Universal Linkage System: versatile nucleic acid labeling technique

References

• KREATECH Biotechnology BV. US 5,580,990.
   Google Scholar
• KREATECH Biotechnology BV. EP 0,539,466.
   Google Scholar
• KREATECH Biotechnology BV. US 5,714,327.
   Google Scholar
• KREATECH Biotechnology BV. US 5,985,566.
   Google Scholar
• KREATECH Biotechnology BV. US 6,133,038.
   Google Scholar
• Zamble DB, Lippard SJ. The response of cellular proteins to cisplatin-damaged DNA. In: Cisplatin: Chemistry and Biochemistry of a Leading Anticancer Drug. Lippert B (Ed.), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 73.110 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Van Garderen CJ, Altona C, Reedijk J. Conformational changes in a single- and double-stranded nonanucleotide upon complexation of a monofunctional platinum compound as studied by 1H NMR, 31P NMR and CD methods. Inorg. Chem. 29, 1481.1487 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Talman EG, Myers DP, Reedijk J. Conformational changes in d(TpG) and 5–GTP induced by monofunctional binding of [PtCl(NH3)3]Cl and [PtCl(dien)]Cl are small. Inorg. Chim. Acta 240, 25–28 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Multhaupt HA, Fessler JN, Warhol MJ. Detection of human papillomavirus in laryngeal lesions by in situ hybridization. Hum. Pathol. 25, 1302–1305 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Gissmann L, Wolnik L, Ikenberg H, Koldovsky U, Schnurch HG, zur Hausen H. Human papillomavirus types 6 and 11 DNA sequences in genital and laryngeal papillomas and in some cervical cancers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80, 560–563 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• Lorincz AT, Quinn AP, Goldsborough MD, McAllister P, Temple GF. Human papillomavirus Type 56: a new virus detected in cervical cancer. J. Gen. Virol. 70, 3099–3104 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Schiffman MH, Bauer HM, Hoover RN et al. Epidemiologic evidence showing that human papillomavirus infection causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 85, 958–964 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Sherman ME, Schiffman MH, Lorincz AT et al. Cervical specimens collected in liquid buffer are suitable for both cytologic screening and ancillary human papillomavirus testing. Cancer Cytopathol. 81, 89–97 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black CM. Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10, 160–184 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• •• This review article extensively describes epidemiology, clinical manifestations and current detection methods concerning C. trachomatis.
   Google Scholar
• DeSanjose S, Munoz N, Bosch FX et al. Sexually transmitted agents and cervical neoplasia in Columbia and Spain. Int. J. Cancer 36, 358–363 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Nunez-Troconis JT. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Chlamydia trachomatis and other cofactors. Invest. Clin. 36, 101–116 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Koskela P, Anttila, Bjrge T et al. Chlamydia trachomatis infection as a risk factor for invasive cervical cancer. Int. J. Cancer 85, 35–39 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Schachter J, Stoner E, Moncada J. Screening for chlamydial infections in women attending family planning clinics. West. J. Med. 138, 375–379 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• Stam WE, Cole B. Asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis in men. Sex. Transm. Dis. 13, 163–165 (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morr SA, Meijer CJL, Munk C et al. Pooling of urine specimens for detection of asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections by PCR in a low-prevalence population: cost-saving strategy for epidemiological studies and screening programs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38, 1679– 1680 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Stamm WE. Expanding efforts to prevent chlamydial infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 339, 768–769 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelin MJ, Robinson AJ, Ridgway GL, Allason-Jones E, Williams P. Chlamydial urethritis in heterosexual men attending a genitourinary medicine clinic: prevalence, symptoms, condom usage and partner change. Int. J. STD AIDS 6, 27–30 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Gupta PK, Lee EF, Erozan YS, Frost JK, Geddes ST, Donovan PA. Cytologic investigations in Chlamydia infection. Acta Cytol. 23, 315–320 (1979).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta PK, Shurbaji MS, Mintor LJ, Ermatinger SV, Meyers J, Quinn TC. Cytopathologic detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginopancervical (Fast) smears. Diagn. Cytopathol. 4, 224–229 (1988).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devilee P, Thierry RF, Kievits T. Detection of chromosome aneuploidy in interphase nuclei from human primary breast tumors using chromosome-specific repetitive DNA probes. Cancer Res. 48, 5825–5830 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Klinger K, Landes G, Shook D. Rapid detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 51, 55–65 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Willard JF, Waye JS. Hierarchical order in chromosome-specific human alpha-satallite DNA. Trends Genet. 3, 192–198 (1987).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauwerse JG, Kievits T, Beverstock GC. Rapid detection of chromosome 16 inversion in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia, subtype M4: regional localization of the breakpoint in 16p. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 53, 126 128 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Lee W, Han K, Harris CP, Shim S, Kim S, Meisner LF. Use of FISH to detect chromosomal translocations and deletions. Analysis of chromosome specific rearrangements in synovial sarcoma cells from paraffin-embedded specimens. Am. J. Pathol. 143, 15–19 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Arnoldus EPJ, Wiegant J, Noordermeer IA. Detection of the Philadelphia chromosome in interphase nuclei. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 54, 108–111 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Wiegant JCAG, van Gijlswijk RPM, Heetebrij RJ, Bezrokoove V, Raap AK, Tanke HJ. ULS : a versatile method of labeling nucleic acids for FISH based on a monofunctional reaction of cisplatin derivatives with guanine moieties. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 87, 47–52 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schrck E, du Manoir S, Veldman T et al. Multicolor spectral karyotyping of human chromosomes. Science 273, 494–497 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Speicher MR, Ballard SG, Ward DC. Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-color FISH. Nature Genet. 12, 368–375 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Tanke HJ, Wiegant J, van Gijlswijk RPM et al. New strategy for multi-colour fluorescence in situ hybridization: COBRA: COmbined Binary RAtio labeling. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 7, 2–11 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• •• This artcile describes the method of COBRA as well as how this technique is used to elucidate complex karyotypes that are difficult or impossible to karyotype with standard banding techniques.
   Google Scholar
• Macville M, Schrck E, Padilla-Nash H et al. Comprehensive and definitive molecular cytogenetic characterization of HeLa cells by spectral karyotyping. Cancer Res. 59, 141–150 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Veldman T, Vignon C, Schrck E, Rowley JD, Ried T. Hidden chromosome abnormalities in haematological malignancies detected by multi-color spectral karyotyping. Nature Genet. 15, 406–410 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Dauwerse JG, Wiegant J, Raap AK, Breuning MH, van Ommen GJB. Multiple colors by fluorescence in situ hybridization using ratio-labeled DNA probes create a molecular karyotype. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1, 593–598 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Koopman LA, Szuhai K, van Eendenburg JDH et al. Recurrent integration of human papilomaviruses 16, 45 and 67 near translocation breakpoints in new cervical cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 59, 5615– 5624 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Bezrookove V, Hansson K, Van der Burg M et al. Individuals with abnormal phenotype and normal G-banding karyotype: improvements and limitations in the diagnosis by the use of 24-colour MFISH. Hum. Genet. 106(4), 392–398 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Telenius H, Carter NP, Bepp CE, Nordenskjold M, Ponder BA, Tunnacliffe A. Degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer. Genomics 13, 718–725 (1992).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning Y, Roschke A, Smit ACM, Lyndon- Kearney EL. A complete set of human telomeric probes and their clinical applications. Nature Genet. 14, 86–89 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D et al. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 258, 818–821 (1992).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forozan F, Karhu R, Kononen J, Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP. Genome screening by comparative genomic hybridization. Trends Genet. 13, 405–409 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Knuutila S, Bjrkqvist AM, Autio K et al. DNA copy number amplifications in human neoplasms: review of comparative genomic hybridization studies. Am. J. Pathol. 152, 1107–1123 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Van Dekken H, Rosenberg C, Krijtenburg PJ, Alers J. Interphase cytogenetics and comparative genomic hybridization of human epithelial cancers and precursor lesions. Histochem. Cell Biol. 108, 419–430 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders AM, Hindle AK, Segraves R et al. Quantitative DNA copy number analysis across the human genome with ~ 1 megabase resolution using array CGH. The American Society of Human Genetics, 50th Annual Meeting (October 3–7, 2000), Philadelphia, PE, USA, 67, 31 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Alers J, Rochat J, Krijtenburg PJ, van Dekken H, Raap AK, Rosenberg C. Universal Linkage System: an improved method for labeling archival DNA for comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 25, 301–305 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• •• This article describes the use of genomic DNA, isolated from formaldehyde-fixed, parafin-embedded, archival material for CGH.
   Google Scholar
• Van Belkum A, Van Leeuwen W, Verkooyen S, Sacilik C, Cokmus C, Verbrugh H. Dissemination of a single clone of methicillin resistent Staphylococcus aureus among Turkish hospitals. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35, 978–981 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen W, Van Belkum A, Kreiswirth B, Verbrugh H. Genetic diversification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a function of prolonged geographic dissemination and a measured by binary typing and other genotyping methods. Res. Microbiol. 149, 497–507 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Belkum A, Bax R, Van Straaten PCJ, Quint WGV, Veringa E. PCR fingerprinting for epidemiological studies of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Microbiol. Meth. 20, 235–247 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Cookson BD, Aparicio A, Deplano A, Struelens M, Goering R, Marples R. Intercenter comparison of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for the typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Med. Microbiol. 44, 179–184 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33, 2233–2239 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen W, Verbrugh H, Van der Velden J, Heck M, Van Belkum A. Validation of binary typing for Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37, 664–674 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen W, Schalk M, Veuskens J, Libregts C, Verbrugh H, Van Belkum A. Binary typing of Staphylococcus aureus through reversed hybridization using digoxigenin-Universal Linkage Systemlabeled bacterial genomic DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39, 328–331 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• • This study describes the introduction of the novel S. aureus binary typing system.
   Google Scholar
• Ross XL, Rueger B, Laengin T, Reske-Kunz AB. Nonradioactive detection of differentially expressed genes using complex RNA or DNA hybridization probes. Biotechniques 26, 150–155 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Hoevel T, Holz H, Kubbies M. Cisplatindigoxigenin mRNA labeling for nonradioactive detection of mRNA hybridized onto nucleic acid cDNA arrays. Biotechniques 27, 1064–1067 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• • This study describes the enhanced detection limits of ULS-labeled mRNA over radioactive labeled cDNA on nylon cDNA arrays.
   Google Scholar
• Adler K, Broadbent J, Garlick R et al. MICROMAX: a highly sensitive system for differential gene-expression on microarrays. In: Microarray Biochip Technology. Mark Schena (Ed.), Biotechniques Books, Eaton Publishing, Natick, MA, USA, 221–230 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Bobrow MN, Thomas D, Harris D, Shaughnessy KJ, Litt GJ. Catalyzed reporter deposition, a novel method of signal amplification. Application to immunoassays. J. Immunol. Meth. 124, 279–285 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Bobrow MN, Shaughnessy KJ, Litt GJ. Catalyzed reporter deposition, a novel method of signal amplification. II. Application to membrane immunoassays. J. Immunol. Meth. 137, 103 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEN Life Sciences, Inc. US 5,731,158.
   Google Scholar
• NEN Life Sciences, Inc. US 5,583,001.
   Google Scholar
• NEN Life Sciences, Inc. US 5,196,306.
   Google Scholar
• Chee M, Yang R, Hubbell E et al. Accessing genomic information with high-density arrays. Science 274, 610–614 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar