Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery

References

• UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial investigators. Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial. Lancet (359), 1291–1300 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson METE et al Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 348,1472–1477 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronborg 0, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard 0. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal occult blood test. Lancet348, 1467–1471 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Vardulaki IKA, Bennett-Lloyd BD, Parfitt J etal A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK, 1–103 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• ••Excellent systemic review of currentevidence.
   Google Scholar
• Schwenk W, Bohm B, Witt C etal Pulmonary function following laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resection. Arch. Surg. 134,6–12 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer IKA etal A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. jAm. Coll Surg. 187(1), 46–57 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuntz C, Wunsch A, Bay F etal Prospective randomized study of stress and immune response after laparoscopic versus conventional colonic resection. Surg. Endosc. 12(7), 963–967 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harmon GD, Senagore AJ, Kilbride MJ, Warzynski MJ. Interleukin-6 response to laparoscopic and open colectomy. Dir. Colon Rectum 37,754–759 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Colacchio TA, Yeager MP, Hildebrandt LW Perioperative immunomodulation in cancer surgery. A117. I Surg. 167,174-179 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Brune TB, Wilke W, Hensler T, Holzmann B, Siewert J-R. Downregulation of T-helper Type 1 immune response and altered pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory T-cell cytokine balance following conventional but not laparoscopic surgery. Am. J: Surg. 177,55-60 (1999). iiHildebrandt U, Kessler K, Plusczyk T etal Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open colonic resections. Surg. Endosc. 17,242-246 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Ordemann J, Jacobi C, Schwenk W, Stosslein R, Muller JM. Cellular and humoral inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections. Surg. Endosc. 15,600–608 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E etal The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery Clinical Practice Guidelines on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg. Endosc. 16, 1121–1143 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok SPY, Lau WY, Carey PD etal Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted large bowel excision for cancer. Ann. Surg. 223,170–176 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwenk W, Jacobi C, Mansmann U, Bohm B, Muller JM. Inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections: results of a prospective randomized trial. Langenbecks krh. Surg. 385,2-9 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Grabham JA, Pararajasingam R, Chillistone D, Barrie WW, Nicholson ML. The immune response to laparoscopic colorectal surgery. BE j Surg. 86\(Suppl. 1), 101 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Fukushima R, Kawamura YJ, Saito H etal. Interlukin-6 and stress hormone responses after uncomplicated gasless laparoscopic-assisted and open sigmoid colectomy. Dis. Colon Rectum 39, S29—S34 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G. Short-term quality of life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for colon cancer. jAm. Med. Assoc. 287,321–328 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• •Quality of life calculations.
   Google Scholar
• Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S etal. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet359, 2224–2229 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •Most widely quoted randomized trial.
   Google Scholar
• Bisgaard T, Kehlet H. Early oral feeding after elective abdominal surgery: what are the issues? Nutrition 18,944–948 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stage JG, Schulze S, Moller P etal Prospective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adenocarcinoma. BE J: Surg: 84(3), 391–396 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franklin ME, Rosenthal D, Abrego-Medina D etal. Prospective comparison of open versus laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma. Dis. Colon Rectum 39, S35—S36 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Lumley JW, Fielding GA, Rhodes M etal Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: lessons learned from 240 consecutive patients. Dis. Colon Rectum 39,155–159 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA, Mackeigan JM, Mazier WP. Open colectomy versus laparoscopic colectomy: are there any differences? Am. j Surg: 59, 549–554 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Kehlet H, Wilmore DW Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Surg 183,630–641 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• •Accelerated recovery programs after colorectal surgery.
   Google Scholar
• Taheri PA, Butz DA, Greenfield U. Length of stay has minimal impact on the cost of hospital admission. jAm. Coll Surg. 191, 123–130 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Tsioulias GJ, Wood TF, Chung MET, Morton DL, Bikhik A. Diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography optimize the staging and resectability of intra-abdominal neoplasms. Surg. Endosc. 15,1016–1019 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Bezzi M, Silecchia G, De Leo A etal Laparoscopic and intraoperative ultrasound. Eur. Radial. 27, S207—S214 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Koivusalo A-M, Lindgren L. Respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth. Analg: 89,800 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Koivusalo A-M, Kellokumpu I, Scheinin M etal A comparison of gasless mechanical and conventional carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum methods for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth. Analg: 86,153–158 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohm B, Schwenk W Junghans T Das Pneumoperitoneum: ausudrkungen der laparoskopie auf die orgamysteme. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany (2000).
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Clinical Excellence (UK). Guidance on the use of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London, UK, 1–6 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Vukasin P, Ortega AE, Greene FL. Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection. Results of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Laparoscopic Registry. Dis. Colon Rectum 39, S20—S23 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Walsh DC, Wattchow DA, Wilson TG. Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic resection of malignancy. Aust. NZ j Surg: 63,563-565 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Fusco MA, Paluzzi MW Abdominal wall recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for adenocarcinoma of the colon: report of a case. Dis. Colon Rectum 36,858–861 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley JE, Mehigan BJ, MacDonald AW, Lee PWR, Monson JR. Patterns of recurrence and survival after laparoscopic and conventional resections for colorectal carcinoma. Ann. Surg: 232,181-186 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Basu A, Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R. Validity of current experimental evidence on laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Surg: Endosc. 17,179 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• •Excellent suggestion for future animal models.
   Google Scholar
• Bessa X, Castells A, Lacy AM etal. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open colectomy for colorectal cancer: influence on neoplastic cell mobilisation. Gastrointest. Surg. 5,66-73 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Zayyan KS, Christie-Brown JS, van Noorden S etal Rapid flow carbon dioxide laparoscopy disperses cancer cells into the peritoneal cavity but not the post sites in a new rat model. Surg: Endosc. 17,273–277 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lennard TW, Shenton BK, Borzotta A etal The influence of surgical operations on components of the human immune system. Br. Surg: 72,771–776 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen HJ, Moesgaard F, Kehlet H. Ranitidine for prevention of postoperative suppression of delayed hypersensitivity. Am. Surg: 157,291-294 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Walker CBJ, Bruce DM, Heys SD etal Minimal modulation of lymphocyte and natural killer cell subsets following minimal access surgery. Am j Surg: 177,48–54 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan PG, Fitzpatrick M, Course NE Laparoscopy is less immunotraumatic than laparotomy. Minim. Invasive Ther. 1, 241–244 (1992).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redmond HP, Watson RW, Houghton T etal Immune function in patients undergoing open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch. Surg: 129, 1240–1246 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allendorf JDF, Bessler M, Whelan DL etal Better preservation of immune function after laparoscopic-assisted versus open bowel resection in a murine model. Dis. Colon Rectum 39, S67—S72 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Trokel MJ, Bessler M, Treat MR, Whelan DL, Nowygrod R. Preservation of immune response after laparoscopy. Surg. Endosc. 8,1385–1388 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Tang CL, Eu KW, Tai BC etal Randomized clinical trial of the effect of open versus laparoscopically-assisted colectomy on systemic immunity in patients with colorectal cancer. BE j Surg: 88(6), 801–807 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whelan RL, Allendorf JDF, Gutt CN etal General oncologic effects of the laparoscopic surgical approach 1997 Frankfurt meeting of animal laparoscopic researchers. Surg: Endosc. 12(8), 1092–1095 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Allendorf JDF, Bessler M, Kayton ML etal Increased tumour establishment and growth after laparotomy vs. laparoscopy in a murine model. Arch. Surg: 130,649-653 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Lee SW, Gleason NR, Allendorf JDF etal A heat labile serum soluble factor(s) stimulates tumor growth following laparotomy in a murine model. Surg: Endosc. 