Experimental Validation of Autodesk® 3ds Max® Design 2009 and Daysim 3.0

References

• Aizlewood ME. 1993. “Innovative daylighting systems: An experimental evaluation.” Light Res Tech. 25(4):141–152.
   Google Scholar
• [ASHRAE] American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers. 2007. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 140–2007 Standard Method of Test for the Evaluation of Building Energy Analysis Computer Programs. Atlanta. ASHRAE. 2007
   Google Scholar
• Bleicher T. 2008. Radiance plug-in for SketchUp www.bozzograo.net/radiancewiki/doku.php/input:exporters:su2rad. last accessed in December 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgeois D, Reinhart CF, Ward G. 2008. A Standard Daylight Coefficient Model for Dynamic Daylighting Simulations. Building Res Inform. 36 (1): 68–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage. 2004. ISO 15469/ CIE S 011/E Spatial distribution of daylight - CIE standard general sky. 2nd edition. Geneva, Switzerland. ISO/CIE. 2004
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage. 2006. CIE 171 - Test cases to assess the accuracy of lighting computer programs. Vienna, Austria. CIE. 2006
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra D, Reinhart CF. 2009. Daylight factor simulations - How close do simulation beginners ‘really’ get? Building Simulation 2009. Glasgow, Scottland, IBPSA 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis D, Donn M. 1997. Comparison of computer and model simulations of a daylit interior with reality. 5th International Building Performance Simulation Association (IBPSA) Conference. Prague. IBPSA. 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Li DhW, Chueng GHW, Chueng KL. 2006. Evaluating an indoor illuminance calculation tool against full-scale measured data. Arch Sci Rev. 49 (3): 285–294.
   Google Scholar
• Mardaljevic J. 1995. Validation of a Lighting Simulation Program under Real Sky Conditions. Light Res Tech. 27 (4): 181–188.
   Google Scholar
• Mardaljevic J. 2000. The BRE-IDMP dataset: a new benchmark for the validation of illuminance prediction techniques. Light Res Tech. 33 (2): 117–136.
   Google Scholar
• mental images. 2007. Mental ray(R) Functional Overview Version 1.5, ≤http://www.mentalimages.com/fileadmin/user_upload/PDF/mental_ray_Functional_Overview.pdf≥ Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Nabil A, Mardaljevic J. 2005. Useful Daylight Illuminance: A New Paradigm to Access Daylight in Buildings. Ligh Res Tech. 37 (1): 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• Tregenza P R. 1983. Daylight Coefficients. Ligh Res Tech. 15 (2): 65–71.
   Google Scholar
• Perez R, Seals R, Michalsky J. 1993. All-Weather Model for Sky Luminance Distribution - Preliminary Configuration and Validation. Solar Energy. 50 (3): 235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart C, Mardaljevic J, Rogers Z. 2006. Dynamic Daylight Performance Metrics for Sustainable Building Design. Leukos. 3 (1): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF. 2004. LIGHTSWITCH 2002: A model for manual and automated control of electric lighting and blinds. Solar Energy. 77 (1): 15–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF. 2006. Tutorial on the Use of Daysim Simulations for Sustainable Design, Software Documentation. Ottawa, Canada, National Research Council Canada Institute for Research in Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF, Andersen M. 2006. Development and validation of a Radiance model for a translucent panel. Energy Build. 38 (7): 890–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF, Fitz A. 2006. Findings from a survey on the current use of daylight simulations in building design. Energy Build. 38 (7): 824–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF, Herkel S. 2000. The Simulation of Annual Daylight Illuminance Distributions-A state of the art comparison of six RADIANCE-based methods. Energy Build. 32 (2): 167–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF, Voss K. 2003. Monitoring Manual Control of Electric Lighting and Blinds. Light Res Tech. 35 (3): 243–260.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF, Walkenhorst O. 2001. Dynamic RADIANCE-based Daylight Simulations for a full-scale Test Office with outer Venetian Blinds. Energy Build. 33 (7): 683–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SketchUp. 2008. SketchUp Version 7. http://sketchup.google.com/. last accessed December 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Tsangrassoulis A, Santamouris M, Asimakopoulos D. 1996. Theoretical and experimental analysis of daylighting performance for various shading systems. Energy Build. 24: 223–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [USGBC] United States Green Building Council. 2006. LEED-NC (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Version 2.2. from www.usgbc.org/LEED/.
   Google Scholar
• Ward G and Rubinstein F 1988. “A New Technique for Computer Simulation of Illuminated Spaces.” Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society 1:80–91.
   Google Scholar
• Ward G, Shakespeare R. 1998. Rendering with RADIANCE: The Art and Science of Lighting Visualization. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. 690 p.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold J. 2007. Dynamic simulation of blind control strategies for visual comfort and energy balance analysis. Building Simulation 2007, Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold J, Christoffersen J. 2006. Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction method for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy Build. 38 (7): 743–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkelmann FC, Selkowitz S. 1985. Daylight simulation in the DOE-2 building energy analysis program. Energy Build. 8: 271–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar