Statistical Inference and Decision Making in Conservation Biology

References

• Anderson, D. R. 2008. Model based inference in life sciences. Springer, NY, 184 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Berkson, J. 1942. Tests of significance considered as evidence. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 37: 325-335.
   Google Scholar
• Brosi, B. J., Biber, E. G. 2009. Statistical inference, Type II error, and decision making under the U. S. Endangered Species Act. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 7: 487-494.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R. 2001. Kullback-Leibler information as a basis for strong inference in ecological studies. Wildl. Res. 28: 111-119.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R. 2002. Model selection and multi-model inference. 2nd edition. Springer, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Feisinger, P. 2001. Designing field studies for biodiversity and conservation. Island Press, Washington, DC. 217 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. A. 1925. Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. A. 1955. Statistical methods and scientific induction. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 17: 69-78.
   Google Scholar
• Hoenig, J. M., Heisey, D. M. 2001. The abuse of power: the pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. Am. Stat. 55: 19-24.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, R., Armstrong, J. S. 2006. Why we don't really know what statistical significance means: implications for educators. Journal of Marketing Education 28: 114-120.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., Omland, K. S. 2004. Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 101-108.
   Google Scholar
• Kadane, J. B., Lazar, N. A. 2004. Methods and criteria for model selection. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 99: 279-290.
   Google Scholar
• Kullback, S., Leibler, R. A. 1951. On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Stat. 22: 79-86.
   Google Scholar
• Lukacs, P. M., Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R. 2010. Model selection bias and Freedmand's paradox. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 62: 117-125.
   Google Scholar
• McGarvey, D. J. 2007. Merging precaution with sound science under the Endangered Species Act. BioScience 57: 65-70.
   Google Scholar
• Neyman, J., Pearson, E. S. 1933. On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypothesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A 231: 289-337.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, J. R. 1964. Strong inference. Science 146: 347-353.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. Harper & Row, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, S. A., Whittingham, M. J., Stephens, P. A. 2011. Model selection and model averaging in behavioural ecology: the utility of the IT-AIC framework. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65: 77-89.
   Google Scholar
• Romesburg, H. C. 1981. Wildlife science: gaining reliable knowledge. J. Wildl. Manage. 45: 293-313.
   Google Scholar
• Royall, R. M. 1999. Statistical evidence. Chapman & Hall/CRC, NY. 191 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, T. R., Burnham, K. P. 1998. Information-theoretic model selection and model averaging for closed-population capture—recapture studies. Biom. J. 40: 475-494.
   Google Scholar
• Symonds, M. R. E., Moussalli, A. 2011. A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike's information criterion. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65: 13-21.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L. 1997. Retrospective power analysis. Conserv. Biol. 11: 276-280.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, P. R. 2000. Bayesian methods in conservation biology. Conserv. Biol. 14: 1308-1316.
   Google Scholar