Effect of Window Glazing Type on Daylight Quality: Scale Model Study of a Living Room under Natural Sky

References

• Baker N. 2000. We are all outdoor animals. In: Proc. of PLEA 2000 (Architecture City Environment). London: James & James: 553–55.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce PR, Eklund N, Magnum S, Saalfield C, Tang L. 1995. Minimum acceptable transmittance of glazing. Lighting Res. Technol. 27 (3): 145–152.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce PR, Beckstead JW, Gutkowski JM, Fan J, Strobel RW. 1992. Brightness-enhancing glazing: perception, performance and energy. Report from MSR Scientific to Public Works Canada, Ottawa: Public Works Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce PR, Beckstead JW, Gutkowski JM, Rea M. 1991. Brightness-enhancing glazing. Report from MSR Scientific to Public Works Canada. Ottawa: Public Works Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Brown DeKay., 2001. Sun, Wind & Light: Architectural Design Strategies. 2nd Edition. New York: Wiley. 382 p.
   Google Scholar
• Bülow-Hübe H. 1995. Subjective reactions to daylight in rooms: effect of using low-emittance coatings on windows. Lighting Res. Technol. 27 (1): 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Chain C. 2004. Caractérisation spectrale et directionnelle de la lumière naturelle: application à l'éclairage des bǎtiments. Doctoral thesis. Institut National des sciences appliquées de Lyon. France.
   Google Scholar
• Chain C, Dumortier D, Fontoynont M. 2001. Consideration of daylight's color. Energy and Buildings. 33(2001):193–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoffersen J, Petersen E, Johnsen K, Valbjørn O, Hygge S. 1999. Vinduer og dagslys - en feltundersøgelse i kontorbygninger (Windows and Daylight - a Post-occupancy Evaluation of Offices). SBI-rapport 318. Statens Byggeforskningsinstitut. Hørsholm (Denmark). 71 pages (in Danish).
   Google Scholar
• Color calculator. 2008. Easy RGB. Available from: http://www.easyrgb.com/
   Google Scholar
• Cooper JR, Wilshire TJ, Hardy AC. 1973. Attitudes towards the use of heat rejecting/low light transmission glasses in office buildings. In: Proc. of the CIE TC-42 Daylight Symposium, Architectural Design Proc. Istanbul, Tukey.
   Google Scholar
• Cowdroy R. 1972. A Study of the scalar effect in the use of models for the assessment of glare, M. Blg. Sc. Thesis of the Macquaire University, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Cuttle K. 1979. Subjective assessments of the appearance of special performance glazing in offices. Lighting Res. and Technol. 11 (3): 140–149.
   Google Scholar
• Demers C. 2006. Assessing light in architecture: a numerical procedure for a qualitative and quantitative analysis. In: Conference proceedings in International Lighting Conference, Venise (Italie), October 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Demers C. 1997. The sanctuary of art: images in the assessment and design of light in architecture. Ph.D. Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois M-C, Cantin F, Johnsen K. 2007. The effect of coated glazing on visual perception: A pilot study using scale models. Lighting Res. Technol. 39 (3): 283–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontoynont M. 2002. Perceived performance of daylighting systems: lighting efficacy and agreeableness. Solar Energy 73 (2): 83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hårlemann M. 2007. Study of Color Shifts in Various Daylights: Dominantly Reddish and Greenish Rooms Illuminated by Sunlight and Skylight. J Color Design Creativity. 1 (1): 8. pp. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins PL, Phillips TJ, Mulberg EJ, Hui SP. 1992. Activity patterns of Californians: Use of and proximity to indoor pollutant sources. Atmos Environ. 26A: 2141–2148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanaya S, Hashimoto K, Kichize E. 1979. Subjective balance between general color rendering index, color temperature and illuminance of interior lighting. In: Proceedings of CIE 19th session 50:274–278.
   Google Scholar
• Knez I. 1995. Effects of indoor lighting on mood and cognition. J Environ Psychology. 15: 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knez I, Enmarker I. 1998. Effects of office lighting on mood and cognitive performance and a gender effect in work-related judgment. Environment and Behavior. 30: 553–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotlík B, Mikešová M, Kazmarová H. 2008. Indoor Air Sampling Strategy. Central European Journal of Public Health. No 1.
   Google Scholar
• Laouadi A, Parekh A. 2006. Lighting characteristics of complex fenestration systems. In: Proc. of IBPSA-Canada Esim Conference (pp. 1–7). Toronto, Ont.
   Google Scholar
• Lau J. 1972. Use of scale models for appraising lighting quality. Lighting Res. Technol. 4 (4): 254–262.
   Google Scholar
• Lechner N. 2001. Heating, Cooling and Lighting. 2nd Edition. New York; Toronto: John Wiley & Sons. 620 p.
   Google Scholar
• Liljefors A, Ejhed J. 1990. Bättre belysning (in English; Improved lighting). Report T17. Stockholm: Statens råd för byggnadsforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Pineault N, Dubois M-C, Demers CMH & Briche M. 2008. Effect of coated and tinted glazing on daylight quality in a residential space: experimental study in scale model. Proc. of Challenging Glass Conference. TU Delft, 22–23 May 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Tosco A-M, Arsenault CD. 2004. Photometric issues in healthy lighting research and application. In: Proc of the CIE Symposium '04 - Light and Health: Non-Visual Effects. Vienna, Austria. Sept. 30-Oct. 2, 2004, pp. 146–149.
   Google Scholar