Counterbalancing Needed to Avoid Bias in Side-By-Side Brightness Matching Tasks

References

• Alman DH. 1977 October. Errors of the standard photometric system when measuring the brightness of general illumination light sources. J Illum Eng Soc. 7 (1): 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Alman DH, Breton ME, Barbour J. 1983. New results on the brightness matching of heterochromatic stimuli. J Illum Eng Soc. 12 (4): 268–274.
   Google Scholar
• Aston SM, Bellchambers HE. 1969. Illumination, colour rendering and visual clarity. Light Res Technol. 1 (4): 259–261.
   Google Scholar
• Bellchambers HE, Godby AC. 1972. Illumination, colour rendering and visual clarity. Light Res Technol. 4 (2): 104–106.
   Google Scholar
• Booker RL. 1978. Luminance-brightness comparisons of LED alpha-numeric sources at suprathreshold levels. J Opt Soc Am. 68 (7): 949–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce PR. 1977. Investigations of the subjective balance between illuminance and lamp colour properties. Light Res Technol. 9: 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• CIE. 1978. Light as a true visual quantity: principals of measurement. Paris: Commission Internationale De L'Éclairage.
   Google Scholar
• Field A. 2005. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fotios SA. 2001a. Lamp colour properties and apparent brightness: a review. Light Res Technol. 33 (3): 163–181.
   Google Scholar
• Fotios SA. 2001b. An error in brightness matching associated with the application of dimming. Light Res Technol. 33 (4): 223–231.
   Google Scholar
• Fotios SA, Cheal C. 2007a. Lighting in subsidiary streets: investigation of SPD effects. Part 2 – Brightness. Light Res Technol. 39 (3): 233–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios SA, Cheal C. 2007b. Evidence For Response Contraction Bias In Side-By-Side Matching Tasks. Light Res Technol. 39 (2): 159–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Gado T. 2005. A comparison of visual objectives used in side-by-side matching tests. Light Res Technol. 37 (2): 117–131.
   Google Scholar
• Fotios SA, Levermore GJ. 1997. The Perception Of Electric Light Sources Of Different Colour Properties. Light Res Technol. 29 (3): 161–171.
   Google Scholar
• Fotios SA, Levermore GJ. 1995. Visual perception under tungsten lamps with enhanced blue spectrum. Light Res Technol. 27 (4): 173–179.
   Google Scholar
• Gescheider GA. 1997. Psychophysics: The fundamentals. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington RE. 1954. Effect of color temperature on apparent brightness. J Opt Soc Am. 44 (2): 113–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto K, Nayatani Y. 1994. Visual clarity and feeling of contrast. Color Res App. 19 (3): 171–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houser KW, Tiller DK, Hu X. 2003. Prototype demonstration of vision-tuned fluorescent lamps. Final report for California Energy Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Houser KW, Hu X. 2004. Visually matching daylight fluorescent lamplight with two primary sets. Color Res App. 29 (6): 428–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Houser KW, Tiller DK. 2006. Higher color temperature lamps may not appear brighter. Leukos 3 (1): 69–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt RWG. 1995. Measuring Colour. London: Ellis Horwood.
   Google Scholar
• Jou J, Leka GE, Rogers DM, Matus YE. 2004. Contraction bias in memorial quantifying judgment: Does it come from a stable compressed memory representation or a dynamic adaptation process? Am J Psychol. 117 (4): 543–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinney JAS. 1955. Sensitivity of the eye to spectral radiation at scotopic and mesopic intensity levels. J Opt Soc Am. 45 (7): 507–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBoeuf RA, Shafir E. 2006. The long and the short of it: Physical anchoring effects. J Behav Decis Mak. 19: 393–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemons TM, Robinson AV. 1976. Does visual clarity have meaning for IES illuminance recommendations for task lighting? Lighting Des App. 6 (11): 24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Levermore GJ. 1994. Perception of lighting and brightness from HID light sources. Light Res Technol. 26 (3): 145–150.
   Google Scholar
• Pereverzeva M, Teller DY. Centering biases in heterochromatic brightness matching. Vision Res. 200; 45(25–26):3290–33005.
   Google Scholar
• Poulton EC. 1989. Bias in quantifying judgements. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Poulton EC. 1977. Quantitative subjective assessments are almost always biased, sometimes completely misleading. Brit J Psychol. 68: 409–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randhawa HS. 1997. Visual characteristics of light sources for residential road lighting. Visual Scales: Photometric & Colorimetric aspects. NPL - CIE-UK Conference, March 1997. pp. 65–68.
   Google Scholar
• Ray S. 1989. The evaluation of a daylight tungsten lamp for task lighting. Under-graduate student research project, Department of Human Sciences, Loughborough University
   Google Scholar
• Teller DY, Pereverzeva M, Civan AL. 2003. Adult brightness vs. luminance as models of infant photometry: Variability, biasability and spectral characteristics for two age groups favour the luminance model. J of Vision. 3: 333–346.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton WA, Chen E. 1978. What is visual clarity? J Illum Eng Soc. 7 (2): 85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton WA, Chen E, Morton EW, Rachko D. 1980 October. Brightness Meter. J Illum Eng Soc. 10 (1): 52–63.
   Google Scholar
• Tiller DK, Veitch JA. 1995. Perceived room brightness: Pilot study on the effect of luminance distribution. Light Res Technol. 27 (2): 93–101.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, New Series, 185 (4157): 1124–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthey JA. 1985. An analytical visual clarity experiment. J Illum Eng Soc. 15 (1): 239–251.
   Google Scholar
• Zheleznikova OE, Myasoedova EI. 1995. Comparison of luminosities of lighting installations with discharge light sources. Light & Eng. 3 (2): 38–39.
   Google Scholar