References
- Parkin D M, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55(2):74-108
- Li M, Gu J. Changing patterns of colorectal cancer over the recent two recent decades in China. Chin J Gastrointest Surg 2004;7(3):214-17
- Abraham N S, Young J M, Solomon M J. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2004;91(9):1111-24
- Ma Y, Yang Z, Qin H, et al. A meta-analysis of laparoscopy compared with open colorectal resection for colorectal cancer. Med Oncol 2011;28(4):925-33
- Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, et al. A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for colorectal cancer. J Cancer 2011;2:425-34
- Schulz K F, Altman D G, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med 2010;7(3):e1000251
- Bo C, Xue Z, Yi G, et al. Assessing the quality of reports about randomized controlled trials of acupuncture treatment on Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. PLoS One 2012;7(7):e38461
- Zheng M. The status quo and prospect of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Chin J Pract Surg 2011;31(9):841-3
- Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz K F, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg 2012;10(1):28-55
- Davidoff F. News from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Ann Intern Med 2000;133(3):229-31
- Huwiler-Muntener K, Juni P, Junker C, et al. Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality. JAMA 2002;287(21):2801-4
- Schulz K F, Chalmers I, Grimes D A, et al. Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals. JAMA 1994;272(2):125-8
- Schulz K F, Chalmers I, Hayes R J, et al. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273(5):408-12
- Hall JC, Mills B, Nguyen H, Hall JL. Methodologic standards in surgical trials. Surgery 1996;119(4):466-72
- Jh Z. The quality evaluation of articles from Chinese Journal of General Surgery nearly five years. Chengdu:Sichuan University, 2006
- Zeng X, Shen K, Luo J. Meta Analysis Series 12: Evaluation of allocation concealment. Chin J Evid Based Cardiovasc Med 2013;3(5):219-21
- Shikata S, Nakayama T, Yamagishi H. Quality of surgical randomized controlled trials for acute cholecystitis: assessment based on CONSORT and additional check items. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2008;15(3):297-303
- Liu M. RCT is required in the research of curative effects of surgical operations. Chin J Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;6(11):561-2
- Peace K. Intention to treat in clinical trials [M] Ke P, editor. Statistical issues in drug research and development. Marcel Dekker; New York: 1990. p. 331-50
- Hollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ 1999;319(7211):670-4
- Mao B, Wang G, Fan T, et al. Quality evaluation of RCT in traditional Chinese medicine. Chin J Evid-based Med 2007;7(12):880-6