Current status of sentinel lymph node mapping in the management of cervical cancer

References

• Arbyn M, Castellsagué X, de Sanjosé S et al. Worldwide burden of cervical cancer in 2008. Ann. Oncol. 22(12), 2675–2686 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int. J. Cancer 127(12), 2893–2917 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson M, Saraiya M, Benard V et al. Burden of cervical cancer in the United States, 1998-2003. Cancer 113(10 Suppl.), 2855–2864 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rob L, Skapa P, Robova H. Fertility-sparing surgery in patients with cervical cancer. Lancet Oncol. 12(2), 192–200 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rob L, Halaska M, Robova H. Nerve-sparing and individually tailored surgery for cervical cancer. Lancet Oncol. 11(3), 292–301 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Undurraga M, Loubeyre P, Dubuisson JB, Schneider D, Petignat P. Early-stage cervical cancer: is surgery better than radiotherapy? Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 10(3), 451–460 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrzackova P, Weiss P, Cibula D. Sexual morbidity following radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 10(7), 1037–1042 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmark K, Avall-Lundqvist E, Dickman PW, Henningsohn L, Steineck G. Vaginal changes and sexuality in women with a history of cervical cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 340(18), 1383–1389 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Sawaya G, Thom DH, Grady D. Hysterectomy and urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Lancet 356(9229), 535–539 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höckel M, Konerding MA, Heussel CP. Liposuction-assisted nerve-sparing extended radical hysterectomy: oncologic rationale, surgical anatomy, and feasibility study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 178(5), 971–976 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii S, Takakura K, Matsumura N et al. Anatomic identification and functional outcomes of the nerve sparing Okabayashi radical hysterectomy. Gynecol. Oncol. 107(1), 4–13 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trimbos JB, van den Tillaart HM, Maas CP et al. The swift operation: a modification of the Leiden nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Gynecol. Surg.5, 193–198 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R et al. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique for preserving the autonomic hypogastric nerve. Gynecol. Oncol. 93(2), 307–314 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Querleu D, Narducci F, Poulard V et al. Modified radical vaginal hysterectomy with or without laparoscopic nerve-sparing dissection: a comparative study. Gynecol. Oncol. 85(1), 154–158 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rob L, Robova H, Chmel R, Komar M, Halaska M, Skapa P. Surgical options in early cervical cancer. Int. J. Hyperthermia 28(6), 489–500 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panici PB, Angioli R, Palaia I et al. Tailoring the parametrectomy in stages IA2-IB1 cervical carcinoma: is it feasible and safe? Gynecol. Oncol. 96(3), 792–798 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landoni F, Bocciolone L, Perego P, Maneo A, Bratina G, Mangioni C. Cancer of the cervix, FIGO stages IB and IIA: patterns of local growth and paracervical extension. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 5(5), 329–334 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covens A, Rosen B, Murphy J et al. How important is removal of the parametrium at surgery for carcinoma of the cervix? Gynecol. Oncol. 84(1), 145–149 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh N, Arif S. Histopathologic parameters of prognosis in cervical cancer – a review. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 14(5), 741–750 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zivanovic O, Leitao MM Jr, Park KJ et al. Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: analysis of outcome, recurrence pattern and the impact of platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Gynecol. Oncol. 112(3), 590–593 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• deSouza NM, Dina R, McIndoe GA, Soutter WP. Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension. Gynecol. Oncol. 102(1), 80–85 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sahdev A, Sohaib SA, Wenaden AE, Shepherd JH, Reznek RH. The performance of magnetic resonance imaging in early cervical carcinoma: a long-term experience. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 17(3), 629–636 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischerova D, Cibula D, Stenhova H et al. Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of early cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 18(4), 766–772 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strnad P, Robova H, Skapa P et al. A prospective study of sentinel lymph node status and parametrial involvement in patients with small tumour volume cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 109(2), 280–284 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegeman M, Louwen M, van der Velden J et al. The incidence of parametrial tumor involvement in select patients with early cervix cancer is too low to justify parametrectomy. Gynecol. Oncol. 105(2), 475–480 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frumovitz M, Sun CC, Schmeler KM et al. Parametrial involvement in radical hysterectomy specimens for women with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet. Gynecol. 114(1), 93–99 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selman TJ, Mann C, Zamora J, Appleyard TL, Khan K. Diagnostic accuracy of tests for lymph node status in primary cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 178(7), 855–862 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JD, Dehdashti F, Herzog TJ et al. Preoperative lymph node staging of early-stage cervical carcinoma by [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography. Cancer 104(11), 2484–2491 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signorelli M, Guerra L, Montanelli L et al. Preoperative staging of cervical cancer: is 18-FDG-PET/CT really effective in patients with early stage disease? Gynecol. Oncol. 123(2), 236–240 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockall AG, Sohaib SA, Harisinghani MG et al. Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 23(12), 2813–2821 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabanas RM. An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer 39(2), 456–466 (1977).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised Phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 11(10), 927–933 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansel RE, Fallowfield L, Kissin M et al. Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 98(9), 599–609 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenback CF, van der Zee AG, Rob L et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with gynecologic cancers Expert panel statement from the International Sentinel Node Society Meeting, February 21, 2008. Gynecol. Oncol. 114(2), 151–156 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plante M, Renaud MC, Têtu B, Harel F, Roy M. Laparoscopic sentinel node mapping in early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 91(3), 494–503 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rob L, Strnad P, Robova H et al. Study of lymphatic mapping and sentinel node identification in early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 98(2), 281–288 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marnitz S, Köhler C, Bongardt S, Braig U, Hertel H, Schneider A; German Association of Gynecologic Oncologists (AGO). Topographic distribution of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 103(1), 35–44 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altgassen C, Hertel H, Brandstädt A, Köhler C, Dürst M, Schneider A; AGO Study Group. Multicenter validation study of the sentinel lymph node concept in cervical cancer: AGO Study Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 26(18), 2943–2951 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lécuru F, Mathevet P, Querleu D et al. Bilateral negative sentinel nodes accurately predict absence of lymph node metastasis in early cervical cancer: results of the SENTICOL study. J. Clin. Oncol. 29(13), 1686–1691 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slama J, Dundr P, Dusek L et al. Sentinel lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancers and impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Gynecol. Oncol. 125(2), 303–306 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altgassen C, Paseka A, Urbanczyk H et al. Dilution of dye improves parametrial SLN detection in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 105(2), 329–334 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cormier B, Diaz JP, Shih K et al. Establishing a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm for the treatment of early cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 122(2), 275–280 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roy M, Bouchard-Fortier G, Popa I et al. Value of sentinel node mapping in cancer of the cervix. Gynecol. Oncol. 122(2), 269–274 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bricou A, Barranger E, Uzan S, Darai E. Anaphylactic shock during the sentinel lymph node procedure for cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 114(2), 375–376 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vieira SC, Sousa RB, Tavares MB et al. Changes in pulse oximetry after patent blue dye injection into the uterine cervix. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 15(10), 2862–2866 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kieckbusch H, Coldewey SM, Hollenhorst J, Haeseler G, Hillemanns P, Hertel H. Patent blue sentinel node mapping in cervical cancer patients may lead to decreased pulse oximeter readings and positive methaemoglobin results. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 25(5), 365–368 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pluta M, Rob L, Charvat M et al. Less radical surgery than radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a pilot study. Gynecol. Oncol. 113(2), 181–184 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du XL, Sheng XG, Jiang T et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy as guidance for radical trachelectomy in young patients with early stage cervical cancer. BMC Cancer 11, 157 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gortzak-Uzan L, Jimenez W, Nofech-Mozes S et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy vs. pelvic lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: is it time to change the gold standard? Gynecol. Oncol. 116(1), 28–32 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daraï E, Lavoué V, Rouzier R, Coutant C, Barranger E, Bats AS. Contribution of the sentinel node procedure to tailoring the radicality of hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 106(1), 251–256 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Devaja O, Mehra G, Coutts M et al. A prospective single-center study of sentinel lymph node detection in cervical carcinoma: is there a place in clinical practice? Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 22(6), 1044–1049 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darlin L, Persson J, Bossmar T et al. The sentinel node concept in early cervical cancer performs well in tumors smaller than 2 cm. Gynecol. Oncol. 117(2), 266–269 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chéreau E, Feron JG, Ballester M et al. Contribution of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy with sentinel node biopsy in patients with IB2-IIB cervical cancer. Br. J. Cancer 106(1), 39–44 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kato H, Todo Y, Minobe S et al. Previous conization on patient eligibility of sentinel lymph node detection for early invasive cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 21(8), 1491–1494 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diaz JP, Gemignani ML, Pandit-Taskar N et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of early-stage cervical carcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol. 120(3), 347–352 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wydra D, Sawicki S, Wojtylak S, Bandurski T, Emerich J. Sentinel node identification in cervical cancer patients undergoing transperitoneal radical hysterectomy: a study of 100 cases. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 16(2), 649–654 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gien LT, Covens A. Quality control in sentinel lymph node biopsy in cervical cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 26(18), 2930–2931 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bats AS, Lavoué V, Rouzier R, Coutant C, Kerrou K, Daraï E. Limits of day-before lymphoscintigraphy to localize sentinel nodes in women with cervical cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 15(8), 2173–2179 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bats AS, Lavoué V, Barranger E, Daraï E. Is preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node in cervical cancer required? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 197(1), 116 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martínez A, Zerdoud S, Mery E, Bouissou E, Ferron G, Querleu D. Hybrid imaging by SPECT/CT for sentinel lymph node detection in patients with cancer of the uterine cervix. Gynecol. Oncol. 119(3), 431–435 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vieira SC, Sousa RB, Tavares MB et al. Preoperative pelvic lymphoscintigraphy is of limited usefulness for sentinel lymph node detection in cervical cancer. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 145(1), 96–99 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cibula D, Kuzel D, Sláma J et al. Sentinel node (SLN) biopsy in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 115(1), 46–50 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ogawa S, Kobayashi H, Amada S et al. Sentinel node detection with (99m)Tc phytate alone is satisfactory for cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 15(1), 52–58 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silva LB, Silva-Filho AL, Traiman P et al. Sentinel node detection in cervical cancer with (99m)Tc-phytate. Gynecol. Oncol. 97(2), 588–595 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 9(3), 297–303 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UICC. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. Wiley-Liss, NY, USA ISBN 80-7280-391-3 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Colleoni M, Rotmensz N, Peruzzotti G. Size of breast cancer metastases in axillary lymph nodes: clinical relevance of minimal lymph node involvement. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 1379–1389 (2005)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR, Dusek L et al. Prognostic significance of low volume sentinel lymph node disease in early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 124(3), 496–501 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daraï E, Rouzier R, Ballester M, Barranger E, Coutant C. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in gynaecological cancers: the importance of micrometastases in cervical cancer. Surg. Oncol. 17(3), 227–235 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frumovitz M, Ramirez PT, Levenback CF. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node detection in women with cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 110(3 Suppl. 2), S17–S20 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Rob L, Pluta M, Strnad P et al. A less radical treatment option to the fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 111(Suppl. 2), S116–S120 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euscher ED, Malpica A, Atkinson EN, Levenback CF, Frumovitz M, Deavers MT. Ultrastaging improves detection of metastases in sentinel lymph nodes of uterine cervix squamous cell carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 32(9), 1336–1343 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bats AS, Buénerd A, Querleu D et al.; SENTICOL collaborative group. Diagnostic value of intraoperative examination of sentinel lymph node in early cervical cancer: a prospective, multicenter study. Gynecol. Oncol. 123(2), 230–235 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fader AN, Edwards RP, Cost M et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage cervical cancer: utility of intraoperative versus postoperative assessment. Gynecol. Oncol. 111(1), 13–17 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto S, Niikura H, Yoshinaga K et al. Detection of micrometastases in cervical cancer with a system that evaluates both sentinel and nonsentinel lymph nodes. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 19(4), 708–711 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horn LC, Hentschel B, Fischer U, Peter D, Bilek K. Detection of micrometastases in pelvic lymph nodes in patients with carcinoma of the cervix uteri using step sectioning: frequency, topographic distribution and prognostic impact. Gynecol. Oncol. 111(2), 276–281 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Popa I, Plante M, Renaud MC, Roy M, Têtu B. Negative sentinel lymph node accurately predicts negative status of pelvic lymph nodes in uterine cervix carcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol. 103(2), 649–653 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rob L, Charvat M, Robova H et al. Less radical fertility-sparing surgery than radical trachelectomy in early cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 17(1), 304–310 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rob L, Pluta M, Skapa P, Robova H. Advances in fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 10(7), 1101–1114 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar