Distribution of threatened-unprotected vertebrates as a basis for conservation planning

References

• Benayas, J. M. R., de la Montana, E. 2003. Identifying areas of high-value vertebrate diversity for strengthening conservation. Biological Conservation 114: 357-370.
   Google Scholar
• Bonn, A., Gaston, K. J. 2005. Capturing biodiversity: selecting priority areas for conservation using different criteria. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 1083-1100.
   Google Scholar
• Bonn, A., Rodriguez, A., Gaston, K. J. 2002. Threatened and endemic species: are they good indicators of patterns of biodiversity on a national scale? Ecology Letters 5: 733-741.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, N., Kuper, W., Mutke, J., Brown, J., Westaway, S., Turpie, S., Meshack, C., Taplin, J., McClean, C., Lovett, J. C. 2005. Major gaps in the distribution of protected areas for threatened and narrow range Afrotropical plants. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 1877-1894.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, N. D., Hales, J. D., Ricketts, T. H., Dinerstein, E. 2006. Factoring species, non-species values and threats into biodiversity prioritisation across the ecoregions of Africa and its islands. Biological Conservation 127: 383-401.
   Google Scholar
• Cantu, C., Wright, R. G., Scott, J. M., Strand, E. 2004. Assessment of current and proposed nature reserves of Mexico based on their capacity to protect geophysical features and biodiversity. Biological Conservation 115: 411-417.
   Google Scholar
• Carmel, Y., Stoller-Cavari, L. 2006. Comparing environmental and biological surrogates for biodiversity at a local scale. Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution 52: 11-27.
   Google Scholar
• Cowling, R. M., Pressey, R. L., Lombard, A. T., Desmet, P. G., Ellis, A. G. 1999. From representation to persistence: requirements for a sustainable system of conservation areas in the species-rich mediterranean-climate desert of southern Africa. Diversity and Distributions 5: 51-71.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. W., Stoms, D. M., Hollander, A. D., Thomas, K. A., Stine, P. A., Odion, D., Borchert, M. I., Thorne, J. H., Gray, M. V., Walker, R. E., Warner, K., Graae, J. 1998. The California GAP Analysis Project-final report. University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Deguise, I. E., Kerr, J. T. 2006. Protected areas and prospects for endangered species conservation in Canada. Conservation Biology 20: 48-55.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, R. W., Czech, B. 2005. Conservation deficits for the continental United States: an ecosystem GAP analysis. Conservation Biology 19: 1478-1487.
   Google Scholar
• Dolev, A., Perevolotsky, A. 2004. The Red Book of vertebrates in Israel. Israel Nature and Parks Authority and the Society for Protection of Nature in Israel, Jerusalem, Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Eken, G., Bennun, L., Brooks, T. M., Darwall, W., Fishpool, L. D. C., Foster, M., Knox, D., Langhammer, P., Matiku, P., Radford, E., Salaman, P., Sechrest, W., Smith, M. L., Spector, S., Tordoff, A. 2004. Key biodiversity areas as site conservation targets. Bioscience 54: 1110-1118.
   Google Scholar
• ESRI. 2001. ArcGIS users guide. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California.
   Google Scholar
• Faith, D. P., Carter, G., Cassis, G., Ferrier, S., Wilkie, L. 2003. Complementarity, biodiversity viability analysis, and policy-based algorithms for conservation. Environmental Science & Policy 6: 311-328.
   Google Scholar
• Faith, D. P., Reid, C. A. M., Hunter, J. 2004. Integrating phylogenetic diversity, complementarity, and endemism for conservation assessment. Conservation Biology 18: 255-261.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrier, S. 2002. Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: where to from here? Systematic Biology 51: 331-363.
   Google Scholar
• Fleishman, E., Noss, R. F., Noon, B. R. 2006. Utility and limitations of species richness metrics for conservation planning. Ecological Indicators 6: 543-553.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, C., Fleming, P. 1995. An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multiobjective optimization. Evolutionary Computation 3: 1-16.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2001. IUCN Red List categories and criteria version 3.1. World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, M. D. 2000. GAP analysis: concepts, methods, and recent results. Landscape Ecology 15: 5-20.
