A plant's view of cheating in plant–pollinator mutualisms

References

• Ackerman, J. D. 1986. Mechanisms and evolution of food-deceptive pollination systems in orchids. Lindleyana 1: 108-113.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman, J. D. 2000. Abiotic pollen and pollination: ecological, functional, and evolutionary perspectives. Plant Systematics and Evolution 222: 167-185.
   Google Scholar
• Althoff, D. M., Segraves, K. A., Sparks J. P. 2004. Characterizing the interaction between the bogus yucca moth and yuccas: do bogus yucca moths impact yucca reproductive success? Oecologia 140: 321-327.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2: 349-368.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, R. M., Hollingsworth, P. M., Preston, J., Yi-Bo, L., Pridgeon, A. M., Chase, M. W. 2003. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution of Orchidinae and selected Habenariinae (Orchidaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 142: 1-40.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, G. 1986. The evolution of empty flowers. Journal of Theoretical Biology 118: 253-258.
   Google Scholar
• Box, M., Bateman, R. M., Glover, B. J., Rudall, P. 2008. Floral ontogenetic evidence of repeated speciation via paedomorphosis in subtribe Orchidinae (Orchidaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 157: 429-454.
   Google Scholar
• Bronstein, J. L. 2001. The exploitation of mutualisms. Ecology Letters 4: 277-287.
   Google Scholar
• Bytebier, B., Bellstedt, D. U., Linder, H. P. 2007. A molecular phylogeny for the large African orchid genus Disa. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43: 75-90.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J. M., Rasplus, J. Y. 2003. Mutualists with attitude: coevolving fig wasps and figs. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 241-248.
   Google Scholar
• Cozzolino, S., Widmer, A. 2005. Orchid diversity: an evolutionary consequence of deception? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 487-494.
   Google Scholar
• Cozzolino, S., Aceto, S., Caputo, P., Widmer, A., Dafni, A. 2001. Speciation processes in Eastern Mediterranean Orchis s.l. species: molecular evidence and the role of pollination biology. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 49: 91-103.
   Google Scholar
• Dafni, A. 1984. Mimicry and deception in pollination. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 15: 259-278.
   Google Scholar
• Dafni, A. 1986. Floral mimicry—mutualism and unidirectional exploitation of insects by plants. In: Southwood, T. R. F., Juniper, B. E., eds. Plant surface and insects. Arnold, London, pp 86-94.
   Google Scholar
• Dafni, A. 1987. Pollination in Orchis and related genera: evolution from reward to deception. In: Arditti, J., ed. Orchid biology: reviews and perspectives VI. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp 79-104.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. R. 1862. On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilized by insects, and on the good effects of intercrossing. John Murray, London.
   Google Scholar
• Dedej, S., Delaplane, K. 2005. Net energetic advantage drives honey bees (Apis mellifera L) to nectar larceny in Vaccinium ashei Reade. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 57: 398-403.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz, A., Kite, G. C. 2006. Why be a rewarding trap? The evolution of floral rewards in Arum (Araceae), a genus characterized by saprophilous pollination systems. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 88: 257-268.
   Google Scholar
• Dilcher, D. 2000. Towards a new synthesis: major evolutionary trends in the angiosperm fossil record. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 97: 7030-7036.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, M. E., Silvertown, J., Chase, M. W. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of trait evolution and species diversity variation among angiosperm families. Evolution 53: 732-744.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, K. J., Scopece, G., Cozzolino, S., Fay, M. F., Smith, R. J., Stout, J. C. 2009. Ecology and genetic diversity of the dense-flowered orchid Neotinea maculata, at the centre and edge of its range. Annals of Botany 104: 507-516.
   Google Scholar
• Ferdy, J. B., Smithson, A. 2002. Bumblebee behaviour and selfing rates in unrewarding inflorescences. Evolutionary Ecology 16: 155-175.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, A. L., Nilsson, L. A. 1996. Reproductive success and gender variation in deceit-pollinated orchids. In: Lloyd, D. G., Barrett, S. C. H., eds. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 319-338.
   Google Scholar
• Gandolfo, M. A., Nixon, K. C., Crepet, W. L. 2004. Cretaceous flowers of Nymphaeaceae and implications for complex insect entrapment pollination mechanisms in early Angiosperms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101: 8056-8060.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, D. E. 1989. Fruiting failure, pollinator inefficiency, and speciation in orchids. In: Otte, D., Endler, J. A., eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp. 458-481.
