BACs-on-beads: a new robust and rapid detection method for prenatal diagnosis

References

• Cirigliano V, Ejarque M, Cañadas MP, et al. Clinical application of multiplex quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) for the rapid prenatal detection of common chromosome aneuploidies. Mol Hum Reprod 2001;7:1001-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann K, Fox SP, Abbs SJ, et al. Development and implementation of a new rapid aneuploidy diagnostic service within the UK National Health Service and implications for the future of prenatal diagnosis. Lancet 2001;358:1057-61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boormans EM, Birnie E, Oepkes D, MLP and Karyotyping Evaluation (M.A.K.E.) Study Group. Comparison of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115(2 Pt 1):297-303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdes T, Kirchhoff M, Lind AM, et al. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in prenatal diagnosis-experience of a large series of rapid testing for aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y. Prenat Diagn 2008;28:1119-25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Opstal D, Boter M, de Jong D, et al. Rapid aneuploidy detection with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification: a prospective study of 4000 amniotic fluid samples. Eur J Hum Genet 2009;17:112-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet 2010;86:749-64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer LG, Coppinger J, Alliman S, et al. Comparison of microarray-based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimens. Prenat Diagn 2008;28:789-95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choy KW, Setlur SR, Lee C, Lau TK. The impact of human copy number variation on a new era of genetic testing. BJOG 2010;117:391-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung TY, Pooh RK, Wang CC, et al. Classification of pathogenic or benign status of CNVs detected by microarray analysis. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2010;10:717-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross SJ, Bajaj K, Garry D, et al. Rapid and novel prenatal molecular assay for detecting aneuploidies and microdeletion syndromes. Prenat Diagn 2011;31:259-66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vialard F, Simoni G, Aboura A, et al. Prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ : a new technology for rapid detection of aneuploidies and microdeletions in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2011;31:500-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer LG, Coppinger J, Morton SA, et al. The development of a rapid assay for prenatal testing of common aneuploidies and microdeletion syndromes. Prenat Diagn 2011;31:778-87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vialard F, Simoni G, Gomes DM, et al. Prenatal BACs-on-Beads™: the prospective experience of five prenatal diagnosis laboratories. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:329-35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowski K, Henkelman M, Zajaczek S. Will the new molecular karyotyping BACs-on-Beads technique replace the traditional cytogenetic prenatal diagnostics? Preliminary reports. Ginekol Pol 2012;83:284-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng YK, Wong C, Wong HK, et al. The detection of mosaicism by prenatal BoBs. Prenat Diagn 2013;33:42-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popowski T, Vialard F, Leroy B, et al. Williams-Beuren syndrome: the prenatal phenotype. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205(6):e6-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grati FR, Gomes DM, Ganesamoorthy D, et al. Application of a new molecular technique for the genetic evaluation of products of conception. Prenat Diagn 2013;33(1):32-41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popowski T, Molina-Gomes D, Loeuillet L, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of the duplication 17p11.2 associated with Potocki-Lupski syndrome in a foetus presenting with mildly dysmorphic features. Eur J Med Genet 2012;55:723-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheath KL, Duffy L, Asquith P, et al. Bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs)-on-Beads™ as a diagnostic platform for the rapid aneuploidy screening of products of conception. Mol Med Rep 2013;8:650-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter L, Adayapalam N. A comparative study of standard cytogenetic evaluation and molecular karyotyping for products of conception. Diagn Mol Pathol 2013. [Epub ahead of print]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paxton CN, Brothman AR, Geiersbach KB. Rapid aneusomy detection in products of conception using the KaryoLite™ BACs-on-Beads™ assay. Prenat Diagn 2013;33(1):25-31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peakman DC, Moreton MF, Corn BJ, Robinson A. Chromosomal mosaicism in amniotic fluid cell cultures. Am J Hum Genet 1979;31:149-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang BB, Rubin CH, Williams J 3rd. Mosaicism in chorionic villus sampling: an analysis of incidence and chromosomes involved in 2612 consecutive cases. Prenat Diagn 1993;13:179-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gekas J, van den Berg DG, Durand A, et al. Rapid testing versus karyotyping in Down’s syndrome screening: cost-effectiveness and detection of clinically significant chromosome abnormalities. Eur J Hum Genet 2011;19:3-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sánchez-García J, et al. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril 2011;95:953-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Liu J, Collins GS, et al. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet 2012;5:24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau TK, Cheung SW, Lo PS, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities by low coverage whole genome sequencing of maternal plasma DNA: review of 1,982 consecutive cases in a single center. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013. [Epub ahead of print]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futch T, Spinosa J, Bhatt S, et al. Initial clinical laboratory experience in noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy from maternal plasma DNA samples. Prenat Diagn 2013;33:569-74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morain S, Greene MF, Mello MM. A new era in noninvasive prenatal testing. N Engl J Med 2013;369:499-501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau TK, Jiang FM, Stevenson RJ, et al. Secondary findings from non-invasive prenatal testing for common fetal aneuploidies by whole genome sequencing as a clinical service. Prenat Diagn 2013;33(6):602-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar