Visual saliency of urban objects at night: Impact of the density of background light patterns

References

• Adrian W, Eberbach K. 1969. On the relationship between the visual threshold and the size of the surrounding field. Lighting Res Technol. 1 (4): 251–254.
   Google Scholar
• Aks DJ, Enns JT. 1996. Visual search for size is influenced by a background texture gradient. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 22 (6): 1467–1481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biederman I, Mezzanotte RJ, Rabinowitz JC. 1982. Scene perception: detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cogn Psychol. 14 (2): 143–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield JR. 1972. Visual search in complex fields: size differences between target disc and surrounding discs. Hum Factors. 14 (2): 139–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill C. 1996. Fractal Geometry in Architecture and Design. York (PA): Birkhauser Boston. 195 p.
   Google Scholar
• Carrera F. 1997. Campo Santa Maria Formosa, Venice, Italy: A case study of the application of visual, dynamic and scale-invariant analyses for the description, interpretation and evaluation of city form. [term paper]. [Boston (MA)]: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Chun MM. 2005. Contextual guidance of visual attention. In: Itti L, Rees G, Tsotsos JK. eds. Neurobiology of Attention. London (UK): Elsevier Academic Press. 744 p.
   Google Scholar
• Coeterier JF. 1983. A photo validity test. J Exp Psychol. 3 (4): 315–323.
   Google Scholar
• Cuttle C. 1971. Lighting patterns and the flow of light. Lighting Res Technol. 3 (3): 171–186.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudian N. 2010. The Impact of background lighting complexity on the visual saliency of urban objects at night. [dissertation]. [Sheffield (UK)]: University of Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone R, Duncan J. 1995. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Ann Rev Neurosci. 18: 193–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckstein MP, Ahumada AJ, Watson AB. 1997. Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. II. Effects of contrast gain control, background variations and white noise. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 14 (9): 2406–2419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen BA, Eriksen CW. 1974. Effect of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys. 16: 143–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson BS, Jiang Y. 2001. Visual marking and the perception of salience in visual search. Percept Psychophys. 63 (1): 59–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon G. 2003. Interior Lighting for Designers, 4th ed. Hoboken (NY): John Wiely & Sons. 312 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hagiwara T, Kizaka K, Fujita S. 2004. Development of visibility assessment methods with digital images under foggy conditions. Transport Res Rec. 1862: 95–108.
   Google Scholar
• [ILE] Institute for Lighting Engineers. 2005. The outdoor lighting guide. New York (NY): Taylor & Francis. 379 p.
   Google Scholar
• Itti L. 2005. Model of bottom-up attention and saliency. In: Itti L, Rees G, Tsotsos JK. eds. Neurobiology of Attention. London (UK): Elsevier Academic Press. 744 p.
   Google Scholar
• Itti L, Koch C, Niebur E. 2002. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE T Pattern Anal. 20 (11): 1254–1259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakel F, Wichmann FA. 2006. Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naive observers. J Vision. 6 (11): 1307–1322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay P. 2002. Subjective criteria for lighting design. Lighting Res Technol. 34 (2): 87–99.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins SE, Cole BL. 1982. The effect of the density of background elements on the conspicuity of objects. Vision Res. 22 (10): 1241–1252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura H, Noguchi T. 2002. Measurement of effective luminance in actual visual field using digital camera. J Architecture (Japan). 551: 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Moberly NJ, Langham MP. 2002. Pedestrian conspicuity at night: failure to observe a biological motion advantage in a high clutter environment. Appl Cognitive Psych. 16 (4): 477–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore T, Graves H, Perry MJ, Carter DJ. 2000. Approximate field measurements of surface luminance using a digital camera. Lighting Res Technol. 32 (1): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Nasar JL. ed. 1998. Environmental aesthetics: theory, research and applications. Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press. 560 p.
   Google Scholar
• Nothdurft HC. 2000. Salience from feature contrast: variations with texture density. Vision Res. 40 (23): 3181–3200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nothdurft HC. 1992. Feature analysis and the role of similarity in pre-attentive vision. Perception and Psychophysics, 52: 355–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nothdurft HC. 1993. Saliency Effects Across Dimensions in Visual Search. Vision Res. 33 (5–6): 839–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer SE. 1975. The effect of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Mem Cognition. 3 (5): 519–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulmier G, Brusque C, Carta V, Nguyen V. 2001. The influence of visual complexity on the detection of targets investigated by computer generated images. Lighting Res Technol. 33 (3): 197–207.
   Google Scholar
• Poulton EC. 1989. Bias in quantifying Judgments. London (UK): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. 304 p.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R. ed. 1991. Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, Inc. 168 p.
   Google Scholar
• Shuttleworth S. 1980. The use of photographs as an environmental presentation medium in landscape studies. J Environ Manage. 11: 61–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith PL. 1998. Attention and luminance detection: a quantitative analysis. J Exp Psychol Human. 24 (1): 105–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman A, Gelade G. 1980. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol. 12 (1): 97–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turatto M, Galfano G. 2000. Rapid communication: Color, form and luminance capture attention in visual search. Vision Res. 40 (13): 1639–1643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrrell RA, Wood JM, Chaparro A, Carberry TP, Chu BS, Marszalek RP. 2009. Seeing pedestrians at night: visual clutter does not mask biological motion. Accident Anal Prev. 41 (3): 506–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wager JA, Heisler GM. 1986. Rating winter crown density of deciduous trees: a photographic procedure. Landscape J. 5 (10): 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe JM, Oliva A, Horowitz TS, Butcher SJ, Bompas A. 2002. Segmentation of objects from backgrounds in visual search tasks. Vision Res. 42 (28): 2985–3004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar