14
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Inferring Competitive Behavior from Population Census and Habitat Data

, &
Pages 345-359 | Published online: 14 Mar 2013

References

  • Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Subach, A. 1997. Gerbils under threat of owl predation: isoclines and isodars. Oikos 78: 81-90.
  • Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov, B.N., Csaki, F., eds. Second international symposium on information theory. Publishing House of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest. Reprinted in 1992. In: Kotz, S., Johnson, N.L., eds. Breakthroughs in statistics. Vol. 1: foundations and basic theory. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Bachman, R.A. 1984. Foraging behaviour of free-ranging and wild hatchery brown trout in a stream. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 113: 1-32.
  • Bohlin, T. 1977. Habitat selection and intercohort competition of juvenile sea-trout Salmo trutta.Oikos 29: 112-117.
  • Bult, T.P., Riley, S.C., Haedrich, R.L., Gibson, R.J., Heggenes, J. 1999. Density-dependent habitat selection by juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in experimental riverine habitats. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56: 1298-1306.
  • Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
  • Chapman, D.W. 1962. Aggressive behaviour in juvenile coho salmon as a cause of emigration. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 19: 1047-1080.
  • Danielson, B.J. 1991. Communities in a landscape: the influence of habitat heterogeneity on the interactions between species. Am. Nat. 138: 1105-1120.
  • Danielson, B.J. 1992. Habitat selection, interspecific interactions and landscape composition. Evol. Ecol. 6: 399-411.
  • de Leeuw, J. 1992. Introduction to Akaike (1973) information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Kotz, S., Johnson, N.L., eds. Breakthroughs in statistics. Vol. 1: foundations and basic theory. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Edwards, G.P., de Preu, N., Crealy, I.V., Shakeshaft, B.J. 2002. Habitat selection by feral cats and dingoes in a semi-arid woodland environment in central Australia. Austr. Ecol. 27: 26-31.
  • Fagen, R. 1987. A generalized habitat matching rule. Evol. Ecol. 1: 5-10.
  • Fagen, R. 1988. Population effects of habitat change: a quantitative assessment. J. Wild. Manage. 52: 41-46.
  • Fausch, K.D. 1984. Profitable stream positions for salmonids: relating specific growth rate to net energy gain. Can. J. Zool. 62: 441-451.
  • Fausch, K.D., White, R.J. 1981. Competition between brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) for positions in a Michigan stream. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38: 1220-1227.
  • Fernández-Juricic, E. 2001. Density-dependent habitat selection of corridors in a fragmented landscape. Ibis 143: 278-287.
  • Fretwell, S.D. 1972. Populations in a seasonal environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Fretwell, S.D., Lucas, H.L. 1970. On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor. 19: 16-36.
  • Glova, G.J., Field-Dodgson, M.S. 1995. Behavioural interaction between chinook salmon and brown trout juveniles in a simulated stream. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 124: 194-206.
  • Hansson, L. 1996. Habitat selection or habitat-dependent survival: on isodar theory for spatial dynamics of small mammals. Oikos 75: 539-542.
  • Hassell, M.P., Varley, G.C. 1969. New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control. Nature 223: 1133-1136.
  • Heggenes, J. 1988. Effect of experimentally increased intraspecific competition on sedentary adult brown trout (Salmo trutta) movement and stream habitat choice. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45: 1163-1172.
  • Hilborn, R., Mangel, M. 1997. The ecological detective: confronting models with data. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Hoar, W.S. 1942. Diurnal variations in feeding activity of young salmon and trout. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 6: 399-402.
  • Hughes, N.F. 1992a. Ranking of feedingS positions by drift-feeding Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in dominance hierarchies. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49: 1994-1998.
  • Hughes, N.F. 1992b. Selection of positions by drift-feeding salmonids in dominance hierarchies: model and test for arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in subarctic mountain streams, interior Alaska. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49: 1999-2008.
  • Hughes, N.F., Dill, L.M. 1990. Position choice by drift-feeding salmonids: model and test for arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in subarctic mountain streams, interior Alaska. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47: 2039-2048.
  • Jenkins, T.M. 1969. Social structure, position choice, and microdistribution of two trout species (Salmo trutta and Salmo gairdneri) resident in mountain streams. Anim. Behav. Monogr. 2: 55-123.
  • Johnson, J.B., Omland, K.S. 2004. Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 101-108.
  • Kalleberg, H. 1958. Observations in a stream tank of territoriality and competition in juvenile salmon and trout (Salmo salar L. and S. trutta L.). Inst. Fresh. Res. Drott. Rep. 39: 55-98.
  • Keeley, E.R., Grant, J.W.A. 1995. Allometric and environmental correlates of territory size in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52: 186-196.
  • Knight, T.W. 2000. Habitat selection in brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). Ph.D. dissertation. Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
