google Scholar
• Pöysä, H. 2001. Dynamics of habitat distribution in breeding mallards: assessing the applicability of current habitat selection models. Oikos 94: 365-373.
   Google Scholar
• Prus, T. 1961. The effect of homotypic and heterotypic conditioning of medium upon the net fecundity of Tribolium castaneum Herbst and Tribolium confusum Duval. Ekol. Pol. (A) 9: 245-257.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M.L. 1981. A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62: 327-335.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M.L. 1985. Some theoretical aspects of habitat selection. In: Cody, M.L., ed. Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press, New York, pp. 517-540.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M.L., Abramsky, Z. 1986. Centrifugal community organization. Oikos 46: 339-348.
   Google Scholar
• Shenbrot, G., Krasnov, B., Burdelov, S. 2006. Density-independent habitat distribution caused by density-dependent habitat selection. Evol. Ecol. Res. 8: 1277-1290.
   Google Scholar
• Shochat, E., Abramsky, Z., Pinshow, B., Whitehouse, M.E.A. 2002. Density-dependent habitat selection in migratory passerines during stopover: what causes the deviation from IFD? Evol. Ecol. 16: 469-488.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, J.A., Rose, K.A. 1997. Effects of individual habitat selection in a heterogenous environment on fish cohort survivorship: a modeling analysis. J. Anim. Ecol. 66: 122-136.
   Google Scholar
• Zeigler, J.R. 1976. Evolution of the migration response: emigration by Tribolium and the influence of age. Ecology 30: 579-592.
   Google Scholar