13\(Suppl. 1), S22 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Da Costa ML, Redmond HP, Bouchier- Hayes D. The effect of laparotomy and laparoscopy on the establishment of spontaneous tumour metastases. Surgery 124(3), 516–525 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirman I, Cekie V, Poltaratskaia N etal Plasma from patients undergoing major open surgery stimulates in vitro tumour growth: lower insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 levels may, in part, account for this change. Surgery132, 186–192 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee SW Gleason NR, Ssenymanturo K etal Colon cancer tumour proliferative index is higher and tumour cell death rate is lower in mice undergoing laparotomy versus insuffiation. Surg: Endosc. 12,514 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Gutt CN, Kim Z-G, Schemmer P, Krahenbuhl L, Schmedt C-G. Impact of laparoscopic and conventional surgery on kupffer cells, tumor associated cd44 expression and intrahepatic tumor spread. Arch. Surg. 137,1408-1412 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Moore JWE, Bokey EL, Newland RC, Chapuis PH. Lymphovascular clearance in laparoscopically-assisted right hemicolectomy is similar to open surgery. Aust. NZJ Surg. 66,605–607 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung CC, Ha JPY, Tsang WVVC, Li MKW. Laparoscopic-assisted total mesorectal excision and colonic j pouch reconstruction in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg: Endosc. 15,1098–1101 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, Kitajima M. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoidal and rectal carcinoma. Dis. Colon Rectum 45 (12), 1648–1654 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, Seow- Choen F. Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br. Surg: 89,1551-1556 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Chung CC, Li MKW. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Surg: Endosc. 17,356 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasegawa H, Kabeshima Y, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S, Kitajima M. Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer. Surg. Endosc. (2003) (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ballesta Lopez C, Cid JA, Poves I etal Laparoscopic surgery in the elderly patient. Surg. Endosc. 17,333–337 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ogihara Y, Isshiki A, Kindscher JD, Goto H. Abdominal wall lift versus carbon dioxide insufflation for laparoscopic resection of ovarian tumours. J. Clin. Anaesth. 11,406–412 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koivusalo A-M, Kellokumpu I, Ristkari S, Lindgren L. Splanchnic and renal deterioration during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison of the carbon dioxide and the abdominal wall lift method. Anesth. Analg. 85,886-891 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Schulze S, Lyng KM, Bugge K etal. Cardiovascular and respiratory changes and convalescence in laparoscopic colonic surgery. Aith. Surg. 134,1112–1118 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Birkett DH. Robotics. Surg. Endosc. 16, 1257–1258 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruurda JP, Broeders IAMJ. Robot-assisted laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis. Surg. Endosc. 17,236–241 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH. Telebiotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis. Colon Rectum 45, 1689–1694 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie A, Carey FA, Pratt NR, Steele RJC. The colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence. BE j Surg. 89,845–860 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelloff GJ, Boone CVV, Sigman CC, Greenwald P. Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer. In: Prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer. Young GP, Rozen P, Levin B (Eds). WB Saunders, London, UK, 115–139 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Winawer SJ, Fletcher RII, Rex DK etal Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale update based on new evidence. Castmenterology124,544–560 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorudi S, Steele R, MCArdle CS. Surgery for colorectal cancer. BE Med. Bull. 64, 101–118 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Metcalf AM. Minimal access surgery, part 1: laparoscopic colectomy. Sing Clin. North Am. 80(4) 1323–1328 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Stocchi L, Nelson H. Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. I Surg. Oncol 68,255–267 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson H, Weeks JC, Wieand HS. Proposed Phase III trial comparing laparoscopic-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for colon cancer. j Natl Cancer Inst. 19,51–56 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Stead M, Brown J, Bosanquet N etal. Assessing the relative costs of standard open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer in a randomised controlled trial in the UK. Grit. Rev Oncol Haematol 33,99–103 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• •Looks at the costs of a randomized trial.
   Google Scholar