Comparative in Situ Study of LEDs and HPS in Road Lighting

References

• Adrian WK. 1987. Visibility levels under night-time driving conditions. J. Illum. Eng. Soc. 16 (2): 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Adrian WK. 1989. Visibility of targets: model for calculation. Light Res Technol. 21 (4): 181–188.
   Google Scholar
• Ekrias A, Eloholma M, Halonen L. 2009. The effects of color contrast and pavement aggregate type on road lighting performance. Light Eng., 17 (3): 76–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacelar A, Cariou J, Hamard M. 1999. Calculational visibility model for road lighting installations. Light Res Technol. 31 (4): 177–180.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage. 2010. Recommended system for mesopic photometry based on visual performance. CIE Publication 191: 2010. Vienna (Austria):Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage. 79 p.
   Google Scholar
• Dijon JM, Justin M. 1998. Quality criteria for road lighting: Luminance and uniformity levels? Or visibility? National Illumination Congress. Istanbul (Turkey). 138–144.
   Google Scholar
• Ekrias A, Eloholma M, Halonen L. 2009. The effects of colour contrast and pavement aggregate type on road lighting performance. Light Eng. 17 (3): 76–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Cheal C. 2007. Lighting for subsidiary streets: Investigation of lamps of different SPD. Part 2-Brightness. Light Res Technol. 39 (3): 233–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Cheal C, Boyce PR. 2005. Light source spectrum, brightness perception and visual performance in pedestrian environments: A review. Light Res Technol. 37 (4): 271–294.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher V, Koth B, Freedman M. 1975. The specification of street lighting needs. Report no. FHWA-RD-76-17. U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Research and Development. 139 p.
   Google Scholar
• Güler Ö, Onaygil S. 2003. The effect of luminance uniformity on visibility level in road lighting. Light Res Technol. 35 (3): 199–215.
   Google Scholar
• Ashdown I. 2007. Solid-state lighting: A systems engineering approach. Opt Photonics News. 18 (1): 24–3.
   Google Scholar
• [IESNA] Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. 2005. RP-8-00: Recommended practice for street lighting. New York (NY): Illuminating Engineering Society. 23p.
   Google Scholar
• Janoff MS, Koth B, McCunney W, Freedman M., Duerk C, Berkovitz M. 1977. Effectiveness of highway arterial lighting. Report no. FHWA-RD-77-37. U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Offices of Research and Development. 207 p.
   Google Scholar
• Janoff MS. 1990. The effect of visibility on driver performance: a dynamic Experiment. J Illum Eng Soc. 19 (1): 57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Janoff MS. 1993. Visibility vs. response distance: A comparison of two experiments and the implications of their results. J Illum Eng Soc. 22 (1): 104–112.
   Google Scholar
• Keck ME. 2001. A new visibility criteria for roadway lighting. J Illum Eng Soc. 30 (1): 86–88.
   Google Scholar
• Ising KW, Green M. 2009. The distribution of visibility levels at target detection in a modified Adrian/CIE visibility model. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53rd Annual Meeting. 53(23):1796–1800.
   Google Scholar
• Lecocq J. 1997. Visibility in road lighting-correlation of subjective assessments with calculated values. Proceedings of the 8th Lux Europa. Amsterdam (Netherlands). 1:22–36.
   Google Scholar
• Lipinski ME, Keck M, Shelby BL. 1993. Visibility measures of realistic roadway tasks. J Illum Eng Soc. 22 (2): 94–101.
   Google Scholar
• Menard J, Cariou J. 1994. Road lighting: Assessment of an installation based on the contrast of a standard target. Ligh Res Technol. 26 (1): 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Mutmansky M, Givler T, Clanton N, Edwards C, Lee A. 2009. Street Lighting Survey for Commercial Areas in the Municipality of Anchorage, Final Report. Anchorage (AK): Municipality of Anchorage. 100 p.
   Google Scholar
• Mutmansky M, Giver T, Garcia J, Clanton N, Gibbons R, Edwards C, DeJean D, Cartier T, Hudson C. 2010. Advanced Street Lighting Technologies Assessment Project – City of San Diego, Final Report. San Diego (CA): San Diego Gas and Electric. 96 p.
   Google Scholar
• Okawa M, Kobayashi S, Okajima K. 2009. Study on the effect of light source spectrum on apparent road surface brightness. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Automotive Lighting. Darmstadt, Germany. Munich (Germany): Herbert Utz Verlag. 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Bodrogi P, Vas Z, Haferkemper N, Varady G, Schiller C, Khanh TQ, Schanda J. 2010. Effect of chromatic mechanisms on the detection of mesopic incremental targets at different eccentricities. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 30 (1): 85–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puolakka M, Halonen L. 2010. CIE new system for mesopic photometry. CIE x 035: roceedings of CIE Lighting Quality and Energy-Efficiency. Vienna, Austria. Vienna (Austria): CIE Central Bureau. 457–462.
   Google Scholar
• Rea M, Bullough J, Akashi Y. 2009. Several views of metal halide and high pressure sodium lighting for outdoor applications. Light Res Technol. 41 (4): 297–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rea MS, Radetsky LC and Bullough JD. 2011. Toward a model of outdoor lighting scene brightness. Light Res Technol. 43 (1): 7–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabey BE, Staughton EC. 1975. Interacting roles of road environment, vehicle and road user in accidents. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the International Association for Accident and Traffic Medicine. London, England. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Van Bommel WJM. 1978. Design considerations for roadway lighting. J Illum Eng Soc. 7 (3): 40–46.
   Google Scholar