   Google Scholar
• Golubov, J., Eguiarte, L. E., Mandujano, M. C., Lopez-Portillo, J., Montana, C. 1999. Why be a honeyless honey mesquite? Reproduction and mating system of nectarful and nectarless individuals. American Journal of Botany 86: 955-963.
   Google Scholar
• Gravendeel, B., Smithson, A., Slik, F., Schuiteman, A. 2004. Epiphytism and pollinator specialization—drivers for orchid diversity? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 359: 1523-1535.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, S. D., Brown, A. P. 2001. Contributions to Western Australian orchidology: 2. New taxa and circumscriptions in Caladenia (spider, fairy and dragon orchids of Western Australia). Nuytsia 14: 27-314.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, S., Dilcher, D. L., Jarzen, D. M., Taylor, D. W. 2008. Early steps of angiosperm-pollinator coevolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105: 240-245.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, R. E. 2003. Impact of nectar robbing on estimates of pollen flow: conceptual predictions and empirical outcomes. Ecology 84: 485-495.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, R. E., Maloof, J. E. 2002. Variation in nectar robbing over time, space, and species. Oecologia 133: 525-533.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, R. E., Brody, A. K., Waser, N. M. 2001. The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations, and communities. Oecologia 129: 161-168.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquemyn, H., Brys, R., Hermy, M., Willems, J. H. 2005. Does nectar reward affect rarity and extinction probabilities of orchid species? An assessment using historical records from Belgium and the Netherlands. Biological Conservation 121: 257-263.
   Google Scholar
• Jersáková, J., Johnson, S. D. 2006. Lack of floral nectar reduces self-pollination in a fly-pollinated orchid. Oecologia 147: 60-68.
   Google Scholar
• Jersáková, J., Johnson, S. D., Kindlemann, P. 2006. Mechanisms and evolution of deception pollination in orchids. Biological Reviews 81: 219-235.
   Google Scholar
• Jersáková, J., Johnson, S. D., Kindlemann, P., Pupin, A. C. 2008. Effect of nectar supplementation on male and female components of pollination success in the deceptive orchid Dactylorhiza sambucina. Acta Oecologia 33: 300-306.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. D. Nilsson, L. A. 1999. Pollen carryover, geitonogamy, and the evolution of deceptive pollination systems in orchids. Ecology 80: 2607-2619.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. D., Linder, H. P., Steiner, K. E. 1998. Phylogeny and radiation of pollination systems in Disa (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 402-411.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. D., Peter, C. I., Ågren, J. 2004. The effects of nectar addition on pollen removal and geitonogamy in the non-rewarding orchid Anacamptis morio. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271: 803-809.
   Google Scholar
• Kores, P. J., Molvray, M., Weston, P. H., Hopper, S. D., Brown, A. P., Cameron, K. M., Chase, M. W. 2001. A phylogenetic analysis of Diurideae (Orchidaceae) based on plastid DNA sequence data. American Journal of Botany 88: 1903-1914.
   Google Scholar
• Kropf, M., Renner, S. 2008. Pollinator-mediated selfing in two deceptive orchids and a review of pollinium tracking studies addressing geitonogamy. Oecologia 155: 497-508.
   Google Scholar
• Lasso, E., Naranjo, M. E. 2003. Effect of pollinators and nectar robbers on nectar production and pollen deposition in Hamelia patens (Rubiaceae). Biotropica 35: 57-66.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. Y., Baum, S. F., Oh, S. H., Jiang, C. Z., Chen, J. C., Bowman, J. L. 2005. Recruitment of CRABS CLAW to promote nectary development within the eudicot clade. Development 132: 5021-5032.
   Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. 1983. A review of floral food deception mimicries with comments on floral mutualism. In: Jones, C. E., Little, R. J., eds. Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 294-309.
   Google Scholar
• Maddison, W. P., Maddison, D. R. 2008. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.5. http://mesquiteproject.org
   Google Scholar
• Maddison, W. P., Midford, P. E., Otto, S. P. 2007. Estimating a binary character's effect on speciation and extinction. Systematic Biology 56: 701-710.