  • Knight, T.W., Morris, D.W. 1996. How many habitats do landscapes contain? Ecology 77: 1756-1764.
  • Krasnov, B., Khokhlova, I., Shenbrot, G. 2003. Density-dependent host selection in ecotoparasites: an application of isodar theory to fleas parasitizing rodents. Oecologia 134: 365-373.
  • Lin, Y.K., Batzli, G.O. 2002. The cost of habitat selection in prairie voles: an empirical assessment using isodar analysis. Evol. Ecol. 16: 387-397.
  • Łomnicki, A. 1988. Population ecology of individuals. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • McPeek, M.A., Rodenhouse, N.L., Holmes, R.T., Sherry, T.W. 2001. A general model of sitedependent population regulation: population-level regulation without individual-level interactions. Oikos 94: 417-424.
  • Mesa, M.G., Schreck, C.B. 1989. Electrofishing mark-recapture and depletion methodologies evoke behavioural and physiological changes in cutthroat trout. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 118: 644-658.
  • Milinski, M., Parker, G.A. 1991. Competition for resources. In: Krebs, J.R., Davies, N.B., eds. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 3rd ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
  • Morris, D.W. 1987a. Tests of density-dependent habitat selection in a patchy environment. Ecol. Monogr. 57: 69-81.
  • Morris, D.W. 1987b. Spatial scale and the cost of density-dependent habitat selection. Evol. Ecol. 1: 379-388.
  • Morris, D.W. 1988. Habitat-dependent population regulation and community structure. Evol. Ecol. 2: 253-269.
  • Morris, D.W. 1989. Density-dependent habitat selection: testing the theory with fitness data. Evol. Ecol. 3: 80-94.
  • Morris, D.W. 1991. Fitness and patch selection by white-footed mice. Am. Nat. 138: 702-716.
  • Morris, D.W. 1992. Scales and costs of habitat selection in heterogeneous landscapes. Evol. Ecol. 6: 412-432.
  • Morris, D.W. 1994. Habitat matching: alternatives and implications to populations and communities. Evol. Ecol. 8: 387-406.
  • Morris, D.W. 1995. Habitat selection in mosaic landscapes. In: Hansson, L., Fahrig, L., Merriam, G., eds. Mosaic landscapes and ecological processes. Chapman and Hall, New York.
  • Morris, D.W. 1997. Optimally foraging deer mice in prairie habitat mosaics: a test of habitat theory in the absence of landscape effects. Oikos 80: 30-42.
  • Morris, D. W. 2003. Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection. Oecologia 136: 1-13.
  • Morris, D.W., Brown, J.S. 1992. The role of habitat selection in landscape ecology. Evol. Ecol. 6: 357-359.
  • Morris, D.W., Davidson, D.L., Krebs, C.J. 2000a. Measuring the ghost of competition: insights from density-dependent habitat selection on the coexistence and dynamics of lemmings. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2: 41-67.
  • Morris, D.W., Fox, B.J., Luo, J., Monamy, V. 2000b. Habitat-dependent competition and the co-existence of Australian heathland rodents. Oikos 91: 294-306.
  • Nakano, S. 1995a. Individual differences in resource use, growth and emigration under the influence of a dominance hierarchy in fluvial red-spotted masu salmon in a natural habitat. J. Anim. Ecol. 64: 75-84.
  • Nakano, S. 1995b. Competitive interactions for foraging microhabitats in a size-structured interspecific dominance hierarchy of two sympatric stream salmonids in a natural habitat. Can. J. Zool. 73: 1845-1854.
  • Newman, M.A. 1956. Social behaviour and interspecific competition in two trout species. Physiol. Zool. 29: 64-81.
  • Nicholson, A.J. 1954. An outline of the dynamics of animal populations. Aust. J. Zool. 2: 9-65.
  • Noakes, D.L.G. 1980. Social behavior in young charrs. In: Balon, E.K., ed. Charrs, salmonid fishes of the genus Salvelinus. Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.
  • Ovadia, O., Abramsky, Z. 1995. Density-dependent habitat selection: evaluation of the isodar method. Oikos 73: 86-94.
  • Parker, G.A., Sutherland, W.J. 1986. Ideal free distributions when individuals differ in competitive ability: phenotype-limited ideal free models. Anim. Behav. 34: 1222-1242.
  • Pulliam, H.R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132: 652-661.
  • Pulliam, H.R. 1996. Sources and sinks: empirical evidence and population consequences. In: Rhodes, O.E.Jr., Chesser, R.K., Smith, M.H., eds. Population dynamics in space and time. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Pulliam, H.R., Danielson, B.J. 1991. Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am. Nat. 137: S50-S66.
  • Ramp, D., Coulson, G. 2002. Density dependence in foraging habitat preference of eastern grey kangaroos. Oikos 98: 393-402.
  • Rodenhouse, N.L., Sherry, T.W., Holmes, R.T. 1997. Site-dependent regulation of population size: a new synthesis. Ecology 78: 2025-2042.
  • Rodríguez, M.A. 1995. Habitat-specific estimates of competition in stream salmonids: a field test of the isodar model of habitat selection. Evol. Ecol. 9: 169-184.
  • Rosenzweig, M.L. 1991. Habitat selection and population interactions: the search for mechanism. Am. Nat. 137: S5-S28.
  • Rosenzweig, M.L., Abramsky, Z. 1985. Detecting density-dependent habitat selection. Am. Nat. 126: 405-417.
  • Sakamoto, Y., Ishiguro, M., Kitagawa, G. 1986. Akaike information criterion statistics. KTK Scientific Publishers, Tokyo.
  • Shochat, E., Abramsky, Z., Pinshow, B. 2002. Density-dependent habitat selection in migratory passerines during stopover: what causes the deviation from IFD? Evol. Ecol. 16: 469-488.
  • Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd ed. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
  • Sutherland, W.J. 1983. Aggregation and the ‘ideal free’ distribution. J. Anim. Ecol. 52: 821-828.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.