   Google Scholar
• Kintisch, E. 2005. Israeli controversy blossoms over protecting Gilboa iris. Science 308: 1251.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, J. B., Brown, M. J. 1994. A comparison of direct and environmental domain approaches to planning reservation of forest higher-plant communities and species in Tasmania. Conservation Biology 8: 217-224.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, N., Shmida, A. 2007. Determining conservation hotspots across biogeographic regions using rainfall belts: Israel as a case study. Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution 53: 33-58.
   Google Scholar
• Lombard, A. T., Cowling, R. M., Pressey, R. L., Rebelo, A. G. 2003. Effectiveness of land classes as surrogates for species in conservation planning for the Cape Floristic Region. Biological Conservation 112: 45-62.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelik, Y., Dayan, T., Feitelson, E. 2005. Planning for biodiversity: the role of ecological impact assessment. Conservation Biology 19: 1254-1261.
   Google Scholar
• Margules, C. R., Pressey, R. L. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405: 243-253.
   Google Scholar
• Moilanen, A. 2005. Reserve selection using nonlinear species distribution models. American Naturalist 165: 695-706.
   Google Scholar
• Moilanen, A. 2008. Generalized complementarity and mapping of the concepts of systematic conservation planning. Conservation Biology 22: 1655-1658.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. L., Balmford, A., Brooks, T., Burgess, N. D., Hansen, L. A., Rahbek, C., Williams, P. H. 2003. Performance of sub-Saharan vertebrates as indicator groups for identifying priority areas for conservation. Conservation Biology 17: 207-218.
   Google Scholar
• Orme, C. D. L., Davies, R. G., Burgess, M., Eigenbrod, F., Pickup, N., Olson, V. A., Webster, A. J., Ding, T.-S., Rasmussen, P. C., Ridgely, R. S., Stattersfield, A. J., Bennett, P. M., Blackburn, T. M., Gaston, K. J., Owens, I. P. F. 2005. Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436: 1016-1019.
   Google Scholar
• Rebelo, A. G., Tansley, S. A. 1993. Using rare plant-species to identify priority conservation areas in the Cape Floristic region—the need to standardize for total species richness. South African Journal of Science 89: 156-161.
   Google Scholar
• Reyers, B., Wessels, K. J., van Jaarsveld, A. S. 2002. An assessment of biodiversity surrogacy options in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. African Zoology 37: 185-195.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, A. S. L., Andelman, S. J., Bakarr, M. I., Boitani, L., Brooks, T. M., Cowling, R. M., Fishpool, L. D. C., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Gaston, K. J., Hoffmann, M., Long, J. S., Marquet, P. A., Pilgrim, J. D., Pressey, R. L., Schipper, J., Sechrest, W., Stuart, S. N., Underhill, L. G., Waller, R. W., Watts, M. E. J., Yan, X. 2004. Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428: 640-643.
   Google Scholar
• Sarakinos, H., Nicholls, A. O., Tubert, A., Aggarwal, A., Margules, C. R., Sarkar, S. 2001. Area prioritization for biodiversity conservation in Quebec on the basis of species distributions: a preliminary analysis. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 1419-1472.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M. J., David, F., Csuti, B., Noss, R., Butterfield, B., Caicco, S., Groves, C., Edwards, T. C., Ulliman, J., Anderson, H., D'Erichia, F., Wright, R. G. 1993. GAP analysis: a geographic apprach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monographs 123: 1-41.
   Google Scholar
• Shriner, S. A., Wilson, K. R., Flather, C. H. 2006. Reserve networks based on richness hotspots and representation vary with scale. Ecological Applications 16: 1660-1673.
   Google Scholar
• Solymos, P., Feher, Z. 2005. Conservation prioritization based on distribution of land snails in Hungary. Conservation Biology 19: 1084-1094.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, R. R., Noyce, T., Possingham, H. P. 2003. Opportunity cost of ad hoc marine reserve design decisions: an example from South Australia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 253: 25-38.
   Google Scholar
• Tognelli, M. F., de Arellano, P. I. R., Marquet, P. A. 2008. How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile? Diversity and Distributions 14: 148-158.
   Google Scholar
• Trakhtenbrot, A., Kadmon, R. 2005. Environmental cluster analysis as a tool for selecting complementary networks of conservation sites. Ecological Applications 15: 335-345.
   Google Scholar
• Wiersma, Y. F., Urban, D. L. 2005. Beta diversity and nature reserve system design in the Yukon, Canada. Conservation Biology 19: 1262-1272.
   Google Scholar