   Google Scholar
• Midford, P., Maddison, W. P. 2008. Diverse package for Mesquite. Version 2.5. http://mesquiteproject.org
   Google Scholar
• Neiland, M. R. M., Wilcock, C. C. 1998. Fruit set, nectar reward, and rarity in the Orchidaceae. American Journal of Botany 85: 1657-1671.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D. A., Thomson, J. D. 2005. Effects of nectar robbing on nectar dynamics and bumblebee foraging strategies in Linaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae). Oikos 110: 309-320.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, L. A. 1992. Orchid pollination biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7: 255-259.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, L. A., Rabakonandrianina, E., Pettersson, B. 1992. Exact tracking of pollen transfer and mating in plants. Nature 360: 666-667.
   Google Scholar
• Otero, J. T., Flanagan, N. S. 2006. Orchid diversity—beyond deception. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 64-65.
   Google Scholar
• Pellmyr, O., Leebens-Mack, J. 2000. Reversal of mutualism as a mechanism for adaptive radiation in yucca moths. American Naturalist 156: S62-S76.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, R. D., Brown, A. P., Dixon, K. W., Hopper, S. D. 2009. Orchid biogeography and factors associated with rarity in a biodiversity hotspot: the Southwest Australian Floristic Region. Journal of Biogeography. Submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Pridgeon, A. M., Cribb, P. J., Chase, M. W., Rasmussen, F. N. 2001. Genera Orchidacearum. Vol. 2, Orchidoideae (Part 1). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Renner, S. S. 2005. Rewardless flowers in the angiosperms and the role of insect cognition in their evolution. In: Waser, N. W., Ollerton, J., eds. Specialization and generalization in plant-pollinator interactions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 123-144.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, S. C. 2004a. Are nectar-robbers mutualists or antagonists? Oecologia 139: 246-254.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, S. C. 2004b. Benefits and costs of floral visitors to Chilopsis linearis: pollen deposition and stigma closure. Oikos 107: 363-375.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, B. A., Widmer, A. 1999. Floral mimicry: a fascinating yet poorly understood phenomenon. Trends in Plant Sciences 4: 325-330.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. L., Simms, E. L. 2006. Pathways to mutualism breakdown. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 585-592.
   Google Scholar
• Sakai, S. 2002. Aristolochia spp. (Aristolochiaceae) pollinated by flies breeding on decomposing flowers in Panama. American Journal of Botany 89: 527-534.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, B. J., Danka, R. G., Stringer, S. J. 2004. Nectar robbery by bees Xylocopa virginica and Apis mellifera contributes to the pollination of rabbiteye blueberry. Journal of Economic Entomology 97: 735-740.
   Google Scholar
• Schemske, D. W., Bradshaw, H. D. 1999. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 96: 11910-11915.
   Google Scholar
• Schiestl, F. P. 2005. On the success of a swindle: pollination by deception in orchids. Naturwissenschaften 92: 255-264.
   Google Scholar
• Schiestl, F. P., Cozzolino, S. 2008. Evolution of sexual mimicry in the orchid subtribe Orchidinae: the role of preadaptations in the attraction of male bees as pollinators. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 27.
   Google Scholar
• Schiestl, F. P., Peakall, R., Mant, J. G., Ibarra, F., Schulz, C., Franke, S., Francke, W. 2003. The chemistry of sexual deception in an orchid-wasp pollination system. Science 302: 437-438.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, A. 2002. The evolution of rewardlessness in orchids: reward supplementation experiments with Anacamptis morio. American Journal of Botany 89: 1579-1587.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, A. 2006. Pollinator limitation and inbreeding depression in orchid species with and without nectar rewards. New Phytologist 169: 419-430.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, A., Gigord, L. D. B. 2001. Are there advantages in being a rewardless orchid? Reward supplementation experiments with Barlia robertiana. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268: 1-7.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, A., Gigord, L. D. B. 2003. The evolution of empty flowers revisited. American Naturalist 161: 537-552.
   Google Scholar
• Sprengel, C. K. 1793. Das entdeckte Geheimnis der Natur im Bau und in der Befruchtung der Blumen. Friedrich Vieweg dem aeltern, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, R. L., Ackerman, J. D., Zimmerman, J. K., Calvo, R. N. 2005. Variation in sexual reproduction in orchids and its evolutionary consequences: a spasmodic journey to diversification. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84: 1-54.
   Google Scholar
• van der Cingel, N. A. 1995. An atlas of orchid pollination—European orchids. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• van der Cingel, N. A. 2000. An atlas of orchid pollination: America, Africa, Asia, and Australia. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• van der Pijl, L., Dodson, C. H. 1966. Orchid flowers: their pollination and evolution. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, Florida.
   Google Scholar