42
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

PREDATOR AND PREY HABITAT SELECTION GAMES: THE EFFECTS OF HOW PREY BALANCE FORAGING AND PREDATION RISK

&
Pages 233-254 | Published online: 14 Mar 2013

References

  • Abrams, P.A., Ginzburg, L.R. 2000. The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 337-341.
  • Alonzo, S.H. 2002. State-dependent habitat selection games between predators and prey: the importance of behavioural interactions and expected lifetime reproductive success. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4: 759-778.
  • Anderrson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Ludwig, D., Rowe, L. 1990. Life history strategies for energy gain and predator avoidance under time constraints. Am. Nat. 135: 686-707.
  • Mitchell, M. 1996. An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Murdoch, W.W., Steward-Oaten, A. 1989. Aggregation by parasitoids and predators: effects on equilibrium and stability. Am. Nat. 134: 288-310.
  • Sih, A. 1984. The behavioral response race between predator and prey. Am. Nat. 123: 143-150.
  • Sih, A. 1998. Game theory and predator-prey response races. In: Game theory and animal behavior. Dugatkin, L.A., Reeve, H.K., eds. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 221-238. Skalski, G.T., Gilliam, J.F. 2002. Feeding under predation hazard: testing models of adaptive behavior with stream fish. Am. Nat. 160: 158-172.
  • Stephens, D.W., Krebs, J.R. 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Sumida, B.H., Houston, A.I., McNamara, J.M., Hamilton, W.D. 1990. Genetic algorithms and evolution. J. Theor. Biol. 147: 59-84.
  • van Baalen, M., Sabelis, M.W. 1999. Nonequilibrium population dynamics of "ideal and free" prey and predators. Am. Nat. 154: 69-88.
  • Bouskila, A. 2001. A habitat selection game of interactions between rodents and their predators. Ann. Zool. Fennici. 38: 55-70.
  • Bouskila, A., Robinson, M.E., Roitberg, B.D., Tenhumberg, B. 1998. Life-history decisions under predation risk: importance of a game perspective. Evol. Ecol. 12: 701-715.
  • Clark, C.W. 1994. Antipredator behavior and the asset-protection principle. Behav. Ecol. 5: 159- 170.
  • Clark, C.W., Mangel, M. 2000. Dynamic state variable models in ecology. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Fretwell, S.D., Lucas, H.L. 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor. 19: 16-36.
  • Formanowicz, D.R., Bobka, M.S. 1989. Predation risk and microhabitat preference: an experimental study of the behavioral responses of prey and predator. Am. Midl. Nat. 121: 379-386.
  • Gilliam, J.F., Fraser, D.F. 1987. Habitat selection under predation hazard: a test of a model with foraging minnows. Ecology 68: 1856-1862.
  • Goldberg, D.E. 1989. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
  • Heithaus, M.R. 2001. Habitat selection by predators and prey in communities with asymmetrical intraguild predation. Oikos 92: 542-554.
  • Holland, J.H. 1975. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Houston, A.I., McNamara, J.M. 1999. Models of adaptive behaviour: an approach based on state. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Hugie, D.M., Dill, L.M. 1994. Fish and game: a game theoretical approach to habitat selection by predators and prey. J. Fish Biol. 45: 151-169.
  • Krivan, V. 1997. Dynamic ideal free distribution: effects of optimal patch choice on predator-prey dynamics. Am. Nat. 149: 164-178.
  • Lima, S.L. 1998. Stress and decision-making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive and ecological perspectives. Adv. Stud. Behav. 27: 215-290.
  • Lima, S.L. 2002. Putting predators back into behavioral predator-prey interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 70-75.
  • Lima, S.L., Dill, L.M. 1990. Behavioural decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.