172
Views
64
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Drug Profile

Bicalutamide (Casodex®) in the treatment of prostate cancer

Pages 37-48 | Published online: 10 Jan 2014

References

  • Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, Parkin DM. GLOBOCAN 2000: Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide, version 1.0, 5th edition. IARC Press, Lyon, France (2001).
  • Steinberg GD, Bales GT, Brendler CB. An analysis of watchful waiting for clinically localized prostate cancer. j Ural 159,1431–1436 (1998).
  • Holmberg L, Bill-Axelson A, Helgesen F et al. A randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J. Med. 347, 781–789 (2002).
  • Campbell T, Blasko J, Crawford ED et al Clinical staging of prostate cancer: reproducibility and clarification of issues. Int.j Cancer96, 198–209 (2001).
  • Amling CL, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, Seay TM, Slezak J, Zincke H. Long-term hazard progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: continued risk of biochemical failure after 5 years. j Ural 164,101–105 (2000).
  • Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, Chan DW, Pearson JD, Walsh PC. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAIVIA 281,1591–1597 (1999).
  • Roach M, Lu J, Pilepich MV et al Four prognostic groups predict long-term survival from prostate cancer following radiotherapy alone on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group clinical trials. Int. j Radiat. Oncol Biol. Phys. 47,609–615 (2000).
  • Epstein JI, Partin AW, Sauvageot J, Walsh PC. Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy. A multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up. Am. j Surg. Pathol 20,286–292 (1996).
  • Tyrrell CJ. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for prostate cancer. Eur. Ural 36,549–558 (1999).
  • •Comprehensive review of neoadjuvant and adjuvant hormonal therapy.
  • Cassileth BR, Soloway MS, Vogelzang NJ et al Quality of life and psychosocial status in stage D prostate cancer. Qua Life Res. 1, 323–329 (1992).
  • Cassileth BR, Soloway MS, Vogelzang NJ et al Patients' choice of the treatment in stage D prostate cancer. Urology 33\(Suppl. 5), 57–62 (1989).
  • Vogelzang NJ, Chodak GW, Soloway MS et al Goserelin versus orchiectomy in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer: final results of a randomized trial. Zoladex Prostate Study Group. Urology 46, 220–226 (1995).
  • Kaisary AV, Tyrrell CJ, Peeling WB, Griffiths K. Comparison of LHRH analogue (Zoladex) with orchiectomy in patients with metastatic prostatic carcinoma. BE j Uml. 67,502–508 (1991).
  • Samdal F, Vada K, Lundmo PI, Mjolnerod OK. Orchidectomy or LHRH-analogue? Which do the patients prefer and what treatment would Norwegian urologists prefer if they had advanced cancer of the prostate? Scand Ural Nephml. 25,197–199 (1991).
  • Denis L. Role of maximal androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer. Prostate Suppl 5,17–22 (1994).
  • Prostate Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Maximum androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer: an overview of 22 randomised trials with 3283 deaths in 5710 patients. Lancet 346,265–269 (1995).
  • Caubet JF, Tosteson TD, Dong EW et al Maximum androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of published randomised controlled trials using nonsteroidal anti-androgens. Urology 49,71–78 (1997).
  • Prostate Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Maximum androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet 355, 1491–1498 (2000).
  • Eisenberger MA, Blumenstein BA, Crawford ED et al. Bilateral orchiectomy with or without flutamide for metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl. J. Med. 339, 1036–1042 (1998).
  • Small EJ, Reese DM, Vogelzang NJ. Hormone-refractory prostate cancer: an evolving standard of care. Sernin. Oncol 26\(Suppl. 17), 61–67 (1999).
  • Woodburn JR. The epidermal growth factor receptor and its inhibition in cancer therapy. Phatmacol Ther. 82,241–250 (1999).
  • Nelson JB, Nabulsi AA, Vogelzang NJ et al Suppression of prostate cancer induced bone remodeling by the endothelin receptor A antagonist atrasentan. J. Um/. 169,1143–1149 (2003).
  • Mettlin CJ, Murphy GP, Rosenthal DS, Menck HR. The National Cancer Database report on prostate carcinoma after the peak in incidence rates in the US. The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Cancer83, 1679–1684 (1998).
  • Kirby R. Treatment options for early prostate cancer. Urology52,948–962 (1998).
  • Daniell HW, Dunn SR, Ferguson DW, Lomas G, Niazi Z, Stratte PT Progressive osteoporosis during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J. Um/. 163, 181–186 (2000).
  • Gardiner RA, Green H, Yaxley J et al Cognition and hormonal manipulation in prostate cancer. BE j Ural Int. 86\(Suppl. 3), 218–219 (2000) (Abstract MP6.1.03).
  • Fonseca R, Rajkumar SV, White WL, Tefferi A, Hoagland HC. Anemia after orchiectomy. Am. J. Hematol 59,230–233 (1998).
  • Cockshott ID, Sotaniemi EA, Cooper KJ, Jones DC. The pharmacokinetics of Casodex enantiomers in subjects with impaired liver function. BE j Clin. Pharmacol 36,339–343 (1993).
  • Furr BJ, Tucker H. The preclinical development of bicalutamide: pharmacodynamics and mechanism of action. Um/ogy47(Suppl. 1A), 13–25 (1996).
  • Kolvenbag GJCM, Furr BJA, BlacIdedge GRP. Receptor affinity and potency of non-steroidal anti-androgens: translation of preclinical findings into clinical activity. Prost. Cancer PD1, 307–314 (1998).
  • Furr BJA. Relative potencies of flutamide and `Casodex'. Endocr Relat. Cancer 4, 197–202 (1997).
  • Teutsch G, Goubet F, Battmann T et al Non-steroidal anti-androgens: synthesis and biological profile of high-affinity ligands for the androgen receptor. J. Steroid. Biochem. Mal Biol. 48,111–119 (1994).
  • Culig Z, Hoffman NJ, Erdel M et al Switch from antagonist to agonist of the androgen receptor bicalutamide is associated with prostate tumour progression in a new model system. BE J. Cancer 81, 242–251 (1999).
  • Fenton MA, Shuster TD, Fertig AM et al Functional characterization of mutant androgen receptors from androgen-independent prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 3,1383–1388 (1997).
  • Kemppainen JA, Wilson EM. Agonist and antagonist activities of hydroxyflutamide and Casodex relate to androgen receptor stabilization. Urology 48, 157–163 (1996).
  • McLeod DG, Iversen P. Gynecomastia in patients with prostate cancer: a review of treatment options. Urology56, 713–720 (2000).
  • ••Comprehensive review of managementoptions for gynecomastia in patients with prostate cancer.
  • Tyrrell CJ, Denis L, Newling D, Soloway M, Channer K, Cockshott ID. Casodex 10–200 mg daily, used as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. An overview of the efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetics from three Phase III dose-ranging studies. Casodex Study Group. Eur Ural 33,39–53 (1998).
  • Verhelst J, Denis L, VanVliet P et al. Endocrine profiles during administration of the new non-steroidal anti-androgen Casodex in prostate cancer. Clin. Enclocrinol 41,525–530 (1994).
  • Cockshott ID, Oliver SD, Young JJ, Cooper KS, Jones DC. The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of the bicalutamide (Casodex') enantiomers. Biopharm. Drug-Dispos. 18,499–507 (1997).
  • Cockshott ID, Cooper KJ, Sweetmore DS, Blacklock NS, Denis L. The pharmacokinetics of Casodex in prostate cancer patients after single and during multiple dosing. Eur Ural 18\(Suppl. 3), 10–17 (1990).
  • Mahler C, Verhelst J, Denis L. Clinical pharmacokinetics of the anti-androgens and their efficacy in prostate cancer. Clin. Phalmacokinet. 34,405–417 (1998).
  • McKillop D, Boyle GW, Cockshott ID, Jones DC, Phillips PJ, Yates RA. Metabolism and enantioselective pharmacokinetics of Casodex in man. Xenobiotica 23,1241–1253 (1993).
  • Kaisary A, Klarskov P, McKillop D. Absence of hepatic enzyme induction in prostate cancer patients receiving `Casodex' (bicalutamide). Anti Cancer Drugs 7,54–59 (1996).
  • Cockshott I. Bicalutamide: clinical pharmacokinetics and metabolism. Clin. Pharmacokinet. (2003) (In Press).
  • Denis L, Mahler C. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of bicalutamide: defining an active dosing regimen. Urology 47(Suppl. 1A), 26–28 (1996).
  • Bales GT, Chodak GW. A controlled trial of bicalutamide versus castration in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Urology 47, 38–43 (1996).
  • Kolvenbag GJCM, Nash A. Bicalutamide dosages used in the treatment of prostate cancer. Prostate 39,47–53 (1999).
  • Schellhammer PF, Sharifi R, Block NL et al Clinical benefits of bicalutamide compared with flutamide in combined androgen blockade for patients with advanced prostatic carcinoma: final report of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial. Urology50, 330–336 (1997).
  • •Mature results from a randomized comparison of two nonsteroidal antiandrogens in maximum androgen blockade (MAK
  • Schellhammer P, Sharifi R, Block N et al A controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy, in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Urology45, 745–752 (1995).
  • Sarosdy MF, Schellhammer PF, Sharifi R et al Comparison of goserelin and leuprolide in combined androgen blockade therapy. Urology52,82–88 (1998).
  • Iversen P, Tyrrell CJ, Kaisary AV et al. Casodex (bicalutamide) 150-mg monotherapy compared with castration in patients with previously untreated nonmetastatic prostate cancer: results from two multicenter randomized trials at a median follow-up of 4 years. Urology51, 389–396 (1998).
  • Tyrrell CJ, Kaisary AV, Iversen P et al A randomised comparison of `Casodex' (bicalutamide) 150 mg monotherapy versus castration in the treatment of metastatic and locally advanced prostate cancer. Eur Ural 33,447–456 (1998).
  • ••Mature analysis of bicalutamidemonotherapy versus castration in Ml patients.
  • Kaisary AV, Iversen P, Tyrrell CJ et al Is there a role for anti-androgen monotherapy in patients with metastatic prostate cancer? Prostate Cancer PD 4, 196–203 (2001).
  • Iversen P, Tyrrell CJ, Kaisary AV et al Bicalutamide monotherapy compared with castration in patients with nonmetastatic locally advanced prostate cancer: 6.3 years of follow-up.j Ural 164,1579–1582 (2000).
  • ••Mature analysis of bicalutamidemonotherapy versus castration in MO patients.
  • Iversen P, Melezinek I, Schmidt A. Nonsteroidal anti-androgens: a therapeutic option for patients with advanced prostate cancer who wish to retain sexual interest and function. BE j Uml. Int. 87,47-56 (2001).
  • ••Comprehensive review of the effects ofnonsteroidal antiandrogens on sexual interest and function.
  • Boccardo F, Rubagotti A, Barichello M et al Bicalutamide monotherapy versus flutamide plus goserelin in prostate cancer patients. Results of an Italian Prostate Cancer Project (PONCAP) study. J. Clin. Oncol 17,2027–2038 (1999).
  • •Comparison of bicalutamide monotherapy and MAB in MO and Ml patients.
  • Fourcade RO, Chatelain C, Poterre M. An open multicentre randomised study to compare the effect and safety of `Casodex' (bicalutamide) 150 mg monotherapy with castration plus nilutamide in metastatic prostate cancer. Eur. Ural 33,88 (1998) (Abstract 349).
  • Kucuk O, Fisher E, Moinpour CM et al Phase II trial of bicalutamide in patients with advanced prostate cancer in whom conventional hormonal therapy failed: a Southwest Oncology Group study (SWOG 9235). Urology58,53–58 (2001).
  • Joyce R, Fenton MA, Rode P et al. High dose bicalutamide for androgen independent prostate cancer: effect of prior hormonal therapy.J Ural 159,149–153 (1998).
  • Scher HI, Liebertz C, Kelly WK et al Bicalutamide for advanced prostate cancer: the natural versus treated history of disease. Clin. Oncol 15,2928–2938 (1997).
  • Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 351,1451–1467 (1998).
  • Chodak GW, Kolvenbag GJCM. Will the experience with tamoxifen in breast cancer help define the role of anti-androgens in prostate cancer? Prost. Cancer PD 4, 72–80 (2001).
  • Lawton CA, Winter K, Murray K et al Updated results of the Phase III Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 85–31 evaluating the potential benefit of androgen suppression following standard radiation therapy for unfavorable prognosis carcinoma of the prostate. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol Biol. Phys. 49,937-946 (2001).
  • Hanks GE, Lu J, Machtay M et al RTOG protocol 92–02: a Phase III trial of the use of long-term androgen suppression following neoadjuvant hormonal cytoreduction and radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol 19,327a (2000) (Abstract 1284).
  • Prayer-Galetti T, Zattoni F, Capizzi A, Dal Moro F, Pagano E Disease-free survival in patients with pathological 'C Stage' prostate cancer at radical retropubic prostatectomy submitted to adjuvant hormonal treatment. Eur. Ural 38,504 (2000) (Abstract 48).
  • Messing EM, Manola J, Sarosdy M, Wilding G, Crawford ED, Trump D. Immediate hormonal therapy compared with observation after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with node-positive prostate cancer. N Engl. J. Merl 341,1781–1788 (1999).
  • Bolla M, Collette L, Blank L et al Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a Phase III randomised trial. Lancet 360, 103–108 (2002).
  • Granfors T, Modig H, Damber JE, Tomic R. Combined orchiectomy and external radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for nonmetastatic prostate cancer with or without pelvic lymph node involvement: a prospective randomized study.j Ural 159, 2030–2034 (1998).
  • Pilepich MV, Caplan R, Byhardt RVV et al. Phase III trial of androgen suppression using goserelin in unfavorable-prognosis carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy: report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 85–31. j din. Oncol 15, 1013–1021 (1997).
  • See WA, McLeod D, Iversen P et al The bicalutamide Early Prostate Cancer program. Demography. Ural Oncol 6, 43–47 (2001).
  • ••Description of the design and patient demography of the bicalutamide Early Prostate Cancer (EPC) program.
  • See WA, McLeod DG, Wirth MP et al. Bicalutamide as immediate therapy either alone or as adjuvant to standard care of patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer: first analysis of the early prostate cancer program. j Ural 168, 429–435 (2002).
  • ••Results from the first combined analysis ofthe bicalutamide EPC program demonstrating a significant benefit with bicalutamide in terms of time to progression.
  • See WA. PSA changes in early prostate cancer: implications for patient management. Eur. Ural Suppl 1,17–23 (2002).
  • Iversen P, Tammela TLJ, Vaage S et al A randomised comparison of bicalutamide (Casodex') 150 mg versus placebo as immediate therapy either alone or as adjuvant to standard care for early non-metastatic prostate cancer. First report from the Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Group Study No. 6. Eur Ural 42,204–211 (2002).
  • •Results from the Scandinavian arm of the bicalutamide EPC program.
  • McLeod DG. Tolerability of nonsteroidal anti-androgens in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Oncologist 2, 18–27 (1997).
  • •Detailed review of the side effects of the nonsteroidal antiandrogens.
  • Payne H, Tyrrell C, Tammela T et al Prophylactic breast irradiation significantly reduces the incidence of bicalutamide (Casodex')-induced gynecomastia. int. j Racliat. Oncol Biol. Phys. 54,135 (2002).
  • Saltzstein D, Cantwell A, Sieber P et al. Prophylactic tamoxifen significantly reduces the incidence of bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia and breast pain. Br.Ural Int. 90,120 (2002).
  • Sieber PR, Keiller DL, Kahnoski RJ et al Bone mineral density is maintained during bicalutamide (Casodex') treatment. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol 21,196a (2002).
  • Wysowski DK, Fourcroy JL. Flutamide hepatotoxicity. j Ural 155, 209–212 (1996).
  • McCaffrey JA, Scher HI. Interstitial pneumonitis following bicalutamide treatment for prostate cancer. J. Ural 160,131 (1998).
  • Dole EJ, Holdsworth MT Nilutamide: an anti-androgen for the treatment of prostate cancer. Ann. Pharmacother. 31,65–75 (1997).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.