Detection and Acceptance of Demand-Responsive Lighting in Offices with and without Daylight

References

• ADM Associates. 2007. Demand Response Technology Evaluation Mackenzie Laboratories. Southern California Edison Report. Available on request from Doug Avery.
   Google Scholar
• Akashi Y, Neches J. 2005. Potential recommendations for illuminance reductions by load shedding. Lighting Res Tech, 37 (2): 133–153.
   Google Scholar
• Akashi Y, Neches J. 2004. Detectability and acceptability of illuminance redcution for load shedding. J Illum Eng Soc. 33: 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Joutey H Amrani, Vaezi-Nejad H, Clemencon B, Rosenstein F. 2006. Anticipated solutions to reduce electricity demand during peak period. Proceedings of EPIC conference (Lyon). 2: 419–424.
   Google Scholar
• [ASHRAE] American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. 2004. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta (USA). ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55–2004.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell R. 2006. Shooting the breeze. Globe & Mail, Monday October 30th: B1, B15. See also URL: http://www.ieso.ca/imoweb/pubs/marketreports/OPA-Report-200610-1.pdf. (accessed 2007-08-15).
   Google Scholar
• Boyce PR. 1984. Lighting control: the user's point of view. Proceedings of the CEA/DBR Symposium, Ottawa (Canada): 69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce PR, Veitch JA, Newsham GR, Jones CC, Heerwagen J, Myer M, Hunter CM. 2006. Lighting quality and office work: two field simulation experiments. Lighting Res Tech. 38 (3): 191–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [DRCC]. 2006. United States Demand Response Coordinating Committee.URL: http://www.demandresponseinfo.org/. (accessed 2006-07-28).
   Google Scholar
• [IEA] International Energy Agency. 2006. Light's labour's lost: Policies for energy-efficient lighting. Paris (France).
   Google Scholar
• [IESNA] Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. 2000. Lighting handbook: reference and application. 9th ed. New York (USA).
   Google Scholar
• Kelly DH. 1961. Visual responses to time-dependent stimuli. I. Amplitude and sensitivity measurements. J Optical Soc Am. 51 (4): 422–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiliccote S, Piette MA, Watson DS, Hughes G. 2006. Dynamic controls for energy efficiency and demand response: framework concepts and a new construction study case in New York. Proceedings of ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings (Pacific Grove, CA): 3.172–3.183. URL: http://drrc.lbl.gov/pubs/60615.pdf (accessed 2007-08-15).
   Google Scholar
• Kryszczuk KM, Boyce PR. 2002. Detection of slow light level reduction. J Illum Eng Soc. 31 (2): 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Newsham GR, Mancini S. 2006. The Potential for demand responsive lighting in non-daylit offices. Leukos, 3 (2): 105–120. URL: http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/pubs/fulltext/nrcc48678/ (accessed 2007-08-15).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsham GR, Donnelly C, Mancini S, Marchand R, Lei W, Charles K, Veitch J. 2006. The effect of ramps in temperature and electric light level on office occupants: a literature review and a laboratory experiment. Proceedings of the ACEEE Summer Study (Asilomar, USA). URL: http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/ie/lighting/office/demand e.html. (accessed 2007-08-15).
   Google Scholar
• Pearson A. 2006. The cool way to save energy. Building Serv J. 28 (2): 11.
   Google Scholar
• Piette MA, Watson DS, Motegi N, Bourassa N. 2005. Findings from the 2004 fully automated demand response tests in large facilities. Report for the PIER Demand Response Research Center. LBNL Report Number 58178.URL: http://drrc.lbl.gov/pubs/58178.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig MB, Fraser H, Falk J, Voll SP. 2003. Market power and demand responsiveness: letting customers protect themselves. Electr J. 16 (4): 11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands IH. 2005. Ontario demand response scenarios. CANMET Energy Technology Centre – Varennes, Natural Resources Canada. CETC 2005–139.
   Google Scholar
• URL: http://cetc-varennes.nrcan.gc.ca/fichier.php/codectec/En/2005-139/2005-139e.pdf (accessed 2007-08-15).
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein F; Kiliccote S. 2007. Demand Responsive Lighting: A Scoping Study. LBNL/DRRC Report LBNL-62226. URL: http://drrc.lbl.gov/pubs/62226.pdf (accessed 2007-08-15).
   Google Scholar
• SCE. 2005a. Demand Response Technology Evaluation LA County Internal Services Division (ISD). Southern California Edison Report. Available on request from Doug Avery.
   Google Scholar
• SCE. 2005b. Demand Response Technology Evaluation Ganahl Lumber. Southern California Edison Report. Available on request from Doug Avery.
   Google Scholar
• Shikakura T, Morikawa H, Nakamura Y. 2003. Perception of lighting fluctuation in office lighting environment. J Light Visual Envirn. 27 (2): 75–82.
   Google Scholar
• Tenner AD, Begemann SHA, van den Beld GJ. 1997. Acceptance and preference of illuminance in offices. Lux Europa'97, Proceedings of the 8th European Lighting Conference, Amsterdam (The Netherlands). 131–143.
   Google Scholar